He looks down on me. He's ten times the dude I'll ever be.
Love and Respect right there. +10000
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS June Giveaway ***Keltec SUB2000***
He looks down on me. He's ten times the dude I'll ever be.
I like that we've all decided I'm writing a paper. I'm done writing papers, thankfully. I'm also not trolling. I'm just a young guy interested in guns. And politics.
Timber: My fellow libtards and I would argue the same for conservative ideals not working. We had 8 years of pretty much unrestricted conservative rule and things went to shit. Things like taxing the wealthy though? How many societies have tried that out? The wealthy are historically pretty good at not getting taxed.
But I REALLY don't want to start that argument. My point is, liberals make the same claim about conservative ideals. Secondly, I don't believe people who have been involved in war have a monopoly on deciding what works. Even if they did, not all of them are in agreement. My grandfather fought in WW2 and would have some choice words for many of you on here.
My fellow libtards and I would argue the same for conservative ideals not working. We had 8 years of pretty much unrestricted conservative rule and things went to shit. Things like taxing the wealthy though? How many societies have tried that out? The wealthy are historically pretty good at not getting taxed.
Whichever one fits best in your mouth.Also, again to avoid cluttering the forum: I've decided that for my first gun I want a .45 1911. Recommendations?
I like that we've all decided I'm writing a paper. I'm done writing papers, thankfully. I'm also not trolling. I'm just a young guy interested in guns. And politics.
Timber: My fellow libtards and I would argue the same for conservative ideals not working. We had 8 years of pretty much unrestricted conservative rule and things went to shit. Things like taxing the wealthy though? How many societies have tried that out? The wealthy are historically pretty good at not getting taxed.
But I REALLY don't want to start that argument. My point is, liberals make the same claim about conservative ideals. Secondly, I don't believe people who have been involved in war have a monopoly on deciding what works. Even if they did, not all of them are in agreement. My grandfather fought in WW2 and would have some choice words for many of you on here.
How do the above 3 questions relate to my ability to have an opinion on such issues, and how do they relate to the other political issues you mentioned (taxing the wealthy, etc)
Wow, where on earth did you get that non-sense?If you want to know, my current working theory is that you have the natural right to own the minimum amount of force that puts you on a (theoretically) level playing field with any other person, including a soldier of the government or just another civilian. Guns are that minimum, whereas tanks are not. There is more to it, but I don't want to write a book and I don't have it all worked out yet, but it seems to me a solid working foundation.
Not really irony, more like causality.The 1911 I'd recommend you buy is unavailable in my state due to gun control laws.
The irony.
We had 8 years of pretty much unrestricted conservative rule and things went to shit. Things like taxing the wealthy though? How many societies have tried that out? The wealthy are historically pretty good at not getting taxed.
The OP doesn't have a clue. She hasn't had any real world experience. She's a college girl trying to poise as a boy to write her term paper about how evil gun owners are.
Robbery, rape and murder are already illegal. Enforce those laws. Don't come after my firearms because a criminal committed one of these with a firearm.if the state had enforced their existing laws, such and such incident wouldn't have been an issue,
I have never alluded, suggested or even thought that gun laws are a good thing.or have alluded to a set of "acceptable" gun laws/restrictions that are not actually enumerated anywhere.
Only after they commit a crime are they a bad person. We keep the guns out of their hands by locking them up. Once a person has served their time I do not believe they should be prohibited for life. If they served the time and paid for their crime all rights should be restored upon release.So I ask you: what, if any, gun regulation do you support in order to keep them out of the hands of bad guys (people seem to generally agree this is a legitimate aim)?
You guys realize that, while compared to people on this forum I might be this super-liberal naive kid, I'm much more in line with the rest of civilized society? I'm surprised some of you can open your mouths in public without being told to get back in the woods.
i wonder what would happen if we did a flash mob open carry... would we be surrounded by S.W.A.T. and their APC?
anyone feel like making on happen?
Gun control ENABLES mass murder on a scale the human race has never seen before.
i wonder what would happen if we did a flash mob open carry... would we be surrounded by S.W.A.T. and their APC?
anyone feel like making on happen?
Do you guys think this should be legal for every day commuting? Just curious. Think it would pass inspection?
View attachment 20066