Obama pushing gun control treaty hard

Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Messages
641
Likes
32
Location
Galt's Gulch
Feedback: 1 / 0 / 0
Lou Dobbs segment on this old international gun-control treaty that Obama has dredged up. Apparently, he's serious about pushing hard for this.

As we've discussed, this would create a national registry for all gun owners and would give foreign countries access to this registry! It could also potentially do away with home reloading.

Is this guy trying to start a new civil war?

Thanks alot, Obama voters. Feeling a little queasy yet?
 
Say, where ARE those guys lately?

Here they are [smile]

headass.jpg
 
Boating Accident. If I had only been quicker: The effing boat flipped right over in a rogue wave. Three safes and 1000's of rounds... I am still crying myself to sleep. [crying]

My boat was saved since it was a Whaler: Hence why I am updating the blog tonight and not sleeping with my guns a few hundred feet down.
 
Say, where ARE those guys lately?

They seem to have dissappeared awfully quick. Conveniently... [rolleyes]
They were up in everyones face when the savior was first elected, but when the messiah turned out to be the anti-christ, they blammed someone else and went into hidding. As they always do. [thinking]
 
They seem to have dissappeared awfully quick. Conveniently... [rolleyes]
They were up in everyones face when the savior was first elected, but when the messiah turned out to be the anti-christ, they blammed someone else and went into hidding. As they always do. [thinking]

One or two of them reappear about once a month. I won't name names. They pop in and play nice, and avoid these ... controversies. I had them pegged for DU interlopers from the get-go.

But what do I know? I'm just some old guy who knows what poop smells like.
 
So what if hes pushing for gun control? The government has checks and balances for a reason. Speak to your state rep, or dont vote for him/her if they arent representing you properly.

They seem to have dissappeared awfully quick. Conveniently...
They were up in everyones face when the savior was first elected, but when the messiah turned out to be the anti-christ, they blammed someone else and went into hidding. As they always do.

Im not sure who you think "they" are but the majority of the people who voted for "the messiah" think hes the shit. They havent changed their opinions.
 
So what if hes pushing for gun control? The government has checks and balances for a reason. Speak to your state rep, or dont vote for him/her if they arent representing you properly.

[laugh] Say what?

Are you a Conservative/Libertarian/Constitutionalist living in MA or similar blue state?
 
Say, where ARE those guys lately?

So what if hes pushing for gun control? The government has checks and balances for a reason. Speak to your state rep, or dont vote for him/her if they arent representing you properly.



Im not sure who you think "they" are but the majority of the people who voted for "the messiah" think hes the shit. They havent changed their opinions.


Here's another one ! [troll] [laugh]
 
Problem with liberals they don't realize the implications of what they stand for. "Oh it'll never come to that" or "Obama would never push for that" etc. Hmm pre-war Germans thought the same way about Hitler.... until it was too late. If you don't think the USA could possibly become a socialist nation just watch and do nothing.
 
So what if hes pushing for gun control? The government has checks and balances for a reason. Speak to your state rep, or dont vote for him/her if they arent representing you properly.



Im not sure who you think "they" are but the majority of the people who voted for "the messiah" think hes the shit. They havent changed their opinions.

I just wanted to say hi to you and give you all the welcome you deserve, although you won't be around much longer.
 
So what if hes pushing for gun control? The government has checks and balances for a reason. Speak to your state rep, or dont vote for him/her if they arent representing you properly.



Im not sure who you think "they" are but the majority of the people who voted for "the messiah" think hes the shit. They havent changed their opinions.

I'm sure you stumbled on here by mistake thinking this was a hunting site, so let us be nice and help you out a bit.

Sadly, the so called "check and ballance" system only really works if you have both parties with equal control. Currently, the Lib Dems have control of everything thanks to the Bush admin. so unfortunately, the "ballance" you speak of, has little representation.

Hopefully, the mid road dems will see this as a killer for them in the polls in their states and not side with the obamazobies.

but, there is a reason that none of the other prior Presidents would sign this, and that reason has little to do with 'gun control' and a lot to do with ensuring that the US stays a FREE Nation not bound by laws of other nations.

Obama is too stupid to see that and too much of an idealist to think that making friends with everyone in the world will magically love the US of A.
 
Last edited:
Im not sure who you think "they" are but the majority of the people who voted for "the messiah" think hes the shit. They havent changed their opinions.

I love this. The liberals win one election by a few percent and think that everyone fully supports Obama's agenda in its totality. We are still in the honeymoon period and once that is over (very soon) it will only take pissing off a few of the people that voted for him to tip the scales. More gun control and donations of our tax dollars to ACORN should do the trick.
 
So what if hes pushing for gun control? The government has checks and balances for a reason. Speak to your state rep, or dont vote for him/her if they arent representing you properly.

Maybe I am misinterpreting what you are saying, but I am assuming that the "Checks and Balances" you refer to are the one enumerated in the Constituition. If so, those Checks and Balances refer to the Three Branches of the Federal Government (Executive, Legislative, and Judicial) checking each other, NOT checks and balances on the citizens of this nation applied by its government.
 
Some of you really should be ashamed of yourselves ! This is an open forum, and instead of trying to educate Smeed, you are really being kind of rude and unwelcoming. The inability of so many people to disagree without being disagreeable is absolutely staggering. I guess it is a sign of the times. We are definitely not the friendly forum we used to be, in my opinion.

Look..we all have known that the other shoe is going to drop with the Prez with regard to gun control. It is a given that it is not an if, but a when. I would have predicted a bit further down the road, but the first 100 days have been disappointing to the Obamanians. Those who thought he was the best thing since sliced bread, are beginning to see that nothing is really changing, the wars go on, the economy sucks, so he has to pull some kind of rabbit out of his hat. By supporting this gun control measure, he gets the Mexicans off of his back (they are blaming us not their totally corrupt systems for all the violence and crime down there) and he makes his Obamanians feel good by promoting some "feel good" legislation. You can't diss any minorities or religious groups or people with nonconventional sexual orientation, so who is left? Gunowners...everybody hates us because we either are bambi blasters or Nazi's.

So, suck it up boys and girls 'cuz you ain't seen nothin' yet. I fear that the S**tstorm is coming down hard and fast.

Smeed, you are waaaaay too naive, everyone has polarized, there is seldom any compromise on many issues today. Your idealism is commendable and reflects the viewpoint expoused in high school civics class in about the year 1963 (although you must have missed the lecture on "checks and balances" please refer to post 19). I am certainly no conservative (I don't buy into the anti-gay thing or the anti-abortion thing, or the prayer in the school thing plus I'm a union f**kwad who works for the state which according to some makes me bad and worthless) but we gotta stand together on gun issues, because the "system" is going to screw us really, really bad if we don't. In the end nobody is going to help us, but us.

Mark056
 
Last edited:
So what if hes pushing for gun control? The government has checks and balances for a reason. Speak to your state rep, or dont vote for him/her if they arent representing you properly.



Im not sure who you think "they" are but the majority of the people who voted for "the messiah" think hes the shit. They havent changed their opinions.

If you truly value your natural right to own a firearm ( if you don't know what this means look it up) - and if you had any idea of the history of gun control in this country, you would not take such a cavalier attitude.

If Obama was half the constitutional scholar he claims to be - then he would not even attempt to have any further gun control - on the other hand - maybe he does know the constitution well enough to know that any further attempts at outright gun control thru legislation will be a major problem. So he will try it thru dishonesty - by signing an international treaty.

Either way - if you think the "checks and balances" thing works I don't think you have really been paying attention.

If it worked - we wouldn't even be having this conversation right now because gun control would be a non issue.
 
So, suck it up boys and girls 'cuz you ain't seen nothin' yet. I fear that the S**tstorm is coming down hard and fast.
Mark056


You got that right: Guns are a Red Meat topic, and everyone has an opinion (though only what we believe in counts [wink]). He is going to screw the gun owners over (like Billy Boy) and all of the Democrats who vote for that BS will get tossed.

I just cannot wait for the March on Washington! [smile]
 
They seem to have dissappeared awfully quick. Conveniently... [rolleyes]
They were up in everyones face when the savior was first elected, but when the messiah turned out to be the anti-christ, they blamed someone else and went into hidding. As they always do. [thinking]

I heard a guy muttering something about it still being Bush's fault as he was curled up in the fetal position![wink]
 
I seem to remember someone on this esteemed board or another blog that such a treaty would be null and void as it violates our constitution or am I missing something?
 
Most people don't give a crap...Either:

1) They don't own guns.

2) They don't know what the Bill of Rights is.

3) They are happy in their own lives.

That's the sad, sorry, truth.

It also doesn't help our cause when the last 8 years, and the current GOP, is what most folks think of as "conservative". When it was far, far, from it.

I'll continue to do what I have been. Support the NRA or GOA etc. Taking newbies to the range, and convincing them we aren't a bunch of nut-cases [wink]

Of course, getting permission from the wife to do that with a new kid in the house is the hard part.
 
Last edited:
So basically, the next time you fly to Europe (or any other region) on vacation, customs is going to pull you aside and give you "special treatment" since you are on the international list of gun owners who may be smuggling something into their country.

In addition, since this treaty opens up the possibility of extradition for violating international law, you could be sitting at home someday when the Jack Booted Thugs arrest you and send you to Europe or China to be tried for violating some international law at home in your cabin in New Hampshire.
 
I seem to remember someone on this esteemed board or another blog that such a treaty would be null and void as it violates our constitution or am I missing something?

How long did it take to get the DC gun ban overturned?? Something like over 30 years... Just because something may or may not violate the constitution doesn't mean getting that corrected won't take decades, if it is even possible--especially since Obama is conveniently going to appoint some new Supreme Court Justices that share his opinion on what ammendments the constitution does and does not contain.

If the president gets an unconstitutional treaty ratified by a Senate controlled by a super-majority of his own party, and it is deemed constitutional by a Supreme Court appointed by him personally, then the treaty could ban religion, due process, freedom of press and free interstate travel and nobody could do anything about it. I forgot to mention, he also is the commander and chief of the armed forces...Yes, we are all fcked.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom