- Joined
- Jan 25, 2008
- Messages
- 7,387
- Likes
- 12,632
Just thinking out loud here - if the AG's new interpretation of what defines an assault weapon stands then the conclusion would be that the State was not correctly enforcing the laws and allowed us to purchase weapons, etc. that are illegal, right? So what liability does the AG's office and State have? Is a class action lawsuit against the AG's Office/State viable? Healey is essentially saying that the State has not correctly enforced the laws for 18 years and has now left us out to hang because we bought firearms that we assumed the State says was OK to buy (the sales were processed through the State for all these years). Thoughts?