If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
SSS"Intruders will be able to sue for injuries"
What intruder?
I have no idea what that car is doing there officer if I see someone I'll let them know you towed it"Intruders will be able to sue for injuries"
What intruder?
It just goes to show that even in "conservative" states there are districts where you can get elected and re-elected with this kind thinking. A creeping cancer on the country.These politicians are A disgrace. I don't know how in her head she can justify that. It just goes to show you how out of touch with reality a lot of these people are. Even worse these nut jobs are trying to past legislation and dictate how the rest of country should live.
TTAG had an article on this too. Same conclusion.This is semi-fake.
The politician is real, but the quoted section isn't her actual work or real quotes, it's conservative satire.
"Language in the post can be traced back to a Dec. 5 blog written by the conservative humorist John Semmens, who confirmed to The Associated Press it was a work of satire based on the real bill. However, his post is being shared as real on social media."
CLAIM: A bill introduced in Texas by Democratic state Rep. Terry Meza would repeal the state’s “castle doctrine” law, which allows a homeowner to use deadly force against an armed intruder. The bill, HB 196, would require the homeowner to “flee the home” at the first sign of intrusion, and if fleeing is not possible, “cooperate with the intruder.”
AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. Meza’s bill would not repeal the state’s “castle doctrine” law, and it wouldn’t alter actions Texans may currently take during a home invasion. Instead, it would amend the state penal code to require Texas residents to retreat if possible if someone outside the home threatens them or their property. Meza’s bill doesn’t instruct homeowners to “cooperate” with an intruder, nor does it prevent them from using deadly force in self-defense if they are unable to retreat.
![]()
NOT from Babylon Bee
Meanwhile in Irving, Tx... State Representative Terry Meza (D-Irving) has introduced HB196. Her bill would repeal the state's castle doctrine that allows a homeowner to use deadly force against an armed intruder who breaks into his home. “I'm not saying that stealing is okay," Meza explained...www.northeastshooters.com
I'm sure the politician is a POS and I would not support this bill, however the social media post in the OP is false info which makes gun owners look bad, in my opinion.TTAG had an article on this too. Same conclusion.
![]()
New Bill Would Require Texans to Retreat From Attacks, Ban Deadly Force to Protect Property - The Truth About Guns
◀Previous Post Next Post▶ Lone Star Gun Rights is alerting Texans to a bill pre-filed by Texas Rep. Terry Meza; HB 196: AN ACT relating to the use of deadly force in defense of a person or property. Per LSGR: …a very worrying piece of legislation was introduced by Irving State...www.thetruthaboutguns.com
I'm sure the politician is a POS and I would not support this bill, however the social media post in the OP is false info which makes gun owners look bad, in my opinion.
I mean, the bill allows you to defend yourself if you're in your home, including with lethal force if you can't retreat. So probably.I wonder if this dingbat would call the cops if thieves showed up at her house to rob her. I mean being a legislator and all she must have some good stuff lying around just waiting to be redistributed. She can sit outside in her yard with an accomplice holding a gun to her head you know for 'cooperation' purposes. Afterwards she can tell us all how liberating and life fulfilling it was to give up her personal possessions at gun point.
In an age where you can google something's validity in about two seconds, people seem awfully quick to forward/post stuff without doing any checking on it.Everything posted on the internet should be treated as satire.
In an age where you can google something's validity in about two seconds, people seem awfully quick to forward/post stuff without doing any checking on it.
Reminds me how I was reading the other day a sports publication included a fake quote from a Lebron James parody account. The guy made his account look similar and included a fake "Verified" logo and the website printed the tweets as if they were actually from Lebron himself. Gotta get that scoop!
I also get a kick out of when celebrities don't realize they're interacting with a parody account. One guy posted a screenshot of a male pornstar and said "this is my cousin, he died fighting for your freedoms, I'd appreciate a shout out" and he got some politician to say like "my condolences, I thank him for his service" lollol, i love when legacy media picks up troll news
I also get a kick out of when celebrities don't realize they're interacting with a parody account. One guy posted a screenshot of a male pornstar and said "this is my cousin, he died fighting for your freedoms, I'd appreciate a shout out" and he got some politician to say like "my condolences, I thank him for his service" lol
The word trolling itself has been largely diluted. In its original form, it was intended to be indistinguishable from sincere posting.Well, if they reply you get a lot of eyeballs. It takes a very light touch to troll well. Most people are in it for shock and awe. Excellent trolling is indistinguishable from high level retardation.
View attachment 459200
I wonder if this dingbat would call the cops if thieves showed up at her house to rob her. I mean being a legislator and all she must have some good stuff lying around just waiting to be redistributed. She can sit outside in her yard with an accomplice holding a gun to her head you know for 'cooperation' purposes. Afterwards she can tell us all how liberating and life fulfilling it was to give up her personal possessions at gun point.