ExactlyYou mean like, lawless, leftist, baby killing insurrectionists?
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
ExactlyYou mean like, lawless, leftist, baby killing insurrectionists?
...meanwhile - and certainly if they jettison Roe - the Donks WILL pack the court.
In either instance, I wouldn't bet on a dearth of cases, especially if the Donks do (or look like they will) pack the court.Let's say they pack the court. Big deal. It will be decades before another abortion case gets to scotus. As far as gun cases who cares. Let's jump on the defund the police bandwagon today and defund local/state/fbi the whole damn thing. Gonna be tough taking someone's gun when all you can do is throw glitter at someone.
In either instance, I wouldn't bet on a dearth of cases, especially if the Donks do (or look like they will) pack the court.
To be fair, the left offered nothing of substance, so his takedown was mere childs play. The entire dissent was some faggot moonbat clerk spilling out their feels. It's as if they just gave up.I know it's been brought up earlier but Alito's concurring opinion on the case slaps the shit out of the dissenting libs and blows away all the idiotic lib reasoning for restrictive gun control/laws. He really laid the law down for the 2nd Amendment critics and told them they have no legal standing.
What they're after (and "they" isn't just what we'd ordinarily call The Left):Okay but now there is precedent. It will take very special judge shopping to find judges that thumb their noses at scotus now. Over 200+ year of history scotus has had to overturn bad decisions made especially those in the aftermath of the civil war. Nothing new. Cruikshank, Plessey, Dredd Scott and today Roe.
Let's be honest. The left wants to destroy the country in order to implement, I don't know what, direct democracy type of government? They'll like that until they are voted out of power and their ideas are shot down by the people, then they will be crying for a constitution. They lack the ability to win at the ballot box and for decades they have pinned all of their hopes on wins in the courts.
Let's be honest here, Roe is another example of a legal fiction just like qualified immunity.
What they're after (and "they" isn't just what we'd ordinarily call The Left):
A China-style totalitarian bureaucracy for EVERYONE worldwide. Especially the US, that happens to have (had?) a freedom tradition and culture.The Great Reset Megathread
Let's begin right from the horses' ass: https://www.weforum.org/great-reset/ Time Magazine: https://time.com/collection/great-reset/www.northeastshooters.com
Let's be honest. The left wants to destroy the country in order to implement, I don't know what, direct democracy type of government?
Nope, they want communism, pure and simple: the “rulers” and “the ruled.”Let's say they pack the court. Big deal. It will be decades before another abortion case gets to scotus. As far as gun cases who cares. Let's jump on the defund the police bandwagon today and defund local/state/fbi the whole damn thing. Gonna be tough taking someone's gun when all you can do is throw glitter at someone.
Nope, they want communism, pure and simple: the “rulers” and “the ruled.”
...which is why disarming us is so important to them.That's all fine and dandy but the citizens of the US outgun the rest of the worlds armies combined. Good luck with that.
Correct!...which is why disarming us is so important to them.
Of course, if the People are unwilling to use those arms - which to date has been the case - it's academic anyway.
Footnote 9 of the decision, citations omitted, highlights mine:
To be clear, nothing in our analysis should be interpreted to suggest the unconstitutionality of the 43 States’ “shall-issue” licensing regimes, under which “a general desire for self-defense is sufficient to obtain a [permit].” Because these licensing regimes do not require applicants to show an atypical need for armed self-defense, they do not necessarily prevent “law-abiding, responsible citizens” from exercising their Second Amendment right to public carry. Rather, it appears that these shall-issue regimes, which often require applicants to undergo a background check or pass a firearms safety course, are designed to ensure only that those bearing arms in the jurisdiction are, in fact, “law-abiding, responsible citizens". And they likewise appear to contain only “narrow, objective, and definite standards” guiding licensing officials, rather than requiring the “appraisal of facts, the exercise of judgment, and the formation of an opinion" -- features that typify proper-cause standards like New York’s. That said, because any permitting scheme can be put toward abusive ends, we do not rule out constitutional challenges to shall-issue regimes where, for example, lengthy wait times in processing license applications or exorbitant fees deny ordinary citizens their right to public carry.Thomas must have been writing this for years, considering the number of conditions he considered. Now, getting the lower courts to actually apply the ruling may be a bigger issue.
Not just a several month wait and fees but hopefully this can also address the fact that some states make you appear in person as part of the process.
That can be a massive burden to travel to another state (unarmed) wether it be one state over or across the country.
I finally understand what they mean when they say “PROGRESS”.
It’s “progress towards COMMUNISM”, full and unbridled power over us.
View: https://twitter.com/barackobama/status/1540164204107337729?s=21&t=Lbj2YBphAYHn2bzzlV6lCA
Respectfully, we have a thread for that conversation.Correct!
There are cases in the pipeline. That seems likely.How about getting rid of the 10 round mag BS next SC?
And the Professors who "educated" him on the evilness of America. Don't these elitist Professors realize they will be the first to disappear if the left wins a Civil War and we become a Communist/Socialist country? Who did Stalin, Mao, Fidel, Ho, etc. go after first when they took power by violent revolution? Morons!You know it is POS like him which will lead this nation to a second civil war !
I would but it's hard to walk with this thingperhaps its time to seek out a doctor?