doctorbossman
NES Member
Hope it's not a dupe.
Philadelphia father of two shoots, kills home intruder - U.S. News
Philadelphia father of two shoots, kills home intruder - U.S. News
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
"so called castle docterine" i wonder how the writer if this article views guns... i wish he got both. punk ass kids
the armed intruders confronted Heng and a struggle ensued. During the scuffle, Heng opened fire
Good on this man for defending his family.
Agreed good for this homeowner protecting his family....
"You don't have time to think," said the 63-year-old South Philadelphia homeowner, husband and father of two. "They came like lightning."
better hit hit rate than most cops (comment not meant to insult any cops here, you guys might be a better shot than me, no sarcasm intended, so please dont jump all over me)Warms the cockles of my heart! Only down side is he didn't get to blast the second thug!
If the other perp is ever caught he will held criminally liable for the death and be charged with the murder of his associate according to the legal doctrine of "Felony Murder."
The Felony-Murder rule usually does not apply to the death of a co-conspirator, although I haven't checked PA law to see if they would apply it here.
No. It's about killing of innocents, not perps.What? That is exactly what the Felony Murder rule is all about:
The felony-murder rule originated in England under the Common Law. Initially it was strictly applied, encompassing any death that occurred during the course of a felony, regardless of who caused it. Therefore, if a police officer attempting to stop a Robbery accidentally shot and killed an innocent passerby, the robber could be charged with murder.
Felony murder rule (Pennsylvania) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
the Court reasoned that the predicate for application of the felony murder rule was missing. Because the co-felon's death resulted from the policeman's lawful efforts to stop the robbers, the resulting death was deemed a justifiable homicide and not a murder. Commonwealth v. Redline, 391 Pa. 486 (Pa Supreme Court 1958)