one-eyed Jack
Manufacturer
Right you are. If at any time Little Jack were to let go of the gun and put his hands in his pockets, the position of the gun would not change. The instructor always needs to be in complete control. Jack.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
I'm a very capable shooter and I wouldn't handle a full auto Uzi with more than a couple rounds in it to start until I'm comfortable shooting it
Do we really have to tell people not to let a 9 year old shoot an Uzi?
Poor kid.
Given the nature of the facility relying on drive-by tourists (no pun intended) to stop spur of the moment, I have to wonder if the investigation won't uncover "instructors" claiming to be pressured by management to turn away as few people as possible. They seem to be in the business of selling fun and "the experience" to people who may have never held a weapon before. Turning too many away for being potentially unsafe, while prudent, may not be acceptable to the bottom line.
The storm has begun on the typical media stations.
Only because it will get watched...The storm has begun on the typical media stations.
Perhaps if everyone stopped linking, gawking and drooling it wouldn't be the top story?
Dude, your anger is seriously misplaced. She trusted adults who failed her, she gets ZERO blame in this instance.I think they should prosecute the child and the parents.......the surviving family should sue them.......
if that kid shot up a school they'd prosecute , regardless of intent, lesser charges still apply..
If i where somehow involved i know i would be both prosecuted and sued;Yet, i wasn't there or involved in any way but i am still suppose to give up my rights "For the children"
Ohh poor her.. to suggest a child doesn't know the consequences of their action is a joke. i don't get what's to feel sorry about. she killed someone and there will be no consequences just a bunch of sympathy and theropy...Ya that's a great lessened learned. we should extend those same consequences to everyone up to 26 years of age like health insurance.
Think i am being a dick? i'm dead serious. It's un american if no one gets sued and the waiver probably covered the business not the customers.
Yeah, this week isn't one for arguing against the next flood... It's been a rough month to justify humanity. LOLBut...America!
I'm going to go live in a cave.
Dude, your anger is seriously misplaced. She trusted adults who failed her, she gets ZERO blame in this instance.
I do agree that there is a risk they end up convincing her to be messed up when she may not otherwise. That's what I mean by "getting the help she needs", not garbage programmed guilt.
I don't care about the lawsuits - they are all nonsense then won't bring anyone back or teach anyone anything they don't already know.I can point a lot of fingers here...like why was he standing where he was if he wasn't going to put a hand on the gun, why he wasn't behind her with 4 hands on the gun like other have said..
I am just saying "Legaly" which case do you think is better after removing the fact she was 7
I don't care about the lawsuits - they are all nonsense then won't bring anyone back or teach anyone anything they don't already know.
Instructor just got tenure at the pine box university for his part.
Finger pointing is what the conservatives will be doing to promote their agenda. If we do the same, we look as bad as the conservative. IMO, it's a tragic incident. /thread
Sent from my Tinfoil hat
I wish I could sue you for that post.I think they should prosecute the child and the parents.......the surviving family should sue them.......
if that kid shot up a school they'd prosecute , regardless of intent, lesser charges still apply..
If i where somehow involved i know i would be both prosecuted and sued;Yet, i wasn't there or involved in any way but i am still suppose to give up my rights "For the children"
Ohh poor her.. to suggest a child doesn't know the consequences of their action is a joke. i don't get what's to feel sorry about. she killed someone and there will be no consequences just a bunch of sympathy and theropy...Ya that's a great lessened learned. we should extend those same consequences to everyone up to 26 years of age like health insurance.
Think i am being a dick? i'm dead serious. It's un american if no one gets sued and the waiver probably covered the business not the customers.
I can point a lot of fingers here...like why was he standing where he was if he wasn't going to put a hand on the gun, why he wasn't behind her with 4 hands on the gun like other have said..
I am just saying "Legaly" which case do you think is better after removing the fact she was 7
Legally speaking the range and the instructor own all of this. Period, end, full stop. Even if she was an adult that's how it would pan out, too.
-Mike