The process is the punishment.
-
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
-
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Fatal Shooting in Worcester by Westborough LTC holder UPDATE: Guilty of Involuntary Manslaughter! 4-7 Year Sentence with 77 Days Credit.
- Thread starter DJBrad
- Start date
eboos
NES Member
I've got a guy right now who is calculating just how much 60 days of his freedom should be worth. "Spidey sense" does not amount to probable cause. Judge in the criminal case agreed with me. Every officer in every department should be required to have bodycam.
That, but also the average american news viwer is a braindead fgt. It has to be salacious garbage or involve a bunch of people dying to get coverage, and even that shit doesnt get covered properly or well at all.
things the media doesnt touch much of or barely at all:
-Making a visible and proper retraction when they make an egregious mistake that involves an apology more than 5 seconds long.
-Basically anytime the media was wrong for casting someone in a negative light when in retrospect, the association turned out not to be true (like in your patriot front guy example)
-Moonbat politicians or celebs f***ing up in a way that doesnt involve a sex scandal. For example Cuomo's actions under covid basically killed a shitload of elderly people by hotboxing
them with covid, but that wasn't important.... it took "sexual harassment" type stuff to bring him down. Only the media can think that a sex scandal is more important than abusing a bunch of elderly people resulting in their deaths.
-White people being killed by police for stupid reasons (contrary to popular belief, shitty policing is not only a racial thing)
-Brown people/children being kidnapped or abducted (we know this happens, but it barely gets covered except possibly in local news markets where brown people make up a substantial part of the population. Yet, a young white girl gets killed by her boyfriend and its national news for like 2 weeks, everywhere. (if it was a dude or a brown person as the victim, the media simply doesn't care).
-Any extended coverage of someone exonerated from a serious crime that they didn't commit and how badly the system f***ed up. (there are TV programs about this, but rarely in MSM prime time news. ) Best example of this, Richard Jewell. They f***ed that guy over hard.
-Civil asset forfeiture abuses. Some coverage, but not nearly enough
-Interviewing any person who destroys a common narrative. Examples- a black guy who lawfully carries a gun (Fox actually did this a few times, but nobody else), an LGBTQ type person who doesn't think that biological males competing in womens sports is a great idea.
-Interviewing people on the street who arent dumb. Apparently people who deliver the intelligent answer are not ratings worthy.
-Transgender people who are "more legit" - EG, there are actually trans people who are aware of their biological gender and dont act retarded about it, but MSM cant have them talking on the tv. Same thing with gays and others that don't like shit other people do with the LGBTMNOPQ label on it. Like I am sure there are people sick of being conflated with kids, but they dont want to get "canceled" by the "mob".
-Current or ex police who think the war on drugs is stupid. Or the same who think entirely too much people are incarcerated for stupid shit, compromising public safety by filling jails with people who are only merely annoying while a diddler gets put on an ankle monitor. There are tons of these people but MSM cant give them a mic, cant stop the river of blood from DEM DRUGZ from screwing up their ratings.
I hope this guy does the right thing and moves out of this shithole when this is over. It's patently obvious that they know they're stuck and now they're furtively trying to throw floor mats under the bald tires of the prosecution's car while trying to liberate it from an ice skating rink.
They 'processed' me for 20 months, I get no respect
What do you mean by that?
The process is the punishment. He will be ostracized, bankrupted, slandered and unemployable. Then they will drop the charges because the shooting was justified.
It will be too late his life will be changed forever and the damage done.
Are you being edgy or dense? He's being held without F-ing bail.
I guess dense in this case. I did not realize he is being held in jail still.
eboos
NES Member
Jeez man! That was harsh!
Well it's a 23 page thread that he's already posted in 15 times before today.Jeez man! That was harsh!
I don't memorize every case that shows up here. I drop in, read a bit, make a remark, drop out again. Not at the top of my must remember list.
That's why I finally blocked him a few months ago.
Ah, if only we were all nuclear experts like Len. And ex-special-police. And summons-deliverers. And Notheastern University inside experts.
![[laugh]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/012.gif "Laugh [laugh]")
So smaht.
wait, you mean you're not? someone messed up in NES membership vettingAh, if only we were all nuclear experts like Len. And ex-special-police. And summons-deliverers. And Notheastern University inside experts.
So smaht.
You realize you are, proverbially, 'talking to the hand', don't you? He just wrote that he blocks you.Ah, if only we were all nuclear experts like Len. And ex-special-police. And summons-deliverers. And Notheastern University inside experts.
So smaht.
![[rofl]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/013.gif "ROFL [rofl]")
Ha ha. THAT is the joke, son.You realize you are, proverbially, 'talking to the hand', don't you? He just wrote that he blocks you.
Marty McFly
NES Member
This poor guy. It seems like they don't have anything on him. Absolutely insane to steal his freedom like that
This thread could be a Seinfeld episode. Except the guy that’s getting hung up…
Who gets to decide that it's legal to hold the guy with no bail, the DA?
The judge.
eboos
NES Member
Yes, the judge - at the DA (ADA)’s request based on a number of factors.
I have not kept up with the thread and have yet to decide if it indeed was a 'good shoot', BUT...
The fact that this guy has been held without bail is f-ing horrendous. Because of that, I want him to walk regardless of the reason he pulled the trigger. Who is the judge in this case?
The fact that this guy has been held without bail is f-ing horrendous. Because of that, I want him to walk regardless of the reason he pulled the trigger. Who is the judge in this case?
headednorth
NES Member
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2012
- Messages
- 26,725
- Likes
- 49,344
Judge Robert J. Pellegrini | Trellis
Who is Robert J. Pellegrini? Read a full bio along with recent rulings and grant rates for a variety of motions.
trellis.law
HARRYM
NES Member
They made the arrest,,,,then they went on a search for a crime. They went public with a request to find a witness. At this point it's clear they are afraid to go into court as they likely have a poor murder case.
Thank you.Judge Robert J. Pellegrini | Trellis
Who is Robert J. Pellegrini? Read a full bio along with recent rulings and grant rates for a variety of motions.
HARRYM
NES Member
Pellegrini has held others accused of murder without bail.
Tartakovsky
NES Member
What legal recourse does he have for the court holding him without bail and without being charged for months?
eboos
NES Member
I do not necessarily have a problem with holding someone on dangerousness provided the facts align properly. In this case, even with a finding of dangerousness, there are less restrictive means to ensure public safety while in the pretrial phase. The multiple delays in holding the dangerousness hearing - was this at the defense's request? I expect it must be since the defendant has a right to a hearing within 10 days. If at the defense's request, maybe this isn't such a good case for the defendant after all. I still expect a murder charge to be brought and this case moved to Superior Court. Kicking the can may be a tactical move to have the dangerousness hearing done fresh in Superior Court without there being a prior finding of dangerousness in District Court.
Similar threads
