- Joined
- Oct 9, 2007
- Messages
- 11,135
- Likes
- 1,600
Arlington is not a dry town.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
I grew up in Belmont. I never liked it. I was always too feral for suburban life, but I'll advise you nonetheless. Belmont hill is where all the rich folks live and you cant get a house for less than 600 grand. On the other side of town, in the lower lying Waverly area, there's a lot of double and triple deckers and you can find (relatively for the town in question) cheap housing. There's a commuter rail stop on the cheaper side of town and in the town center. The 73 bus services the cheaper area, the 75 services the center and the 78 services the uppity side (all of those buses are out of Harvard square). They used to be target and hunting only for LTCs but apparently they have relaxed their restrictions. Also, be prepared to go to Watertown, Cambridge or Waltham for booze. Belmont was a dry town from prohibition up until a few years back and as far as I know, there's still no decent packies in city limits (I believe the same sort of situation exists in Arlington as well). PM me if you have any other questions.
Seems pretty spot on except a simple house on the hill, nothing big or crazy, will set you back at least $1 million nowadays. Fricken condos converted from two family homes are selling for $600K a unit so its become pretty expensive to buy in. The Waverley side is the worst part of town imo so I would avoid it if possible.
If you're looking to rent a nice simple 2 bedroom in a good neighborhood, try looking for apartments in the southeastern part of town. Cheaper than the hill but nicer than the Waverley area. You'll also be close to Storrow Drive which gets you downtown in like 15 minutes. T ride is pretty easy from there too if you ever use it. Taking it from the hill is more of a pain and Waverley is a much longer bus ride. I would estimate rent to be in the $2K range in that area for a bare bones no frills basic 2 bedroom.
Thanks all for the responses.
For the common questions so far: I'm currently in Somerville and commute to Waltham. The reason for staying closer to Boston is social events plus work-related trips which take me into Boston often enough where I don't want to move too far. I'll be renting in my new place and schools do not matter. From the comments here, Alrington and Belmont seem to fit the bill for green plus location.
On Winchester, I've driven through many times and really like it. There seems to be minimal rental properties though.
Shameless ask as well, but if anyone here is landlord and looking to rent a 1br or 2br property to a fellow 2A supporter, please PM me.
Go to Dedham, Westwood or Norwood....I know people with unrestricted in those towns...
Pretty close to the University train and one other that goes on the other side of Dedham.
If you could be near Route 2 that would make the commute pretty reasonable.Thanks all for the responses.
For the common questions so far: I'm currently in Somerville and commute to Waltham. The reason for staying closer to Boston is social events plus work-related trips which take me into Boston often enough where I don't want to move too far. I'll be renting in my new place and schools do not matter. From the comments here, Alrington and Belmont seem to fit the bill for green plus location.//
Medway, Milford, Franklin.
All green and near the commuter rail line.
Zero crime and good schools.
I work in Boston (financial district). Looked at Arlington and Belmont but bad commute options and their sleepy nature made me pick Waltham - moving in a few weeks north of Main St; very happy with the location.
Medway, Milford, Franklin.
All green and near the commuter rail line.
Zero crime and good schools.
Watertown will also downgrade. Good to hear about Waltham changing. It's still a shitty town lol