let's be honest...we never really had this right in MA, did we?
we have it right now but it doesn't matter because most everyone is scared to use it
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
let's be honest...we never really had this right in MA, did we?
we have it right now but it doesn't matter because most everyone is scared to use it
let's be honest...we never really had this right in MA, did we?
for bonus points open carry in the chipotle in westford, MA. the town which tried (and failed! woo!) to pass their own little gun ban not too long ago.
we have it right now but it doesn't matter because most everyone is scared to use it
You do NOT have the "right" to keep and bear arms. I'm sick of people saying this because it is being willfully ignorant of the truth.
All your life you have been told that driving is a privilege, correct? You need a license to drive and to bear arms.
Both licenses can be taken away, but there is a big difference. To take one away, forms have to be filled out, due process has to be followed and even with the most egregious offenses by the licensee, you can get the license reinstated eventually.
The other license can be denied you for no reason and taken away on the whim of one person.
One license is good anywhere in the continental US, one is not. Guess which one is which?
There is no "right" to keep and bear arms.
You do NOT have the "right" to keep and bear arms. I'm sick of people saying this because it is being willfully ignorant of the truth.
All your life you have been told that driving is a privilege, correct? You need a license to drive and to bear arms.
Both licenses can be taken away, ...
Pretty pointless if you don't exercise it, don't you think? Oh, I support the right to bear arms to the extent that you don't bears arms. Yep, that makes sense...
I reserve the right to defend myself and my loved ones lives by any means necessary.
But I haven't shot anyone this week.
So have I lost the right?
Even better than Bueno y Sano is Two Rivers Burritos in Westfield.
Not needing to do something and not ever even planning on doing something are not the same thing. I would have thought that to be obvious. Good strawman though.
10th, but we digress...You guys are brainwashed. The libs have you thinking backwards.
You have a right to drive a car. You have ALWAYS had a right to drive a car or ride a horse. You STILL have a right to drive a car or ride a horse. You can build a car or own a horse and drive/ride it on your property as much as you want.
The government has restricted that right to drive your car/ride your horse on public roads.
Driving is not a privilege, it is a right that has been restricted.
You have the right to do everything. Until you don't.
The second amendment guarantees that the government can't take one right from you. There is no amendment protecting your right to drive a car or ride a horse.
10th, but we digress...
If you want to think those two are hero's to the cause , then who am I to tell you different.
When I'm out cutting wood I don't drag my chainsaw and axe up to the counter at a fast food joint because f*ck you I can .
We used to call it common sense.
Having that picture circulated around as representing the average gun owner makes me cringe. YMMV.
Your strawman arguments are on point today. I'm sure I must have posted that these guys are my hero and people should carry chainsaws and axes around because they can...
It does however say that, lacking enumeration, it is not something the federal government can regulate. Even crossing state lines gives them judicial jurisdiction, but they seem to think that crossing state lines gives them unfettered regulatory discretion as well. I would ask where it says that in the constitution?The 10th was included only to prevent the feds from usurping the ability of the state/locals to regulate shit out of us. State/local .gov's are free (from a US Constitutional standpoint) to steal our rights that aren't enumerated.
It does however say that, lacking enumeration, it is not something the federal government can regulate. Even crossing state lines gives them judicial jurisdiction, but they seem to think that crossing state lines gives them unfettered regulatory discretion as well. I would ask where it says that in the constitution?
Whether a state can regulate driving is another question entirely...
You do NOT have the "right" to keep and bear arms. I'm sick of people saying this because it is being willfully ignorant of the truth.
All your life you have been told that driving is a privilege, correct? You need a license to drive and to bear arms.
Both licenses can be taken away, but there is a big difference. To take one away, forms have to be filled out, due process has to be followed and even with the most egregious offenses by the licensee, you can get the license reinstated eventually.
The other license can be denied you for no reason and taken away on the whim of one person.
One license is good anywhere in the continental US, one is not. Guess which one is which?
There is no "right" to keep and bear arms.
Chipotle sucks anyway....I've never eaten a burrito there that didn't fall apart into a useless mess. they don't even attempt to fold/roll it right.
This place however....is the bomb http://www.tenochmexican.com/ north end and Medford. Probably one of the best burritos I've ever stuffed into my head.
Turns out, it's not really a 'ban' after-all.
http://danaloeschradio.com/chipotle-to-customer-not-a-ban-on-guns/
Turns out, it's not really a 'ban' after-all.
http://danaloeschradio.com/chipotle-to-customer-not-a-ban-on-guns/
————————————–
Subject: Reply from Chipotle
Body:Thanks Kate. You understand how this is hard to decipher for me. So when you say you’ll continue to comply with local laws, you will technically allow concealed carry where it’s allowed in the state, while at the same time encourage people to not do it. Is that accurate?
====
Yes, that is accurate. This is not a ban.
I will NOT enter into any establishment that portrays itself as a gun free zone.Just like Starbucks. Not a ban, just a suggestion to satisfy their majority-liberal customer base. I don't blame them and will keep going there.
OK, I will not bring my gun(s) and my money. you ****ing rainbow, unicorn lovely bunch of fairy dust etc....