I love my state.
Yup.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
I love my state.
The only children on the House floor are the Democratic representatives, and the only danger they are in is having their precious egos crushed once again.UPDATE: New House Rules were officially adopted this morning, permitting house members to carry their firearms on the floor of the house.
And, I know you're going to have a hard time believing this, but the members of the opposition who spoke against this rule change invoked the safety of "THE CHILDREN "(TM).
Former state Rep. Valerie Hardy, you useless twit. http://www.wmur.com/politics/26369716/detail.html
That's NH State Representative Jenn Coffey. She's been one of the most pro-gun rights voices in the state. She was one of the folks responsible for getting the State House gun ban killed today. She also led the fight to legalize switchblades and other previously banned bladed implements.
And, tomorrow we vote on the new House Rules, at which time we'll make it lawful once again for lawmakers to carry firearms on the floor of the House.
It's amazing what PART TIME law makers can do. Too bad in THIS state we have full time HACKS.
I wish there was a binding referendum vote to make the law makers position on the hill PART TIME!
While I applaud you for removing the ban, it was never actually illegal to carry a gun in the statehouse. It was against policy. There was no RSA that stated that guns were illegal in the statehouse.
The House of Representatives spent the first business day in 2011 ending a 40-year ban on carrying concealed weapons inside the chamber and giving a new committee chairman unprecedented powers.
The Republican-dominated House voted to amend their rules to let legislators and those in the public gallery possess but not openly display firearms.
Since 1971, weapons had been banned in Representatives Hall and its adjacent rooms for anyone but law enforcement officers.
>snip<
On Tuesday, a House-Senate buildings committee restored the public’s right to carry and display weapons in the other parts of the Statehouse complex and adjacent buildings.
Two years ago, the same committee controlled by Democrats banned weapon possession throughout the complex months after a group of angry, gun-holding protesters shouted from the gallery after the House killed a resolution promoting states’ rights.
Currently, seven other states let the public carry concealed weapons into their capital buildings without a special permit, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
Two years ago, the same committee controlled by Democrats banned weapon possession throughout the complex months after a group of angry, gun-holding protesters shouted from the gallery after the House killed a resolution promoting states’ rights.
Their rationale for this firearms ban goes back to March of 2009, when the House of Representatives voted down a non-binding resolution (HCR-6) that sought to put our runaway federal government on notice for future violations of New Hampshire’s state sovereignty.
It was standing room only in the visitors’ gallery that day, with a handful of people openly exercising their First and Second Amendment rights – assembling peaceably while lawfully bearing arms. After the vote was taken, some in the gallery became disruptive, frustrated over what they perceived as the legislators’ blatant disregard for the will of the people and the constitutionally protected rights thereof.
Some shouted down to the legislators in the hall below, telling them in no uncertain terms that they would “See [them] in November!”, while others called them out for failing to represent them. There were no threats of violence made at any time. No weapons were drawn. No one’s life was endangered in any way, shape, or form. In fact, from what I observed, those individuals who were openly wearing their holstered handguns were the ones keeping their emotions in check and calling for a more calm and measured response.
The individuals responsible for the disruption were politely asked by State House security personnel to leave the gallery, a request to which they acquiesced without incident.
What the members of the Joint Committee on Legislative Facilities failed to recognize - the lesson that escaped them that day - was that the incident in question proved just the opposite of what they took away from it. It demonstrated quite clearly that you could take a number of armed citizens and put them in a politically and emotionally charged atmosphere without having it result in the fantasy-based scenarios of chaos, mayhem, and bloodshed that seem to be continuously playing out in the minds of those who would seek to disarm them.
This is what it looks like when you take the "free" out of "gun-free zone" and put it back in "Live free or die!" where it belongs.
I love that it wasn't cut on a neat, straight line, so you can really tell there used to be more to that sticker.