Introducing the 5 Worst Handguns Ever

commodon

NES Member
Joined
May 27, 2017
Messages
1,966
Likes
2,725
Location
Massachusetts
Feedback: 4 / 0 / 0
What would you select?

Colt1991A1ORM-01.JPG


Handheld firearms have existed in one form or another since the 13th century. Despite their long history, there have been relatively few real, genuine clunkers in the world of handguns. The close engagement range of handguns—typically zero to twenty-five feet—means that a handgun operator will often have little or no chance to clear a jammed weapon, and therefore complete, absolute, unqualified reliability is a must. Nevertheless, some handgun clunkers became famous, popular, or both.

Nambu:

The Nambu is one of the worst pistols ever designed. At first glance, Japan’s first semi-automatic pistol design resembles the iconic German Luger P-08—though the comparison stops there. Designed by Kijiro Nambu at manufactured at Tokyo’s Koishikawa Arsenal, the Nambu was meant to provide Japan’s armed forces with an indigenously designed and produced handgun. Quality was generally good, but the design was horrendous. The double recoil springs and magazine spring made extracting the magazine extremely difficult. A weak striker spring gradually lost power, resulting in light primer strikes and misfires. The gun’s ergonomics were very poor and veered more towards traditional Japanese martial weapons than a comfortable, pointable, handgun. Although popular in the Imperial Japanese Army and Navy, only the latter officially adopted it, with Army officers often purchasing theirs out of pocket.

Beretta Model 1923:

Beretta built many successful handguns for the Italian armed forces in World War I, particularly the Beretta Model 1915. An attempt to modernize the 1915, however, introduced a key design flaw. The Model 1923 featured an external ring hammer and crucially, was chambered in 9x19 Glisenti. Meanwhile, the 9x19 Parabellum round was fast becoming the dominant pistol round among European armies. 9x19 Glisenti was considerably less powerful than its more widely accepted twin, and the latter could be inserted into a Model 1923...with possibly disastrous consequences. It was likely for this reason the Model 1923 was discontinued after two years, with subsequent Beretta pistols chambered in 7.65 Browning, and eventually 9x19 Parabellum.

Type 68 Handgun:

The Type 68 was a North Korean handgun based on the Soviet World War II era Tokarev TT-33 handgun design. The Tokarev is very roughly the USSR’s answer to John Moses Browning’s 1911 handgun, utilizing a similar design and designed for mass production. The Type 68is not a strict copy of the TT-33, being unaccountably shorter and bulkier than any other Tokarev variant—of which there are many. This has the unfortunate downside of driving up recoil and thus driving down accuracy. Perhaps indicative of the regime’s paranoia, the Type 68 cannot share magazines with real TT-33s.

Colt 2000:

In the early 1980s, the nine-millimeter Glock 17 handgun ushered in the age of “Wonder Nines.” These were reliable, often foreign-made nine-millimeter handguns with large high capacity magazines. This change in buying habits caught legendary American arms maker Colt by surprise, and the company was slow to offer its own Wonder Nine. In 1991 the company finally unveiled the Colt 2000 . Despite an excellent pedigree—the Colt 2000 was designed by firearm legends Reed Knight Jr. and Eugene Stoner (inventor of the AR-15)—the handgun was a complete failure. Owners experienced failure to extract issues involving spent shell casings, poor accuracy, and a safety recall. It was also very unattractive. Sales lagged and the Colt 2000, introduced in 1991 was just canceled three years later in 1994.

Deer Gun:

The CIA originally conceived a single shot, disposable pistol—the Deer Gun—as a way to cheaply arm South Vietnamese intelligence agents operating in hostile territory. It was essentially a single shot weapon designed to allow an agent to kill a sentry and take his weapon. The Deer Gun was an aluminum pistol grip fitted with a barrel and a removable plastic safety that once removed doubled as a front sight. The gun was meant to be distributed unmarked in a plastic box with three rounds of unmarked 9x19 Parabellum ammunition. The extremely slow rate of fire made it for all intents and purposes a single shot weapon, and the 9x19 round could not guarantee to incapacitate the target. As the war grew more violent and involved more heavily armed personnel on both sides, the Deer Gun grew less practical, and only 1,000 were built.

From Introducing the 5 Worst Handguns Ever
 
I love that you posted the 1911 at the top to trigger would be readers before they even started haha
That being said I don't quite agree with all nambus being listed because for their time a lot of his designs were ahead of contemporaries. But there wasn't much of a developmental cycle for improvements for those handguns are some of the others that were adopted.
 
Don't you f***ing say "hipoint" don't you f***ing say that about an affordable kind of self defense weapon.

shitpoint is pretty bad too only saved by virtue of the fact that there are a lot of other guns that are worse, lmao.
 
Unfortunately bought one in 94...Gets my vote.

Colt's quality control started to go downhill around the time of the series 80s guns... And maybe earlier in some opinions. But the 1991 series guns definitely were pretty crude and had random quality issues. One thing I stay away from, regardless of make, year, etc... is any 1911 with a sub-commander-length slide. The officer models, Defenders, Compacts and so forth just seem to be more prone to jamming issues than 4.25" and up barrel lengths. The M1991 officer model at the top of this page, I would stay the F away from. ;)
 
Colt's quality control started to go downhill around the time of the series 80s guns... And maybe earlier in some opinions. But the 1991 series guns definitely were pretty crude and had random quality issues. One thing I stay away from, regardless of make, year, etc... is any 1911 with a sub-commander-length slide. The officer models, Defenders, Compacts and so forth just seem to be more prone to jamming issues than 4.25" and up barrel lengths. The M1991 officer model at the top of this page, I would stay the F away from. ;)

YES! Mine is in much better shape as I pretty much have had it locked away...F'ed with it myself, had couple gun smiths look at it (one guy highly recommended had it twice no dice). Buy cheap buy twice is the motto here.
 
Hmmm. My 1991 Stainless 5" .45 has been 100% reliable with everything I've run through it, including reloads good and bad. When it was new I sent it to Chestnut Mountain Sports in VT for a a little work and it came back with a 4-lb. trigger and a polished feed ramp without replacing any parts. Most new 1911-pattern production guns will benefit from a little tuning.
 
Lorcin, Jennings, Davis, Sedco, Intratec ..... do I need to continue down this road?

Hey, don't go knocking Jennings! I had one in the 80s that was flawless. I just bought a near new one the other day, with 2 mags in the box, for $100. I can't wait to take it precision target shooting! It fits in my pocket with room left over for my 9mm Shield, mags, and groceries!
 
I’m blanking on the name of the manufacturer, but a buddy had a post WWII Russian made pistol that jammed every other shot. It effing sucked.
 
I'm still trying to figure out what a Beretta 1923 has to do with Quilted Northern..... holy clickbait.... [rofl]

View attachment 259766

Relational advertising. If your edc is a jam-o-matic, you'll need a lot.

Who hasn't seen products suggested as soon as you put something in your shopping cart? Usually under a heading like "People who purchased this also bought..."

And speaking of jam-o-matics, is it too late to nominate the Parker pistol from the now defunct Wyoming Arms, if only for an Honorable Mention?
 
Relational advertising. If your edc is a jam-o-matic, you'll need a lot.

Who hasn't seen products suggested as soon as you put something in your shopping cart? Usually under a heading like "People who purchased this also bought..."

And speaking of jam-o-matics, is it too late to nominate the Parker pistol from the now defunct Wyoming Arms, if only for an Honorable Mention?
Oh I get it. You need all that quilted northern for all the shit your gonna be taking?
 
And speaking of jam-o-matics, is it too late to nominate the Parker pistol from the now defunct Wyoming Arms, if only for an Honorable Mention?

Oh, yeah. I had forgotten about those. Had one when they first came out, since I couldn't afford a Colt Delta Elite. Yep, jam-o-matic!
 
One thing I stay away from, regardless of make, year, etc... is any 1911 with a sub-commander-length slide. The officer models, Defenders, Compacts and so forth just seem to be more prone to jamming issues than 4.25" and up barrel lengths.
yeah, they do have that reputation. those first officer models were horrible back in the day, i haven't handled one since. but, i've owned a compact .45 for a while, 26 years maybe. i can hear the groans when i say it's a para ordnance p-12. bought it on a whim at a denver gunshow. i keep it to a diet of 230 gr ball....i'd trust my life on it. steel frame, heavy as hell when fully loaded. too heavy to really carry without suspenders on. i rarely keep a gun i struggle to run and this one works extremely well. downside, the smaller .45's tend to beat themselves up, usually because they had the same weight recoil spring, in relation to size, as a full size. it just battered the small, lighter slide & frame. mine is peened around the slide stop cut out. it bit my hand in recol, bec installed a beavertail on it a few years ago. it's a range toy now and fun to shoot.
 
There are no sh1tty handguns, only sh1tty gun owners who cant shoot or take care of their equipment....
:)

I was just about to post that I buy all these guns have stellar reputations for accuracy, but none of them seem to be able to shoot worth a damn once I get them home.:(
 
Back
Top Bottom