If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
I honestly thought that was an Onion video when I first watched it.
I'm afraid this is even cooler than people realize.
All it takes is 20 NES members to pledge $50 each and it's paid for.In all seriousness, this is worth fifty or a hundred bucks to me if we can get a group going on it.
All it takes is 20 NES members to pledge $50 each and it's paid for.
Is manufacturing a firearm legal?
In general, yes. Semi-automatic firearms, including the AR-15 lower receivers, are generally legal to manufacture for private individuals per US federal law Title 18 do not require serialization or other maker's marks. However, some states/municipalities restrict either the manufacture of certain firearms, or, more recently, the personal manufacture of a firearm with a 3D printer and/or CNC machine. DD makes no claim regarding local manufacturing legality; lower receiver files provided by Defense Distributed might require special licensing to manufacture and/or possess.
Under federal law, manufacturing a firearm for contemplation of future sale without an FFL is prohibited. Without a manufacturing FFL, you should manufacture firearms for personal use only. There are methods to legally transfer ownership of personally manufactured firearms, but they do not apply when the original manufacturing intent is to build a firearm for commercial or non-personal use. Recent ATF determinations have signaled that allowing others use of your CNC equipment may itself constitute manufacturing, therefore Defense Distributed advises GhostGunner owners to neither print firearms for other individuals, nor allow other individuals to use their GhostGunner to manufacture firearms.
Would co-ownership be legal, and would that not put every co-owner on the hook if the ATF wanted to seize an opportunity to round up 24 people on some tortured interpretation of law?The $999 price point sold out.
The remaining 84 units are $1199, but 24 is definitely 'do-able' for us I'd think.
Indeed, though I'm not sure sarcasm was seen as such.Some really good comments after that one...
MichaelZWilliamson Robotra • 3 hours agoThe founding fathers could never have foreseen instantaneous transfer of child porn and battle plans. We need reasonable controls on the First Amendment to protect America and the Children.
So-called "free speech advocates" are only child porn enablers, selfish, with no concern for others.
There's no reason you can't have reasonable internet access at a library, monitored by the government to ensure you're not a criminal. If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.
So-called "Free speech" kills kids.
Indeed, though I'm not sure sarcasm was seen as such.