If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Gawd, I hate this state sometimes.
Copy/duplicate is not an actual law
... still fails the "copy and duplicates" edict ....
How do you even hold with that grip?
sometimes?
Why would anyone in a real state ever buy something neutered to comply with retarded state rules???
Grips like that are a CA based thing.does it work in MA? who knows, noone should have one.
The other feature of rugers "ar" is a barrel thread protector...pretty stupid since it Would have to be pinned in place to be legal in any of the advertised states..
Then the issue of detachable mags, which I can only assume has a bullet button or some variation there of......
Because there are entities out there that want us all to only own the 50 State Compliant version. By making one available they are one step closer to making it happen.
Then they will rationalize that we all need single shot firearms, then...
Death by 1000 cuts.
Ah, I never thought of that. Didn't Ruger do questionable stuff (with respect to 2A) before? So did S&W but that was ratio sized to the British owners.
Ruger received criticism from some gun owners for suggesting that rather than ban guns, that Congress should outlaw magazines holding more than 15 rounds.[9] On March 30, 1989, Bill Ruger sent a letter to every member of the United States Congress, stating:
The best way to address the firepower concern is therefore not to try to outlaw or license many millions of older and perfectly legitimate firearms (which would be a licensing effort of staggering proportions) but to prohibit the possession of high capacity magazines. By a simple, complete and unequivocal ban on large capacity magazines, all the difficulty of defining 'assault rifle' and 'semi-automatic rifles' is eliminated. The large capacity magazine itself, separate or attached to the firearm, becomes the prohibited item. A single amendment to Federal firearms laws could effectively implement these objectives
Her edict is not law!! The law is what we've been following since the fed ban expired. Not complying with her bullshit violates NOTHING but her delicate sensibilities. Oh and she knows this. Which is why she would never sue for false advertising. Because she knows they ARE legal in MA and trying that stunt would be the fastest was to get her bullshit in a courtroom and summarily dismissed. Then SHE could be sued my any person in MA who feels they are an aggrieved party. It would all be fair game at that point. Anything from PTSD from the stress her edict created to civil rights violations. A class action suit could cost the state hundreds of millions.