1. If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

  2. Dismiss Notice

US Supreme Court OT 2018

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Comm2A, Jan 10, 2019.

  1. CatSnoutSoup

    CatSnoutSoup NES Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2015
    Messages:
    2,653
    Likes Received:
    4,394
    Location:
    Westgardminsterham MA
    A.) They are desperate not to have gun control related cases make it before SCOTUS and be judged on the merits.
    B.) In the future if they have the Hill and the White House they well certainly try for restructuring to weight SCOTUS in their favor, especially if Trump gets another justice before he is gone.

    :emoji_tiger:
     

  2. Boston4567

    Boston4567 NES Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2018
    Messages:
    535
    Likes Received:
    461
    Location:
    Merrimack Valley
    Knuckle Dragger likes this.
  3. drgrant

    drgrant Moderator NES Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Messages:
    65,584
    Likes Received:
    21,172
    Would be funny if this backfires on them, there's good reason for liberal justices to be offended by this idea, as well... turning the supreme court into a circus isn't a sound idea regardless of political alignment.

    -Mike
     
    Boston4567 and VetteGirlMA like this.
  4. mlaboss

    mlaboss NES Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2011
    Messages:
    4,042
    Likes Received:
    1,489
    "Stop being so political or else we'll make the court even MORE political!"
     
    xtry51 likes this.
  5. EC1

    EC1 NES Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2007
    Messages:
    6,665
    Likes Received:
    972
    Location:
    Somewhere
    I believe FDR was the first president to suggest this if the court didn't side with him.
     
  6. Knuckle Dragger

    Knuckle Dragger NES Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Messages:
    7,035
    Likes Received:
    3,186
    Location:
    My forest stronghold
    Right. The one surefire way to get 9 justices on the same page is to attack the court’s integrity. They don’t tolerate that shit.
     
    Fritz the Cat likes this.
  7. VetteGirlMA

    VetteGirlMA NES Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2015
    Messages:
    2,516
    Likes Received:
    2,082
    Location:
    western mass
    I'm guessing by the threat level bright red in the liberal camp that they are really worried about the NYS pistol and rifle case? Isn't the supreme court supposed to be a co-equal branch of government?
     
  8. rali

    rali

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2010
    Messages:
    330
    Likes Received:
    187
  9. Bonesinium

    Bonesinium NES Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    14,118
    Likes Received:
    6,497
    Location:
    Southern NH
    Just read their amicus brief. They really did argue to side with them by threatening the court. I can’t imagine that will play particularly well with even the judges who do tend to agree with them. Bold move. Pretty asinine too.
     
    drgrant likes this.
  10. Newtron

    Newtron NES Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    334
    Likes Received:
    171
    KBCraig and rali like this.
  11. wiryone1

    wiryone1

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2013
    Messages:
    564
    Likes Received:
    290
    Yeah, just go and basically threaten the SCOTUS. Lol! Idiotic if they really want things to go their way.
     
  12. rali

    rali

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2010
    Messages:
    330
    Likes Received:
    187
    Doh. Snork. “Never mind”

    I suppose demanding he change his name goes too far?

    R
     
    Newtron likes this.
  13. Knuckle Dragger

    Knuckle Dragger NES Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Messages:
    7,035
    Likes Received:
    3,186
    Location:
    My forest stronghold
    SERE likes this.
  14. crispnipz

    crispnipz

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2017
    Messages:
    281
    Likes Received:
    307
    Location:
    Medford
    :rolleyes: Interesting, I've never heard of a country that didn't allow its citizens to serve in the military but thank goodness for 2A so that won't happen here.

     
  15. Bonesinium

    Bonesinium NES Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    14,118
    Likes Received:
    6,497
    Location:
    Southern NH
    That one is pretty funny. I especially like how he says because Heller is "hotly disputed", that it warrants re-examination. Because that makes sense. They should probably re-examine all non unanimous rulings if that was the logic. Especially relatively recent rulings in which the majority of the justices from Heller are still there now. I'm sure they'd interpret both the 2A and their ruling differently in light of his brief...

    Yep, the the words "keep and" were just mistakes. How dumb of us. "Keep and bear arms" is obviously the same thing as "serve in militia". Everyone knows that.
     
  16. Cap'n Mike

    Cap'n Mike NES Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2016
    Messages:
    350
    Likes Received:
    399
    Location:
    Mass
    So much Bu!!$h!t from Senator Whitehouse.

    “The Court and the country have witnessed an accompanying explosion of strategic “faux” litigation—cases fabricated to bring issues before the Court when litigants presume it will give them policy victories. For example, we have seen flocks of “freedom-based public interest law” organizations that exist only to change public policy through litigation, and which often do not disclose their funders.12 We have seen behavioral signals, like litigants who rush to lose cases in lower courts “as quickly as practicable and without argument, so that [they] can expeditiously take their claims to the Supreme Court” (ordinarily, in litigation, litigants seek to win).

    Sounds exactly like United States vs Miller, the decision that made the infringements of the NFA lawful.

    View: https://youtu.be/H1RjyZ_iZ68
     
    VetteGirlMA likes this.
  17. SERE

    SERE NES Life Member NES Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2010
    Messages:
    4,720
    Likes Received:
    2,944
    Location:
    North of Boston
    He is a little full of himself. Quite a few of his references under "Table of Authorities" are himself. [puke]
     
    Cap'n Mike likes this.
  18. Bonesinium

    Bonesinium NES Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    14,118
    Likes Received:
    6,497
    Location:
    Southern NH
    Pretty sure he pictures himself as Nicolas Cage in the National Treasure movies.
     
    Cap'n Mike likes this.
  19. usp45ct

    usp45ct

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    5,289
    Likes Received:
    1,347
    Location:
    Western Ma

    Hotly contested....right, mention that you feel Roe v Wade should be re-examined and let me know hw that works out.
     
    xtry51 likes this.
  20. Waher

    Waher NES Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2014
    Messages:
    7,359
    Likes Received:
    5,223
    Location:
    BG&RA, BR&PC
    xtry51 and usp45ct like this.
  21. KBCraig

    KBCraig NES Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,245
    Likes Received:
    3,779
    Location:
    Granite State of Mind
    "See-LO-am Springs"?

    LMAO... It's "SI-lome"

    I grew up about 150 miles south of there, in the Ouachita Mountains. Dan Rather was reporting on a plane crash about 15 miles from my home and called it the "OO-ah-CHEE-ta" Mountains. ;)
     
    Cap'n Mike likes this.
  22. T-Unit

    T-Unit

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2018
    Messages:
    1,144
    Likes Received:
    653
    Yeah, but do you really think Breyer, Ginsberg, Sotomayor, and/or Kagan are gonna vote pro 2A just because of a veiled threat, that can't be delivered until 2023 at the earliest? Or that John Roberts won't piss his robes and vote anti-2A, even tho he was in the majority with Heller and Macdonald?

    Even without Roberts, I could see Kagan voting with the conservatives. She seems to be the most libertarian of the Democrat President appointees and apparently went with Scalia to his hunting club.
     
  23. T-Unit

    T-Unit

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2018
    Messages:
    1,144
    Likes Received:
    653
    It's only equal when the left has the majority, otherwise it's illegitimate.

    Yes, the anti gunners are terrified of the NY case, they know there's no excuse that justified its existence when about every other state or locality allows those who own guns to transport them. That's why NYC changed the law, but given the overwhelming leftness of NYC, they could easily change it back.

    Even if SCOTUS didn't dismiss the case, it's all but a guarantee if Dems get the White House and the senate they will pack the court. Since it's no longer a 4-4-1 or 5-4 liberal majority, they are convulsing at the thought of more SCOTUS rulings not going their way and they need the judiciary at all levels to proceed long after they're all gone.

    Remember, to the new Socialist Democrats, there can be no dissent.
     
  24. VetteGirlMA

    VetteGirlMA NES Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2015
    Messages:
    2,516
    Likes Received:
    2,082
    Location:
    western mass
    Interestingly in the Heller case a number of republican senators and representatives filed an amicus brief and I wonder if we will see that again or if it will be crickets.
     
    Cap'n Mike and CatSnoutSoup like this.
  25. Boston4567

    Boston4567 NES Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2018
    Messages:
    535
    Likes Received:
    461
    Location:
    Merrimack Valley
    I think it's not totally impossible, given the extraordinary attempts from the left to quash this case and delegitimize the court, for there to be a unanimous or near-unanimous ruling that results in a very narrow extension of 2A to "bear" in addition to "keep".

    Something like, "not all who join this opinion agreed with Heller, but given its findings, there also exists a right to bear arms in addition to a right to keep them, although we will not expound on the details of the extent of that right."

    Remember, Caetano was a unanimous ruling of this sort, that said stun guns were protected by 2A. The liberal justices may decide that uniting behind a small extension of 2A while standing up in defense of the court's independence is better than letting the conservatives win anyway and write a sweeping ruling that pushes 2A much further and polarizes the public's view of the court. Roberts is much more of a uniter than a divider, so he may agree, and threaten to dump the case for mootness if the court's other conservatives don't play along.
     
  26. Knuckle Dragger

    Knuckle Dragger NES Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Messages:
    7,035
    Likes Received:
    3,186
    Location:
    My forest stronghold
    In Caetano, the SJC effectively tried to reverse Heller and thumbed their nose at SCOTUS. It's as if their ruling was based upon Breyer's dissent, not the majority opinion. I still recall Justice Botsford's quip in another case ..'well at least the supreme court says it's an individual right'.
     
    Cap'n Mike likes this.
  27. SFC13557

    SFC13557 NES Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2019
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    56
    Location:
    Central Ma.
    The Leftists are scared and desperate, Trump has rattled them to the core. Time to go Ruthie.
     
    Cap'n Mike and Gak44 like this.
  28. Boston4567

    Boston4567 NES Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2018
    Messages:
    535
    Likes Received:
    461
    Location:
    Merrimack Valley
    Agreed 100%, but in Caetano the liberals could have refused to go along to get along, forced a full written decision, and given forceful dissents repudiating Heller/McDonald and also attempting to distinguish Caetano from Heller.

    Instead, we got a unanimous per curiam opinion affirming that 2A is the law of the land and that you can't ban an entire class of weapon. So the liberal wing of the court might be OK with moving the 2A ball forward slowly and incrementally in order to avoid a 5-4 split that results in a broad, unfavorable ruling.
     

Share This Page