Who the f*** is this whack job?
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
What this nation needs is some enterprising journalistBasically he's just acting like Seth Moulton admitting what he actually wants to do versus the other legislators that lie about not wanting to ban guns.... still same piece of shit, one just wears a hat declaring it other one hides it, but you can smell both
Pistol-Whipping 101, FTW.Why can't we try to find some middle ground. He just needs to rewrite a little.
...
Deductions for qualifying training classes that teach good safety and ways to deescalate without firing the gun.
What this nation needs is some enterprising journalist
to ask the 6.022E23 other Donk candidates, on camera,
whether or not they endorse this guy's agenda.
That'll separate the wheat from the chaff.
Pistol-Whipping 101, FTW.
So sorry, but had to look it up.I haven’t seen Avogadro’s number since forever. Good call.
Enact more restrictions. What else?Yeah that’s great... /s
So essentially lay all the blame for “gun violence” on good people exercising lawful rights by enacting all that crap.
Because to enact that garbage nationally you’d have to detail to the government what your rightfully held defensive tools are... And then when criminals continue to perpetrate the massive majority of crimes, then what smart guy?!
This POS was on a Freakonomics podcast recently.
He also wants a universal tax for universal income.
I had to google this.....I'll agree to everything he wants, on one condition.
I'll give him a first class ticket to Pinochet's helicopter tours, ltd, and I want him to write a review of the premium tour after. Then we'll talk about "reasonable regulations" on guns..
I had to google this.....
Thank god he's not related to me... he was at the annual Asian Gala and I immediately dismissed him when he opened his mouth.... but god @#% this dude is everywhere now.... I have a lot to say but none of it is nice so I won't...
I had to Google this! Not what I was hoping for...
Out the Democrat candidates, Yang's gun control position might be the most moderate out of anyone I've seen (except for some absolute fringe guys I've never heard of, like Wayne Messam). That's saying something.From the comments....
View attachment 276689
His gun policy is retarded. I just think he'll make the D debate pretty entertaining....
As long as belt fed is still okay... hahaTier 3: auto weapons with no high cap mags makes sense. Who doesn't love the thrill of shooting an auto string of 6 whole rounds in a row! Wheeeeee!
This guy is the prime example of the omnipotent moral busy body. Do you think this level of micromanagement will stop at the RKBA's? This guy is a threat to all Americans.
As a gun owner, who would you rather have, Yang and his licensing scheme or Hickenlooper, a member of Everytown? Warren? Kamala Harris? .
Stop! I almost choked on my sammich!His brother Ying is pro gun.
Who the f*** is this whack job?
His policies read like a dystopian, post American country.
Butt-head is little different from the rest of the liberal progressive donks: Buttigieg endorses nationwide gun licensing system...
I haven't heard Pete Buttigieg give a position. He's a vet and from a generally Republican state (Indiana). Could just be a Moulton, though.
Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg unveiled a host of gun control proposals Thursday, including universal background checks and a ban on military-style assault weapons.
As a gun owner, who would you rather have, Yang and his licensing scheme or Hickenlooper, a member of Everytown? Warren? Kamala Harris? All of them want UBC, national red flag, and AWBs. Yang would ban "high capacity magazines" (number not given), but would allow semi-autos with a license (and current gun owners get an exemption from needing to wait to apply for a "tier 2"), give some tax credits, etc. Absolutely not ideal, but at least he's offering some sort of concessions (one of his bullet points to me reads like national reciprocity but with a potential catch).
Out the Democrat candidates, Yang's gun control position might be the most moderate out of anyone I've seen (except for some absolute fringe guys I've never heard of, like Wayne Messam). That's saying something.
As a gun owner, who would you rather have, Yang and his licensing scheme or Hickenlooper, a member of Everytown? Warren? Kamala Harris? All of them want UBC, national red flag, and AWBs. Yang would ban "high capacity magazines" (number not given), but would allow semi-autos with a license (and current gun owners get an exemption from needing to wait to apply for a "tier 2"), give some tax credits, etc. Absolutely not ideal, but at least he's offering some sort of concessions (one of his bullet points to me reads like national reciprocity but with a potential catch).
Once Democrats get a president in and have control of Congress, it'll be BOHICA time barring SCOTUS stepping in.
I haven't heard Pete Buttigieg give a position. He's a vet and from a generally Republican state (Indiana). Could just be a Moulton, though.
I'm not sure you understood my post.You are completely missing the big picture. What concessions is he offering?
It starts with high cap mag ban.
Then it moves to anything over 5 rounds.
Then only fixed mags are allowed.
Then only fixed mags that dont pertrude from the gun.
Then only shotguns and black powder is allowed.
Then only 2 shot shotguns, no slugs. Because who needs more than that for hunting.
And so on until we are left like Britain using plastic butter knives.
I have a better negotiation for you ... we dont add any more laws or stupid sh*t like waiting periods, licenses for this and that, bans on mag capacity and so on.
He is not offering anything. I dont even see where henis offering something. All he is offering is to further advance the ultimate goal of complete gun confiscation and control.
Him offering something would be if he could somehow pass a law and have another law attached to it that said NO ONE can make another change to any gun laws for the next 300 years or so. And there was an easy to enforce it. Then, and only then, I might consider something like "everyone needs a gun license"
The mistake you are emaking is trusting the next government wont want to take more away from us. So, by allowing this guy to take a little, and the next guy to take a little more and so on, soon you are left with nothing.