If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Just saw a Michelle Malkin interview, apparently all his bad acts and lies to police were banned from trial. Hard to win a case when both your hands are tied.
Mayor and Governor should have been codefendants
And agree with individualist
If Kate's dad starts shooting everyone who allowed this to happen in addition to the shooter - I'd have to vote not guilty. If Kate was my daughter - it would have started overnight.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/t...hooting/ar-BBFZ7wR?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp
I'm glad they are deporting him, of course he is under San Francisco rules still - will they just cut him loose anyway under the Sanctuary City crap? If he does get sent back to Mexico, won't he just come back in - he's done it 5 times already.
Need a law that says3rd2nd time illegal - life in prison.
I saw that also, on what basis is it not relevant to know about this guys rap sheet??
If a Licensed Gun Owner did this he would be in jail for life. This was a statement by an anti-trump constituency that said eff your illegal immigration laws and anti-sanctuary city views.
"A California jury acquitted Zarate of the more serious charges in the case, including murder, involuntary manslaughter and assault with a deadly weapon -- only convicting him of being a felon in possession of a firearm."
I thought if someone was killed in the commission of a crime it is murder....well, he was committing a crime and someone died. So WTF????
I saw that also, on what basis is it not relevant to know about this guys rap sheet??
I wouldn't be surprised if they gave his gun back pending further charges!
.
But the crime he was committed of, is canceled out by being a criminal and thus, we use English language rules to decide that a double negative is a positive, and that is the only thing the English language is good for, since it is the language of the oppressors and colonial exploitation.
Duh.
The gun was never 'his' - the shooter's claim was that he found it in a public place, and never claimed that he bought it anywhere. There was no evidence brought to trial that ever linked the gun to the shooter, so this part of his story held-up.
.......
- had this shooter been a tourist here on vacation, the results probably would have been the same.
The shooter claimed the discharge was an accident.
This is the story of what happens when clueless morons stumble-upon loaded firearms, and don't have the common sense to leave them alone.
The shooter actually claimed he didn’t even know it was a gun when he picked it up and that it just went off when he picked it up. Shitty work by the prosecutor to not put more holes in that story.
The way many stories still call him an “undocumented immigrant” really grinds my gears. He’s been deported five times!!! He’s not undocumented, he’s illegal!
He had multiple stories - he said he pulled the trigger, then he said he stepped on it, then he threw it in the ocean to keep it from firing
A San Francisco jury reached a verdict Thursday afternoon in the trial of a homeless undocumented immigrant in the fatal shooting of Kate Steinle as she strolled with her father on Pier 14 to take in a view of San Francisco Bay.
The jury was expected to issue the verdict at about 4 p.m. after several days of deliberations.
http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Jury-reaches-verdict-in-killing-of-Kate-Steinle-12396509.php
--------
My guess... Guilty of involuntary manslaughter.
He was 90-95 feet away when he pulled the trigger 3 times.
He did not mean to kill her.
Bullet ricocheted and hit her in the back.
The killer does not deserve to live but I don't think he will be convicted of murder.
Stay tuned...
At least the ranger whose gun was stolen made out ok
https://ww2.kqed.org/news/2017/10/2...s-gun-was-stolen-and-used-in-steinle-killing/
The gun was stolen from a federal agent 4 days earlier (BLM).
I would disagree with your second statement, I can almost guarantee if it was some tourist they would at least get involuntary manslaughter.
Anyone care to venture a guess this guys fate in the NY courts ?
A New York man has been charged with second-degree manslaughter after he shot and killed a woman he says he mistook for a deer.
Thomas Jadlowski, 34, pleaded not guilty to the manslaughter charge and hunting after hours on Thursday. His bail was set at $50,000 cash or $100,000 property. The charges carry a maximum prison sentence of 15 years.
Rosemary Billquist, 43, was walking her dogs in a field in the town of Sherman on Nov. 22 when she was shot by Jadlowski, who was about 200 yards away, according to the Chautauqua County Sheriff's Office.