If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
The AP is garbage. Whole article is wringing its hands over climate change but doesn’t actually attribute the owl problem to climate change.
No, it doesn’t.
The whole article was about one owl out naturing another owl. But I suppose it’s easier to just ignore the article and claim it’s about something it isn’t on the basis you dislike the source. That’s rather illogical, guy.
Restoring landscapes and species in a world damaged by climate change. Explore AP's in-depth series: What Can Be Saved
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service experiment, which began in 2015, has raised thorny questions: To what extent can we reverse declines that have unfolded over decades, often due partially to actions by humans? And as climate change continues to shake up the landscape, displacing species and altering how and where plants and animals live and thrive, how should we intervene?
“It’s going to be very common with climate change,” Harris said. “What are we going to do — pick and choose the winners?”
So your against coyote hunting in principal?Humans should never intervene. In anything. Anywhere.
EVER.
Yo, Prime Directive.So your against coyote hunting in principal?
I've killed many a nuisance critter when I was living on the farm. Coyote, crow, woodchuck. Really it's the mindset that bothers me. Protecting the herd from predators is the farmers job. The lazy farmer petitions the government to kill every single coyote on his behalf so he doesn't have to mend his stock fence and keep guard dogs or guard mules. The occasional killing of a couple coyotes is just an unfriendly reminder to the coyote population that this area is dangerous. Please find food elsewhere.So your against coyote hunting in principal?
So your against coyote hunting in principal?