- Joined
- Aug 12, 2014
- Messages
- 9,436
- Likes
- 9,053
I thought owning a .40 was sextual preference...
Confused...
I hate to admit it but if I looked around hard enough I must have a 40 somewhere. Definitely never been fired
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
I thought owning a .40 was sextual preference...
Confused...
We waited 6mo for a 1hr call with a Federal Agency to discuss an application, and the guy we had to deal with was a low-level reviewer with a very strong Indian accent, with little command of English, who simply read the Agency’s short written response back to us repeatedly over a noisy phone line. We gave up after 20min. Our legal advisors said we could appeal a second call without another long wait based on the noisy phone line. I said if it’s another call with that guy, we’d be wasting our time. While everyone agreed, I found I’d been chosen for a Communicating with Diverse Colleagues course by HR just a few days later.You can also be fired for things you say outside of work. Almost every company will fire you for lack of wokeness - it's the degree of tolerance for deviation from correctspeak that varies between employers. Some tolerate a degree of debate, others do not. I work for a big company and I would expect decruitment if I started posting on non-work forums that the firm's competitors offered better products.
I had my left index finger replaced with a prosthetic that incorporates a .380 derringer. I can go anywhere armed and nobody is the wiser
I had my left index finger replaced with a prosthetic that incorporates a .380 derringer. I can go anywhere armed and nobody is the wiser
I agree. But in 22 active years in the Union (now retired), I NEVER saw a member speak out at meeting about the blind support of Democrats by the Union. I, was the only one, and that included Steward meetings. I remember some slimeball followed me out and says "If you don't vote Democrat, you shouldn't vote". Yeah, that scrotum licking slimeball was a pathetic tradesman that got on the E Board so that he would get sent out to work. I think the majority of rank and file members are conservative....but keep their heads down to avoid repercussions.Surprisingly there's alot of union people that voted for Trump. It's mostly the business agents and stewards that support democrats.
You should hear the teacher’s union meetings.I agree. But in 22 active years in the Union (now retired), I NEVER saw a member speak out at meeting about the blind support of Democrats by the Union. I, was the only one, and that included Steward meetings. I remember some slimeball followed me out and says "If you don't vote Democrat, you shouldn't vote". Yeah, that scrotum licking slimeball was a pathetic tradesman that got on the E Board so that he would get sent out to work. I think the majority of rank and file members are conservative....but keep their heads down to avoid repercussions.
"Excuse me sir, I think you have me confused with someone who values your opinions".some slimeball followed me out and says "If you don't vote Democrat, you shouldn't vote".
You're incorrect. I always towed the company line. My reviews were always excellent. That's how I was able to go back into the union after being in management. It was looked at as a gift to supervisors who had done well but had decided management wasn't for them.
Your car is an extension of your home, it's your property, they can't tell you what you can/cannot have in your car if it's an open parking lot that is open to the public. If its a secure/gated/guarded parking lot then maybe they could but thats different. Yea they could find another reason to fire you, but if they fire you for keeping a gun locked securely in your car per storage requirements you do have a leg to stand on, been a few cases where people have sued and won on it. Of course, it's not worth the trouble, but if you did end up in that situation and wanted to battle it out you might have a chance.Sure they can tell you that in most places.
And in the places where they can't,
if they find out you're storing a gun in the parking lot,
and it gets their bowels in an uproar, they can fire you on some pretext.
It's a pretty stupid manager who can't pull a rabbit out of that hat.
The reason why you never had a problem,
is because you kept your mouth shut.
You know that.
Jus' sayin'.
Mass doesn't recognize the parking lot issueAbsolutely not a concern. Ever hear about ammo cooking off in Iraq? You could leave a fully loaded mag on the dash in Death Valley.
Any of these cases in Massachusetts?Your car is an extension of your home, it's your property, they can't tell you what you can/cannot have in your car if it's an open parking lot that is open to the public. If its a secure/gated/guarded parking lot then maybe they could but thats different. Yea they could find another reason to fire you, but if they fire you for keeping a gun locked securely in your car per storage requirements you do have a leg to stand on, been a few cases where people have sued and won on it. Of course, it's not worth the trouble, but if you did end up in that situation and wanted to battle it out you might have a chance.
The key here is TRUST NO ONE. Not you best buddy at work, the woman you are dating, you dog or you gerbil. If you go this route remember that two people can keep a secret only if one of them is dead.Company I worked for had that rule. No weapons on the property including the parking lot. LOL! Carried to work everyday for 10 years. No one knew and I didn't tell them. I did warn HR that if they were ever going to have an Active Shooter drill they should probably let a few of us managers in on it. I retired this year, none of them any the wiser. Guess you have to be willing to get fired if they catch you and stick to their policies though.
In all fairness you aren't setting a very high barLol ok bud. I know you're one of the people on this forum who thinks he's the smartest in the room.
In all fairness you aren't setting a very high bar
ETA: there are some wicked smart and talented people on this site (settle down, cowboy, not speaking about you). I'm just a lovable, cuddly, lesbian wiseass
Your rights are protected from the government. You don't have a right to work for that company. That company has the privilege of setting policies for both customers and employees, within the law. If you don't like the policy, you can leave.
According to a 2018 law review article I link belowIIRC, by the mid-1970s there had been a USSC ruling throwing out inappropriate workplace restrictions that were irrelevant to the work.
In a state without a Parking Lot Law?Your car is an extension of your home, it's your property, they can't tell you what you can/cannot have in your car if it's an open parking lot that is open to the public.
Is that distinction because of the fear that guards will break into carsIf its a secure/gated/guarded parking lot then maybe they could but thats different.
When I got out of college I worked for Chase Manhattan at corporate HQ in downtown Manhattan. They had a lot of unwritten dress code rules: Men: Long sleeve dress shirt, tie, blue or gray suit (brown was a major faux pas) although you could wear the tan/olive summer suits as well as seersucker in the Summer. Women: knee length skirt, hose. Flats were ok but heels were better. At your desk and in your department you could remove your jacket. If you got in an elevator or were in any public areas of the building, jackets on (you could take your jacket off in the cafeteria but had to bring it w you). Two newspapers were acceptable to be seen with, NYT or WSJ. NY Post & Daily News were not considered good career moves unless you were in clerical/back office operations in which case you could get away w short sleeve dress shirt w tie and read the Post or the News. Men didn’t have visible piercings and visible ink was also frowned upon.IIRC, by the mid-1970s there had been a USSC ruling throwing out inappropriate workplace restrictions that were irrelevant to the work.
That said I worked for Stone & Webster Engineering in Boston who had posted work rules. They stated that women's skirts had to be a minimum length, hair length (both men and women) could only be so long, IIRC it required women to wear nylons or pantyhose, etc. All this stuff was illegal, but it was enforced. This was all office workers in a secured building.
Companies do what they want wrt enforcing "workplace rules" on employees, sometimes even when said rules are illegal.
When I married the wife 63 years ago she was working for Boston Edison. She had to leave because company was no married women. Jack.IIRC, by the mid-1970s there had been a USSC ruling throwing out inappropriate workplace restrictions that were irrelevant to the work.
That said I worked for Stone & Webster Engineering in Boston who had posted work rules. They stated that women's skirts had to be a minimum length, hair length (both men and women) could only be so long, IIRC it required women to wear nylons or pantyhose, etc. All this stuff was illegal, but it was enforced. This was all office workers in a secured building.
Companies do what they want wrt enforcing "workplace rules" on employees, sometimes even when said rules are illegal.
Go back far enough an a married woman working was considered to be stealing a job from a man. It was also an attempt to "cheat" by getting your family higher on the economic pecking order and tolerating it could cause it to become contagious and increase house prices.When I married the wife 63 years ago she was working for Boston Edison. She had to leave because company was no married women. Jack.
Go back far enough an a married woman working was considered to be stealing a job from a man. It was also an attempt to "cheat" by getting your family higher on the economic pecking order and tolerating it could cause it to become contagious and increase house prices.
The amount of money means nothing. It's where you and your family are on the list sorted by who has how much.And look what happened since the 60's.
I am interested in the idea that you take issue with government breaking the natural right of free association for certain groups under the premise of civil rights purposes, but believe you should be able to enforce the same for the natural right of your choice.I'm saying you SHOULD be able to. Again the government can in fact force a business to not discriminate against people. That's established.
It was a mildly misogynistic wisecrackThe amount of money means nothing. It's where you and your family are on the list sorted by who has how much.
Not familiar with it. Please elaborate.Mass doesn't recognize the parking lot issue