If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
tele_mark said:They just put the gun buyback issue up on the Sentinel/Enterprise Blog a little while ago. No comments yet, and I'm getting my thoughts together:
BillK said:Going back to the topic I think the city should do a buyback in fact I think every town/city should have a buyback running
Boston gun buy back = gun crime has increased by 62% this year.
Criminals don’t turn in guns. Someone needs to tell Dean Tran to pull his head out of the sand. At least Police Chief Ed Cronin knows that any program like this will waste much needed taxpayer dollars, take resources away from the police department, and will have a negative effect on violent crime in the city.
Posted by: Benjamin | July 14, 2006 12:08 AM
Mine would have been somewhere in here...
Posted by: Obie | July 14, 2006 09:48 AM
derek said:Looks like mine didn't make the cut...
I've never spoken to a single police officer that wanted more unregistered guns in their district. If a buyback program takes illegal, unregistered guns off the street and off the beat of our local police, how can it be a bad thing?
derek said:I tried to reply to this post.
I've never spoken to a single police officer that wanted more unregistered guns in their district. If a buyback program takes illegal, unregistered guns off the street and off the beat of our local police, how can it be a bad thing?
I don't remember how it went. But it was tactful and should have been posted.
KMaurer said:Probably because you had posted recently; my post was also in response to that post and was just accepted.
Ken
I'll be surprised if those asshats post it. They are holding more and more that are against the gun buy back and posting more that are for it.Nashmack said:I actually just replied to him Mark, the closing paragraph of my response, to paraphrase it, states simply that the second the police get involved (and they will be in one form or another) then your tax dollars start getting used. They dont work for free.
Damn my post is being held for approval again
I don't believe it really matters where the money for the program comes from--be it tax dollars or private donations.
The simple fact is, regardless of the source of the money, there are better programs, such as community policing or anti-gang efforts, where the money could be spent than on a gun buy back program.
The only people likely to turn in guns with a program like this one are people looking for the cash score. They have access to the gun, have no need for the gun, and can use the cash. Someone carrying a gun illegally, and perceives a need for having the gun, will not be turning it in. Unless they know where they can score another one cheaply.
Will the program ultimately take some guns "off the street"? Likely yes, but that is focussing on the wrong meteric for measuring success. If there is no measurable, corresponding decrease in the rate of "gun-related" crime, then I would conclude that the money would be better spent on more effective policing needs such as cops on the street to arrest people who violate the State's gun laws.
Unfortunately, companies such as Walmart and Target are only interested in the headlines generated by their involvement in the program and the fact that it gets more people into their stores. Donating say $100K to the local cop's anti-gang unit isn't nearly as sexy as the press generated by a gun buyback program.