Your statement bold for clarity........Are you on drugs?
Actually, a veritable pharmacy, but nothing scheduled or mind altering. I draw my conclusions based on observations of recent history.
I am not referring to the kind of creeping gun grab that the enemy is always trying to slip in, or the Beto kind of stuff. That kind of stuff obviously gets more traction in states dominated by elitist liberals.
I am referring to the knee-jerk reaction of "OMG, TEOTWAWKI, we cant have ordinary people running around with guns". You tend to see this kind of emergency action like "emergency powers no guns may be carried" in traditionally pro-gun states. Katrina saw the LA cops literally going door to door to steal guns, but the disaster on Long Island, where there are numerous licensed gun owners but they are in the minority and few carry, did not prompt any adverse action.
There is also a correlation between "Shall issue" and garbage like binding signage; prohibited zones; etc. Here in MA the only state prohibited zones are schools, the surface of the ocean within 500ft of Logan airport, and placed administratively prohibited like courthouses. This may be correlation without causality, and could be based more on the fact that shall issue laws tend to be more recent than may issue ones.
Go down to TX and you'll find the 30.06 and 30.07 signage law. Head out to UT and churches may declare themselves "gun free zones", then give their designated favored people carry permission (and the LDS has already registered as a no-gun zone). Or look at MI where they went from may to shall issue and, in doing so, added some prohibited places. Heck, I have fewer restrictions on where I can carry in MA than I would in Arizona or Texas. I can't carry in a "place of nuisance" in FL. When you figure out exactly what that is please let me know, and fill me in on the Zoobow thing as well.
When I had lunch with a colleague in WA, he was open carrying and had tell the hostess that he needed seating that was not in the posted over 21 area because he was armed. The area was rather pro-gun; his being visibly armed did not cause any concern other than finding us another table; but it would have been a crime for him to take a table in the wrong section of the restaurant. Not so in most shall-issue states. Even pro-gun (at the time) VA had a restaurant ban to go along with shall issue. TX requires you carry an accountant with you to audit any restaurant before you go in to make sure that alcohol sales are not 51% or more of revenue, and entering such an establishment armed is a crime.
Maine is an exception as it is both constitutional carry and shall issue, but signs in bars (only) are legally binding.
Go to a hospital in MA? Sure, I might violate a policy (as did the individual who took out someone who was stabbing an MD ass Mass General and saved her life), but in TX it would be a crime as pretty much all hospitals have 30.06/30.07 signs. Oh, and the anti-gun states of MA and NY have no concept of a "binding signage" law for carry permit holders.