17-year-old arrested in killing of 2 people in Kenosha

HARRYM said:
ANTIFA
Click to expand...
...who work for people who look an awful lot like:
iXwlF8d.png
and
World_Economic_Forum_Logo.svg_886167538-1440x899.png


Don't believe for a moment that this shit exists in a vacuum. It's part of an agenda that's being pushed on us.

Some people who are tough enough not to be intimidated by BLM/Antifa might be if their/family's livelihoods came under threat.

Same people - different departments.
 
whatluck said:
can anyone explain to me why a prosecutor would have handbrake on the laptop they use to present video evidence?
Click to expand...
Because he uses it to rip DVDs in his spare time?

Honestly? If I wanted to give benefit of doubt, he receives source videos in whatever format, and converted them to something that runs reliably on his Mac. Obviously, there can be nefarious reasons as well; but I tend to support presumptive innocence, even for dudes with skijump hairdos
 
eboos said:
But here is where the limitless resources come into play. If the case is retried, no sweat off Binger's sack (Krous's is probably always sweating). They will not think twice about retrying. It is not their money, it is the state of Wisconsin's money - the people of Wisconsin's money. Rittenhouse will have to go through this whole ordeal again, with real money being spent - if raised, and while enjoying his constitutional presumption of innocence he will have his freedom curtailed and every aspect of his existence scrutinized.
Click to expand...
does Rittenhouse remain detained ?
 
Mesatchornug said:
Because he uses it to rip DVDs in his spare time?

Honestly? If I wanted to give benefit of doubt, he receives source videos in whatever format, and converted them to something that runs reliably on his Mac. Obviously, there can be nefarious reasons as well; but I tend to support presumptive innocence, even for dudes with skijump hairdos
Click to expand...
His explanation was deliberately taking advantage of the judge's admitted lack of tech knowledge. Luckily the judge is not an idiot and saw this.
 
eboos said:
These people are ridiculous! Asking for a mistrial WITHOUT prejudice? This is coming from the defense.

The state will agree. This is exactly what they want.
Click to expand...
I was listening live while on the road. When the defense started stammering and asking for a mistrial and emphasized without prejudice, I'm guessing the people in traffic around me
could here the loudest WTF they have ever heard. I was happy the feed cut out so I could turn it off. Stomach turning stuff.
 
richc said:
As an attorney what's your best guess to the outcome given the length of time the jury has been out?

Personally I thought it was a slam dunk not guilty. But the jury taking this amount of time makes me wonder if they see it that way?
Click to expand...
I thought it would be a quick NG but then I read last night that two jurors were worried about their personal safety after the trial, so i am thinking it will be a hung jury and the nitwit(imho) prosecution team will get another bite of the apple.
 
eboos said:
You haven't been watching the Rikieta Law panel then. They are all ripping the judge for his tepidness.
Click to expand...

I really think that the panel of lawyers that they are doing in the Rekieta Law channel is going to be an important way of watching our criminal justice system in the future. Maybe it will cause people to question the actions of prosecutors. Otherwise we wouldn't need the innocence project to get people out of jail who were wrongly accused.

Crowd sourcing for innocent people will be an effective tool against crooked prosecutors.
 
richc said:
As an attorney what's your best guess to the outcome given the length of time the jury has been out?

Personally I thought it was a slam dunk not guilty. But the jury taking this amount of time makes me wonder if they see it that way?
Click to expand...

Zimmerman jury took 16 hours and there wasn’t even one video to consider and there were only 2 charges, one scene.
 
whatluck said:
during finals the state had some folders up between videos, clicked on desktop and an icon for 'Handbrake' was there. Trying to get the still now.
Click to expand...
Some of the videos - they needed to circle and title who was who - could it have been used to do that, or is it just change cormats/codecs?

PS: on all video evidence, you cannot tell who is who - wonder why the defense never said "you cannot verify my client is even in frame with the videos"
 

Similar threads

Man Faced 115 Years In Prison & $17 Million In Fines After ATF Falsely Arrested Him
Replies
8
Views
456
Uzi2
U
85-year-old Idaho woman hailed as 'hero' in fatal shooting of home invasion suspect
Replies
7
Views
148
Tartakovsky
Tartakovsky
Grand Jury Declines to Prosecute Texas Mother Who Shot 14-Year-Old Boy During Break-In
Replies
2
Views
165
Agnotology
Agnotology
We need 200 people like this in congress. NH residents, you need this woman in congress.
Replies
14
Views
479
Broc
Broc
2 men found guilty of murder in Jam Master Jay killing
Replies
9
Views
282
inerlogic
inerlogic
Back
Top Bottom