From the latest article...
-
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
-
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
New Boston, NH Police Chief abuses power Update Post #704
- Thread starter Shooters-Hooksett
- Start date
Any updates??
KBCraig
NES Member
http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?articleId=116ee832-631b-4ff3-9811-00a22fc06c3e
Judge steps back from gun fight
By GREG KWASNIK
Union Leader Correspondent
Friday, Apr. 9, 2010
GOFFSTOWN – A Goffstown District Court judge said yesterday that he will likely stay out of a gun custody battle between a Manchester firing range owner and New Boston Police Chief Christopher L. Krajenka.
The disagreement began Jan.27, when the judge -- Paul H. Lawrence -- issued a temporary domestic violence restraining order against Michael Murphy, 37, of New Boston. The order -- requested by Murphy's estranged wife, Paula Murphy -- stipulated that Murphy stay away from his wife, temporarily surrender custody of their two children, and turn over all guns and ammunition in his possession to police.
In executing the order, Krajenka seized nine guns that Murphy had placed on consignment at Manchester Firing Line Range, owned by James McLoud.
McLoud has since tried to retrieve the guns, filing a motion against Krajenka in Hillsborough Superior Court seeking the guns and filing a petition to intervene in Murphy's domestic violence order.
Yesterday, Judge Lawrence extended Murphy's domestic violence order, but did not rule on McLoud's petition to get the guns.
Lawrence said McLoud's parallel case in Hillsborough County Superior Court meant it was doubtful that he would make a ruling on his request."It's very unlikely that I would step into the middle of that," Lawrence said to Murphy's lawyer, Jason Major. "I don't want you to spend a lot of time and legal fees to pursue something that's probably not worth pursuing if there are legal proceedings going on over there."
(more at link)
Judge steps back from gun fight
By GREG KWASNIK
Union Leader Correspondent
Friday, Apr. 9, 2010
GOFFSTOWN – A Goffstown District Court judge said yesterday that he will likely stay out of a gun custody battle between a Manchester firing range owner and New Boston Police Chief Christopher L. Krajenka.
The disagreement began Jan.27, when the judge -- Paul H. Lawrence -- issued a temporary domestic violence restraining order against Michael Murphy, 37, of New Boston. The order -- requested by Murphy's estranged wife, Paula Murphy -- stipulated that Murphy stay away from his wife, temporarily surrender custody of their two children, and turn over all guns and ammunition in his possession to police.
In executing the order, Krajenka seized nine guns that Murphy had placed on consignment at Manchester Firing Line Range, owned by James McLoud.
McLoud has since tried to retrieve the guns, filing a motion against Krajenka in Hillsborough Superior Court seeking the guns and filing a petition to intervene in Murphy's domestic violence order.
Yesterday, Judge Lawrence extended Murphy's domestic violence order, but did not rule on McLoud's petition to get the guns.
Lawrence said McLoud's parallel case in Hillsborough County Superior Court meant it was doubtful that he would make a ruling on his request."It's very unlikely that I would step into the middle of that," Lawrence said to Murphy's lawyer, Jason Major. "I don't want you to spend a lot of time and legal fees to pursue something that's probably not worth pursuing if there are legal proceedings going on over there."
(more at link)
The aggressive ignorance in the comments is impressive...
So, he could go pick up his guns any time huh? This seems to be issue #1 with dealing anti's they have no idea what restrictions they have already imposed. They act as if guns are handed out at the lunch counter at elementary schools.
Of course that is because they don't care what current restrictions an infringements on our freedom's exist since they don't really believe in "reasonable restrictions" either. That's just lip service to get them closer to a complete ban.
We need a ban on banning - oh wait! We have one. It's called the Constitution...
Too bad, otherwise we could ban gun banners.
So, he could go pick up his guns any time huh? This seems to be issue #1 with dealing anti's they have no idea what restrictions they have already imposed. They act as if guns are handed out at the lunch counter at elementary schools.
Of course that is because they don't care what current restrictions an infringements on our freedom's exist since they don't really believe in "reasonable restrictions" either. That's just lip service to get them closer to a complete ban.
We need a ban on banning - oh wait! We have one. It's called the Constitution...
Too bad, otherwise we could ban gun banners.
Most anti-gunners are completely uneducated about guns, current regulations and anything other than their feelings on the subject. But some of those comments don't seem to be anti-gun, just people who can't figure out the mess of guns laws that are already on the books.
