Lever guns

Awesome, glad to see that you found the same thing with quality/fit. I am in the same boat eyesight-wise and already have a Skinner I will put on, they are nice sights. I also have a nice old Leupold 3X straight tube for it if needed someday.

And, are they not the most beautiful little rifles made? I am so happy that Ruger resurrected them in a nicely done, quality offering.
Skinners are the best. What I have on all 4 of mine.

Both my Ruger made 336 and 1894 in 44 are pretty much perfect. They are nicer in wood and blue and metal finish than my Remlins.

Remlins get an edge in wood figure...but finish quality.....Ruger.

From what I've seen, Ruger makes the best Marlin ever built...even better than New Haven Marlins

My .357 Remlin is too nice to let go of though. And mine has the shorter barrel 16 1/2
 
Skinners are the best. What I have on all 4 of mine.

Both my Ruger made 336 and 1894 in 44 are pretty much perfect. They are nicer in wood and blue and metal finish than my Remlins.

Remlins get an edge in wood figure...but finish quality.....Ruger.

From what I've seen, Ruger makes the best Marlin ever built...even better than New Haven Marlins

My .357 Remlin is too nice to let go of though. And mine has the shorter barrel 16 1/2

After mounting the Skinner rear sight did you find that you had to change out the factory front sight in order to accommodate the fact that the Skinner rear sight sits on a higher plane than does the original factory rear sight?

The Skinner web site has a wealth of information about peep sites that I found quite interesting. My original thought is if after installing the Skinner peep sight I find that the factory front sight is too low to use I was thinking about buying the Skinner Winged front sight as that one has elevation adjustment if I am reading their web site information correctly.
 
I really really really would love to find a nice 44 mag lever.

It appears that the Ruger/Marlin 1894 in .44 magnum has been out on the market for a while. If you run across one in your travels at a reasonable price it may be worth your consideration to consider as a possible investment.

Here is a review on the new Ruger/Marlin 1894 .44 magnum that I ran across last night that you may find of interest:



View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3JOqpOCKAs
 
I really really really would love to find a nice 44 mag lever.

I've been enjoying my Henry Carbine and Mares leg in 44mag. They shoot pretty well for the limited rounds I've put down range. Just need some more cash to be able to get a real test done.
 
After mounting the Skinner rear sight did you find that you had to change out the factory front sight in order to accommodate the fact that the Skinner rear sight sits on a higher plane than does the original factory rear sight?

The Skinner web site has a wealth of information about peep sites that I found quite interesting. My original thought is if after installing the Skinner peep sight I find that the factory front sight is too low to use I was thinking about buying the Skinner Winged front sight as that one has elevation adjustment if I am reading their web site information correctly.
I had to change mine on my 1894. If I remember the instructions for the brass sight warned that it might be too tall and needs to be filed for proper elevation. I anticipated having to do this reluctantly but fortunately the height was correct from Skinner. I believe at the time an adjustable height model wasn't available yet. I may look into that for my 336
20231216_083603.jpg 20231216_083541.jpg 20231216_083825.jpg
 
I had to change mine on my 1894. If I remember the instructions for the brass sight warned that it might be too tall and needs to be filed for proper elevation. I anticipated having to do this reluctantly but fortunately the height was correct from Skinner. I believe at the time an adjustable height model wasn't available yet. I may look into that for my 336
View attachment 828674View attachment 828676View attachment 828677

Thank you for sharing that information. This is the Skinner front sight that I was thinking may be plan B. I don't know as of yet what the mounting screw measurement is....... .700 or 1.00 center to center. The ability to adjust the front sight for elevation is what caught my eye.

1702745275158.png
 
I have a Skinner rear on my BLR. I wasn’t impressed. Rest of the rifle is perfect but the rear sight started rusting like mad. rubbed it with an oily cloth and all the blue/black finish started coming off. Anybody else had this issue?
 
Thank you for sharing that information. This is the Skinner front sight that I was thinking may be plan B. I don't know as of yet what the mounting screw measurement is....... .700 or 1.00 center to center. The ability to adjust the front sight for elevation is what caught my eye.

View attachment 828712
The winged looks nice. What model/cal and year manufacture gun do you have? I just checked out their website and they have some nice new options. I'm debating what I want to use on my '64 336
 
The winged looks nice. What model/cal and year manufacture gun do you have? I just checked out their website and they have some nice new options. I'm debating what I want to use on my '64 336

I picked up a Ruger/Marlin1894 in .357 Magnum the other day. According to the Ruger serial number look up site this rifle's serial number comes back as:

1702762083046.png

I am thinking that the shipping date would correspond to what passes for the model year when the rifle was actually manufactured.
 
I picked up a Ruger/Marlin1894 in .357 Magnum the other day. According to the Ruger serial number look up site this rifle's serial number comes back as:

View attachment 828812

I am thinking that the shipping date would correspond to what passes for the model year when the rifle was actually manufactured.
If you go the adjustable route you're good. It looks like you can use one of the "bear buster" front sights too as they only use one screw. However they suggest a .500 height for your make and model. I like the color and contrast of brass compared to black but to each their own!
 
If you go the adjustable route you're good. It looks like you can use one of the "bear buster" front sights too as they only use one screw. However they suggest a .500 height for your make and model. I like the color and contrast of brass compared to black but to each their own!

My Ruger PC Carbine has a mid-mount adjustable peep sight and a winged front sight that is not adjustable, and this combination looks ok to my eye. The Skinner site recommends installing the peep sight first and trying it with the Marlin OEM front sight at the range. They said that if the adjustable peep sight and the non-adjustable factory front sight do not work for my slowly declining eyesight that a different front sight may be required.

The winged front sight caught my attention because it can be adjusted without apparently needing to do any file work to it as the fixed front sights may require. I have a winged FastFire 3 on the PC Carbine and that does not look too odd to me so if I have to change front sights on the Marlin, I may just order the winged peep sight to match the front winged sight if I end up going that route.

I ordered the rear peep site at 11 pm this past Thursday and it was shipped out to me yesterday (Friday) with an expected delivery date of this upcoming Wednesday. I am looking forward to installing it on the 1894 and trying it out.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the Skinner sights, your time is appreciated.
 
My Ruger PC Carbine has a mid-mount adjustable peep sight and a winged front sight that is not adjustable, and this combination looks ok to my eye. The Skinner site recommends installing the peep sight first and trying it with the Marlin OEM front sight at the range. They said that if the adjustable peep sight and the non-adjustable factory front sight do not work for my slowly declining eyesight that a different front sight may be required.

The winged front sight caught my attention because it can be adjusted without apparently needing to do any file work to it as the fixed front sights may require. I have a winged FastFire 3 on the PC Carbine and that does not look too odd to me so if I have to change front sights on the Marlin, I may just order the winged peep sight to match the front winged sight if I end up going that route.

I ordered the rear peep site at 11 pm this past Thursday and it was shipped out to me yesterday (Friday) with an expected delivery date of this upcoming Wednesday. I am looking forward to installing it on the 1894 and trying it out.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the Skinner sights, your time is appreciated.
Hey this is the internet and I'm no expert! I became a lever fan when my father bought a '77 1894 .44 mag that would not feed. I "fixed" it 20 years later and respect the platform as an intersting antiquity. The Skinner sights are icing on the cake
 
Hey this is the internet and I'm no expert! I became a lever fan when my father bought a '77 1894 .44 mag that would not feed. I "fixed" it 20 years later and respect the platform as an intersting antiquity. The Skinner sights are icing on the cake

I have been informed that the prevailing opinion in some quarters is that I am considered "an interesting antiquity" myself.......... but I always respond by saying that does not bother me as I have been called worse by people who know me better.

The wood and metal construction of the 1894 genre struck me as harkening back to a time when people regarded their personal firearms as a basic tool employed in the process of meeting the demands of their daily living challenges regardless of where they lived and what those challenges entailed.

The Ruger/Marlin that I bought really seemed to stand out to me in an industry that currently appears to focus more on the manufacture of firearms whose DNA has more than just a passing acquaintance with the family of plastics in some form or another. This 129-year-old design is predicated upon wood and steel which in today's firearm world is unusual.........and some would say....... almost heretical in and of itself.

The rifle's balance feels right in my hands and when mounted to my shoulder, and I enjoy gazing upon the evident manufacturing effort and quality that went into its rebirth by the folks at Ruger. God only knows what our short-term future will entail....... but no matter what ends up being cast upon my threshold in the wee hours of the night this rifle will not be sold.......if only for the simple reason that I don't have another 20 years to regret having taken that rash course of action.


1702773265851.png 1702773345869.png
 
My Ruger PC Carbine has a mid-mount adjustable peep sight and a winged front sight that is not adjustable, and this combination looks ok to my eye. The Skinner site recommends installing the peep sight first and trying it with the Marlin OEM front sight at the range. They said that if the adjustable peep sight and the non-adjustable factory front sight do not work for my slowly declining eyesight that a different front sight may be required.

The winged front sight caught my attention because it can be adjusted without apparently needing to do any file work to it as the fixed front sights may require. I have a winged FastFire 3 on the PC Carbine and that does not look too odd to me so if I have to change front sights on the Marlin, I may just order the winged peep sight to match the front winged sight if I end up going that route.

I ordered the rear peep site at 11 pm this past Thursday and it was shipped out to me yesterday (Friday) with an expected delivery date of this upcoming Wednesday. I am looking forward to installing it on the 1894 and trying it out.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the Skinner sights, your time is appreciated.
Using the Skinner Express sight - All my Marlins used the stock front sight, both 1894 in .357 and 44mag, the 336 in 30/30, and 1895 in 45-70. All are pretty much set to the lowest setting.

My winchester 94 in 30/30 had to put the skinner front blade in to get the rifle to zero. Especially using Lever Rev type reloads.
 
Using the Skinner Express sight - All my Marlins used the stock front sight, both 1894 in .357 and 44mag, the 336 in 30/30, and 1895 in 45-70. All are pretty much set to the lowest setting.

My winchester 94 in 30/30 had to put the skinner front blade in to get the rifle to zero. Especially using Lever Rev type reloads.

Thank you for sharing your experience with the Skinner on your 1894s. I am supposed to receive the Skinner sight that I ordered last Thursday night on this upcoming Wednesday in the mail.
I am looking forward to mounting it on my 1894 and seeing how well it works for my eyes with the OEM factory front sight.
 
It has been a long time since I owned and enjoyed shooting my Marlin 1894 Cowboy in .357 Magnum. The recent purchase of the new Ruger/Marlin 1894 .357 magnum rifle reminded me that I needed to refresh my memory about the finer points of this rifle's care and feeding.

I imagine that this initial research is information that most board members already know from their own current experiences with this rifle, but I thought that it may be of interest to potential new owners of the 1894.

The 1894 is essentially a 129-year-old design that is manufactured in 2023. This rebirth is a faithful copy of the original in as much as the screws have actual slotted heads on them as opposed to the allen head fasteners that seem to be the current standard on rifles today.

Ruger supplies a very well written owner's manual with the rifle that makes a point of reminding one that after cleaning it the 4 receiver screws should be checked for tightness. This instruction reminded me that one needs to be aware of the fact that the Marlin employs different size slotted head screws to put it together just as the original design did. These screw heads are susceptible to being damaged if one does not use a screwdriver that actually fits the individual screw's slot size.

I had an old Chapman MFG. gunsmithing set of bits I used to try and determine if I had bits that would work on the 1894. The following screwdriver size bit numbers are based on that set because that is all that I had on hand. There are other brands that are available, but I have no experience with them.

I ordered a new complete gunsmith set....number 8900..... from Chapman which I found on sale for $47 at their site. If you only need these types of bits for this particular rifle you can order the 6 different size bits needed for $12.75 from Chapman.

The following images are from the Ruger owner's manual which I made notes on for my benefit and the PDF guide is from an older .357 Magnum 1894 disassembly protocol I found while wondering around the internet that I think may still be relevant to the new Ruger manufactured 1894. I was not able to post the link to the PDF file of this guide due to my limited computer literacy, so I took a screen shot of the article's title page which any interested readers can search for on the net.

The bit sizes are from the Chapman screwdrivers I have so I don't know if these same sizes correspond to the bit sizes of other brands of screwdrivers.

1702933069287.png

1702933461812.png

1702933645628.png
 
I've seen a few sideways Remlins WRT fit and finish, particularly in the front handguard and the sights (canted) but I have a special edition (Curly Maple) run of one of the last runs of Remlin's and it's remarkably well made. In fact, when I first got it and looked at that wood and the bluing, I knew it was going to be a safe queen and I would have to buy another, so I did.

Reminds of when Van Halen hired little people as body guards and then had to hire body guards for the their body guards. But I digress.
 
Hey this is the internet and I'm no expert! I became a lever fan when my father bought a '77 1894 .44 mag that would not feed. I "fixed" it 20 years later and respect the platform as an intersting antiquity. The Skinner sights are icing on the cake

I ordered the Skinner peep sight late last Thursday night. It was shipped Friday morning and I received it yesterday (Monday) here in the Back of Beyond. I thought that was rather quick shipping from Idaho to the People's Democratic Socialist Republic of Massachusetts.

I noticed today that the Ruger/Marlin 1895 Trapper model uses Skinner front and rear sights as their OEM factory sights which I found interesting.
 
I thought that it might be prudent to have a few small parts on hand for unexpected moments of misadventure with my 1894, so I went to the Ruger/ Marlin parts site:


I was interested in a spare lever screw, tang screw and ejector assembly as these parts would be removed on a regular basis as part of the rifle's maintenance program. This is what I found:

1703020010957.png
Detailed Description

MLC04500-NI Finger lever screw, Nickel-plated. This part is backward compatible with pre-Ruger manufactured model 1895's.

A random sampling of other small parts showed that they were only available plated and that they were all "backward compatible with pre-Ruger manufactured model 1895's'. Since I wanted parts that were blued and compatible with a 2023 Ruger/Marlin manufactured 1894 this description was not necessarily too encouraging to me.

I sent an email to the Ruger/Marlin customer service inquiring about parts available for current Ruger manufactured 1894s. Ruger appears to have a separate customer support site for Marlin product inquires:

Contact Ruger/Marlin Customer Service by phone, mail or submit your question via our online web form.

271 Cardwell Road, Mayodan, NC 27027
Phone: 336-949-5200 / Fax: 336-949-5300
Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm ET

ONLINE SUPPORT REQUEST

Several hours later I received the following answer:

1703021085907.png

I was impressed with the quick return email, but I already knew that the manual did not list the current factory part numbers which is why I emailed in the first place. The thought occurred to me that perhaps speaking with a real person at the factory would provide the information that I sought so I called them.

I explained what information I was looking for and the individual who answered the call transferred me to a woman in what I guess was the production part of the factory. I explained what parts I wanted to buy and she asked me to hold for a moment while she spoke to someone and quickly returned.

She explained that the production line was still in the process of scaling up the Marlin products manufacturing side of the business and they were not fully finished yet. In order to cross reference my parts request she asked for both the part name and key number from the manual's parts list and the item number from their parts web site. She then confirmed that the parts item numbers I gave her were the correct ones for my new 1894 and would have full functionality but they would not be blued because they do not have blued 1894 parts available for sale quite yet. Since these parts are for emergency use only, I was more interested in their functionality as opposed to their cosmetic appearance.

Overall, I really enjoyed speaking with her and found that she made an effort to find the information that I was looking for which I appreciated. I ordered the 3 parts and hopefully will receive them near the end of the week.

Having been thru the implementation and execution of 3 different generations of manufacturing processes in a high-tech environment myself, I think that Ruger has done an excellent job in the rollout of their Marlin product line.

If you need parts for an emergency usage and can live with their being plated here is the cross-referenced information that you will be asked for when you call to order them.

I have confirmed the accuracy of the top 3 parts myself .......... but I have not personally confirmed the accuracy of the remaining parts information so be sure to talk to someone at the N.C. factory to ensure that you get the actual parts that you want.



1703023120070.png
1703023169618.png
1703023220678.png
1703023256458.png
 
I'LL BE MOVING BACK TO MA. SOON AFTER 30 YRS IN FLORIDA. I'M TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHATS LEGAL. IT LOOKS LIKE YOU GUYS ARE RICH WITH THE MARLINS AND WINCHESTERS. I'V HAD AND DO HAVE SOME ROSSI 92'S IN .357 MAG, 16 INCH BBLS. DO YOU ALL HATE THEM ? OR ARE THAT NOT AVAIABLE IN MA. ?
 
Back
Top Bottom