• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

How old is too old? Certainly way past 75

Joined
Feb 20, 2006
Messages
2,856
Likes
337
Location
Myrtle Beach,S.c
Feedback: 108 / 0 / 0
The Press Journal 10/07/2014, Page A05


How old is too old? Certainly way past 75


Key health care adviser to president offers controversial admission in The Atlantic

In a controversial article in the October issue of The Atlantic, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel writes,Seventy-five. Thats how long I want to live: 75 years. The controversy is not strictly because of the sentiment he expresses; many people feel the same way he does about growing old. Even Psalm 90 describes a similar lifespan:The days of our years are threescore years and ten (70); and if by reason of strength they be fourscore years (80), yet is their strength labor and sorrow; for it is soon cut off, and we fly away. Nor does Emanuel draw cheap attention to himself by advocating for legalizing euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. He has always been against those movements and in favor of improving endof-life care.

But his remarks are provocative because he is one of the most influential doctors in America a key health adviser to President Barack Obama, and brother of Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel. When he advocates life past 75 is not worth living, at some point there may be public-policy implications.

Ezekiel Emanuel writes:The fact is that by 75, creativity, originality, and productivity are pretty much gone for the vast, vast majority of us. It is true, people can continue to be productive past 75to write and publish, to draw, carve, and sculpt, to compose. But there is no getting around the data. By definition, few of us can be exceptions. Before consigning everyone over 75 to the fate of Soylent Green (if you're under 50, Google that reference), Emanuel should be reminded what his world might look like were it not for those exceptional people over 75.

When he was over 75, President Ronald Reagan gave his famous speech challenging Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev to tear down the Berlin Wall. No speech was more crucial to ending 20th century European communism.

While Emanuel, a Democrat, may hold no special fondness for Reagan, he need only look at Edward Kennedy, the longtime Democratic senator from Massachusetts. In 2008, when Kennedy was over 75, he compared Obama to his brother, President John F. Kennedy. The senator then made the momentous decision to endorse Obama for the Democratic nomination for president at the expense of Hillary Clinton. Without the Kennedy endorsement, Obama might not have won.

In his 80s, British leader Winston Churchill completed one of the 20th century's greatest historical works,A History of the English-Speaking Peoples. Astronaut John Glenn, the first American to orbit the Earth, became the oldest person to fly in space at age 77. In a remarkable and underreported life, adventurer Barbara Hillary, having survived cancer, became the first African-American woman to reach the North Pole at 75. Four years later, she made it to the South Pole, becoming the first African-American woman to visit both poles.

In The Atlantic, Emanuel despaired of the declining contributions of elderly scientists. Yet when he was 88, Dr. Michael DeBakey, Americas greatest heart surgeon, supervised Russian cardiac surgeons who performed bypass surgery on Russian President Boris Yeltsin. DeBakey practiced medicine, lectured and wrote well into his 90s. His medical career alone spanned Emanuels natural lifespan of 75 years. Barbara McClintock won the Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine when she was in her 80s for her groundbreaking work in genetics.

If any group has the right to take issue with Emanuel, it is attorneys. When he was 78, Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. issued an opinion, familiar to every law student, that outlined the limits of free speech: He wrote that the First Amendment would not protect a man falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic.His colleague, Louis Brandeis, served on the court for 23 years, well into his 80s. Four of the nine current Supreme Court justices are over 75.

Great authors including George Bernard Shaw and Johann Wolfgang von Goethe did some of their best writing after they were 75, and two of the immortal artists of the Renaissance, Michelangelo and Titian, worked prolifically until they were nearly 90.

But put aside all the accomplishments of the extraordinary elderly. Emanuel has overstepped his bounds for reasons other than those exceptions. Simply consider ordinary people over 75all the love and affection they give to others, as well as all the love and affection others give to them. Imagine how much poorer our country would be without that love.

Emanuels ostensibly common-sense advice that people should not live past 75 brings to mind what the philosopher Bertrand Russell once wrote,This is one of those views which are so absurd that only very learned men could possibly adopt them.Russell happened to be 87 when he wrote that.

Dr. Cory Franklin, a Wilmette, Illinois, physician, wrote this for the Chicago Tribune.

CORY FRaNKlIN

GuEst Columnist

Fred
 
I think that Dr. Franklin missed the point of the article. Sure, some people are going to be productive well into their senescence. Will most people? No. Just like most people won't be rich and beautiful. All the original article was saying is that having longevity as a goal may not be very healthy. Are you better off living a full and happy life and dying at 75, or better off spending your life until 75 working hard to get a few more years in? Most of my recent ancestors lived to be in their 90s and died with (more or less) clear minds and decent health, so I wouldn't mind living to be a healthy 90. I completely understand Dr. Emanuel's point though, and that is that more and more Americans are living their last few years in a haze of drugs and uncomfortable medical procedures. My grandmother died after having a quintuple bypass heart surgery, and while it was immensely hard to lose her, but I wonder if she was happier that way anyway.
 
I think that Dr. Franklin missed the point of the article. Sure, some people are going to be productive well into their senescence. Will most people? No. Just like most people won't be rich and beautiful. All the original article was saying is that having longevity as a goal may not be very healthy. Are you better off living a full and happy life and dying at 75, or better off spending your life until 75 working hard to get a few more years in? Most of my recent ancestors lived to be in their 90s and died with (more or less) clear minds and decent health, so I wouldn't mind living to be a healthy 90. I completely understand Dr. Emanuel's point though, and that is that more and more Americans are living their last few years in a haze of drugs and uncomfortable medical procedures. My grandmother died after having a quintuple bypass heart surgery, and while it was immensely hard to lose her, but I wonder if she was happier that way anyway.

I am 27. The math says that 75 would mean I would have, in effect, never known my grandmother who is currently 96 (and while more frail still in good health, might only have one prescription).
 
I've never personally believed that longevity just for the sake of longevity was worthwhile. Sure, if I can still be sharp and independent past 75, then bring it on, but if I become a burden to those around me, either financially, or health-wise, then I have no desire to stick around. Unfortunately, these choices are often decided by others who selfishly keep their elders around for the wrong reasons. As Def Leppard once proclaimed, "It's better to burn out, than fade away!"
 
I would like to retire some day. I do a pretty good job of saving my money, but simple math says that will not happen until I am about 73. If that is the case nobody is handing me a little blue pill when I am 75.
 
I would like to retire some day. I do a pretty good job of saving my money, but simple math says that will not happen until I am about 73. If that is the case nobody is handing me a little blue pill when I am 75.

Did you read the original article? Nobody is talking about eugenics.
 
Back
Top Bottom