-
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
-
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
RB Ginsberg openly admits to wanting to reverse Heller
- Thread starter durask
- Start date
Why are we suffering under activist judges who think that the constitution is open to interpretation based upon their feelings? It's only going to get worse, too.
yeah, I don't get this. SCOTUS isn't supposed to make a decision based on what they think is popular at the time. They have already effed this republic up enough as it is. The 4-4 decision on the last immigration issues they heard should tell everyone that 4 of them are not qualified to be there as they have no objectivity. Hint: it wouldn't be the 4 that agreed with the bill.
I hope that old bag is the victim of human spontaneous combustion. She is certainly full of enough hot gas to start the process.![[puke2]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/031.gif "Puke2 [puke2]")
She's a sack of dried dog shit. Highly combustible.
ProGun
NES Member
The SCOTUS is one huge reason people need to vote Trump. Those of you thinking about staying home on election day need to think about the damage Hitlery could do with her selections to the Court.
This is especially important if you're in a swing state like NH.
This is especially important if you're in a swing state like NH.
GlockJock
NES Member
Was visiting one of the wife's elderly aunts recently at the Don Orione Nursing Home in Eastie... Literally 95 percent of all the old bats playing bingo or sitting out in the courtyard semi-napping looked like they were in better shape mentally, physically and looked much more alert and aware than Justice GunsBurn does even when she's posing for a photo op with the other justices. And I'm NOT even kidding or being sarcastic...
Ruthie is one of the best arguments for Supreme term limits in the history of the court. The fact that these "brilliant" justices (aka lawyers who played the schmooze game so well when young that they got the ultimate lifetime kiss by whoever appointed them) are around til they hit the funeral parlor is a joke, and a bad one at that...
Hell, my Mom is the same age as GunsBurn but Mom is a lot younger than her mentally, etc, and you can tell has all her wits still. Versus Ruthie, who looks and acts like she should have been doing the Cream of Wheat thing at the Don Orione about ten years ago, never mind today! WTF?
Ruthie is one of the best arguments for Supreme term limits in the history of the court. The fact that these "brilliant" justices (aka lawyers who played the schmooze game so well when young that they got the ultimate lifetime kiss by whoever appointed them) are around til they hit the funeral parlor is a joke, and a bad one at that...
Hell, my Mom is the same age as GunsBurn but Mom is a lot younger than her mentally, etc, and you can tell has all her wits still. Versus Ruthie, who looks and acts like she should have been doing the Cream of Wheat thing at the Don Orione about ten years ago, never mind today! WTF?
Shark_Cage
NES Member
I said it before.
1. Natural laws (rights)cannot be revoked.
2. We are morally obligated to not one at unjust laws.
1. Natural laws (rights)cannot be revoked.
2. We are morally obligated to not one at unjust laws.
Horrible
NES Member
Bitch says she will roll out of US if Trump wins. A solid reason to call her on this and vote for DJT?
http://nypost.com/2016/07/11/even-ruth-bader-ginsburg-weighs-fleeing-us-if-trump-wins/
So now that she has offered her opinion on Heller and her desire to nullify the decision using future 2A cases, we can expect her to recuse herself from future 2A cases due to her inherent bias against pro-2A appellants.
I have heard she has made blatant anit-Trump comments as well. If that's true and the election comes down to a SCOTUS challenge that bitch better recuse herself but I know she won't.
Wouldn't it be refreshing if SCOTUS justices ruled according to the law and the Constitution instead of according to their personal agendas? I know, I know, I am a dreamer.
Every office and appointment should have some form of term limit. SCOTUS justices should also have to pass a cognitive test to prove they are mentally lucid enough to do the job as well as a Constitutional law test every year. Part of those tests should include scenarios where their interpretations can be judged as Constitutional or not. Too many wrong answers and they are of the SCOTUS. Now, who corrects the tests and how do we make sure they are impartial and competent?
Wouldn't it be refreshing if SCOTUS justices ruled according to the law and the Constitution instead of according to their personal agendas? I know, I know, I am a dreamer.
Every office and appointment should have some form of term limit. SCOTUS justices should also have to pass a cognitive test to prove they are mentally lucid enough to do the job as well as a Constitutional law test every year. Part of those tests should include scenarios where their interpretations can be judged as Constitutional or not. Too many wrong answers and they are of the SCOTUS. Now, who corrects the tests and how do we make sure they are impartial and competent?
![[thinking]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/010.gif "Thinking [thinking]")
I think so but that will never happen. If it does, you can bet the Rs and Ds will turn that into a circus/pissing contest just like they do with everything else.
Shark_Cage
NES Member
She must have been something before electricity.
kevin9
NES Member
I think you're being exceedingly generous:
I find the contrast between her and Scalia striking. As I recall, Scalia would talk about the reasoning and rational for the decisions he'd made. She seems to present no logic or reason, just this and that were bad decisions and should be changed. Typical progressive emotion and agenda versus Scalia's logic and reason based conservatism.
According to this, impeachment. Then again, I could probably find another site that says no. My understanding of the life sentences was to remove politics from the SCOTUS, I doubt the founders foresaw the abortion that has become the SCOTUS, or the country in general.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2543298/posts
I think you're being exceedingly generous:
Yeeesh!
It reminds me of a face I saw one on a Totem Pole.
![[shocked]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/007.gif "Shocked [shocked]")
If it would get that crazy bitch off the Supreme Court and out of my rights, I would vote for Trump and pay for her airfare and moving expenses.
Donald J. Trump ✔@realDonaldTrump
Justice Ginsburg of the U.S. Supreme Court has embarrassed all by making very dumb political statements about me. Her mind is shot - resign!
12:54 AM - 13 Jul 2016
Am I the only one or does that broad remind anyone else of the Skeksis from The Dark Crystal movie I saw when I was a kid?
Back when I was a kid she was a big star already:
