I don’t think the gun control advocates have thought this through, but have decided they don’t need to establish the value of the dataset yet - it’s just a “win” to be capitalized later. I find ingenuous their stated purpose of flagging suspicious purchases of firearms and ammo, which is certainly just a ruse to create a dataset linking credit card holder and firearms/ammo purchases. A dataset cannot be legally/illegally obtained and exploited unless that dataset exists, so I think that’s their goal. Then they start trying to obtain de-identified metadata on that dataset to prove utility in crime-fighting so they can propose legislation that intends to eventually drive down to the person/transaction level.
But I think they’ll fail to find any initial utility. Look at the Globe’s “The Mill” exposé - they got mileage from publicly accessible data (FOI-able and published datasets) to make their story. Short of a person-level list of who bought guns/ammo from the CC dataset, there’s little new to do with any de-identified metadata. I’d worry about some social justice warrior at a CC processor that leaked the data to the dark interwebs before I’d worry about anything else.
That said, it’s a step down the slippery slope to registration & confiscation that must be stopped. The 2021 Nat’l Firearms Survey found 32% owned guns and other surveys find 40%+ of household own guns (probably underestimates). It doesn’t take to much imagination to figure what a Google Maps app would look like drilling down to the street address for gun ownership.
View attachment 660813