If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
This
To me, scope shooting gets boring, though: put cross-hairs on target, pull trigger, target is hit.
Pat, that is true on a known distance square range. But definitely not in some of the more "practical" LR matches I've been going to lately.
Try making a first shot hit on a steel IDPA silhouette at 900 yards with a ravine in between you and the other hillside, no one to mark your shots, no wind flags, and almost no mirage.
To the OP, you want this
Check out the link in post #12.Whatcha got there Jose?
Ditto on a .223 being plenty good at 300y. Put on a fast twist barrel to stabilize the long, low-drag bullets and you are good beyond 600y.
If you are serious about being able to hit a basket ball at 600+, then Savage in .308. With their quality and that floating-head bolt they've got the best out of the box accuracy for anything close to the money. Yes, the Rem-700 is like a Chevy small block, with a zillion aftermarket items available, but there's probably a reason for that. Like, why do most serious 700 owners change the extractor? I keep hearing Remington's quality isn't what it used to be.
To me, scope shooting gets boring, though: put cross-hairs on target, pull trigger, target is hit.
If the bolt is properly timed (most are not) there is no reason to change a 700 extractor. A out of time bolt is going to have poor primary extraction, may have firing pin cocking problems and will most likely suffer accuracy problems. None of which can be fixed by changing the extractor. I have seen sako types blown down the lug race once in the past. The m16 type I have not seen fail. People add a new extractor for the same reasons they add side bolt stops and flute the bolt. The 700 extractor is fine and has been working for many years.
I don't have a 700 and probably never will unless I get a custom clone to put into a tube gun. I've heard the debate over extractors and tend to favor the keep it simple, but what about this video. I thought it was interesting and thought provoking. Once I saw it, I could recognize that for this particular cartridge and bolt, that it was a huge improvement. Don't know if it is as positive on other cartridges. If he was more aggressive with the bolt throw would it be different? Your thoughts?
B
If you want it bad enough you can find it or travel.Where in New England can one even get a shot off at those distances? I know when I was on the Army rifle team we would go to Devens to practice
I will see you video and raise you one all in good fun.
Where in New England can one even get a shot off at those distances? I know when I was on the Army rifle team we would go to Devens to practice
I have been very happy with my 700 SPS in .308. They are priced right, put rounds on target and have stood the test of time. I spent more on glass than on the rifle and probably could have gotten away with spending alot less.
Being one of the few people on this site I actually have respect for, and knowing that you actually know how to shoot, I'm hoping you were saying that tongue-in-cheek.
If only long range shooting with optics were so simple. In 30 years, I've shot almost every shooting discipline there is, CMP, IDPA, NRA National Match, Sporting Clays, name it (everything except cowboy shooting), and nothing has ever kept a smile on my face like long range shooting. There's nothing more exciting then a first round hit on a 600 or 800 yard 10" x 10" steel plate. And unfortunately, it's not as simple as putting the crosshair on it and pulling the trigger. Not even my machine guns and DD's are that fun.
I also recommend a Reminton 700, or an AR-10, or if you have deep pockets, as a previous poster said, anything from GAP Precision.
If we were talking about ranges beyond even 400yds, I would agree with you. But, the OP specified ranges of 2-300 yds. Any production hunting or varmint type rifle with glass should be able to hit a clay pidgeon at those yardages, and doing so would, to me, get rather boring.
If we are talking about a dedicated, true long-range rifle, for distances of 600yds++, hits are not automatic. You need a combination of good rifle and good shooter, and that type of shooting is fun, glass or irons.
Reading the OP again, I see he did say 2-300 yds and eventually try longer ranges. I would still suggest mastering the iron sights on the AR for all yardages up to 600yds.
I definitely plan on practicing and master with iron sights...but since I see a lot of new expenses in my near future, this is going to be a chance to get one last thing for a little while at least. I already have 5 handguns, 2 AR's, and a shotgun....I've always been interested in long range shooting (600-1000 yards) but I realize I should get better at 2-300 first. This is also why I wanted a rifle that I could learn on and then move on to the longer distances. I'm going to look into the gun Jose recommended this week...
But did you have fun?Here is a little story about my factory rifle and my shooting experience last week at Scarborough F&Gs 600 yard F-Class match. I came in dead last.
Soft seating... Tisk Tisk.LoL, no it was some guy from Vermont. I shit you not, the gun this guy has shoot two inches of vertical at 600 yards (for 20 shots). The thing was phenomenal. It was a 6mmBR.
I know John's is just as good, but he botched his last match. I think he was shooting another rifle and the thing lost a bullet in the lands and dumped a bunch of powder out into the action. He was down six after the second match.
B