really.....because every time someone goes on a shooting spree with a legally purchased gun(Tuscon(?) &VT).....you people are all irate over how they let a known "crazy" person buy a gun.
Who the hell are "you people?" I don't recall saying a word about either incident here. I may have expressed some opinions in private, but you weren't there, I'm sure. Go ahead - start a survey. See how many people think that the incidents at either venue would have been prevented by stricter gun laws. You're preaching to the wrong demographic here.
obviously the meth head is not going to follow the laws......that hypothetical situation was a jab at your response portraying all blind people like saints........
It failed. I don't think of all blind people as saints, nor did I insinuate such. IMO, saints, sinners, and everyone in between should have their natural rights protected by their elected government until they actually become a criminal. Until then, hands off. Again, pre-meditated crime detection is science fiction.
AND ENOUGH WITH THE "OUT YOURSELF" BULL SHIT........WE GET IT, EVERYONE WHO HAS A DIFFERING OPINION MUST BE AN ANTI-GUN COMMUNIST FREEDOM HATER..........GET OVER YOURSELF ALREADY
When it comes to Liberty, things are pretty well black and white. We're not arguing over Jimi Hendrix vs. Steve Vai here, we're talking about basic human rights. "The middle" is what got us into the mess we're in here in the first place. No one's mad at you (well, maybe Derek, since you called out his Mom, and maybe blindfire, but he's kind of lame anyway, whether or not he's well-sighted
) here - we're trying to make you see that your opinions are in direct conflict with Freedom. We want you to embrace Freedom and Liberty, because the more of us there are, the fewer of "them" we have to fight with to keep our Liberty secure.