Heller gets his gun

Joined
May 8, 2005
Messages
4,728
Likes
348
Location
In the Great Smoky Mountains
Feedback: 31 / 0 / 0
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The man whose lawsuit overturned Washington's handgun ban has successfully registered his revolver, ending a more than 30-year wait to keep the weapon in his home.

Dick Heller walked out of D.C. police headquarters Monday, clutching a yellow firearms registration certificate stamped "approved." He gave the thumbs-up sign, grinned and said, "Victory!"

Heller was among the first people to seek a gun permit under new rules adopted after the Supreme Court struck down the city's 32-year-old handgun ban in June. Heller was the plaintiff in that case.

He won approval to keep a .22-caliber revolver at home after coming to police headquarters in July to be fingerprinted and take a firearms proficiency test. Police approved the weapon after completing a background check.

© 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Learn more about our Privacy Policy.
[Get Copyright Permissions]Click here for copyright permissions!
 
About Goddamn time. A HUGE +1 to Heller and all involved who fought (and still fight) for our right to keep and bear arms.
 
They keep using the word "weapon".
The media will always opt to use that word instead of "firearm".
"weapon" makes it sound like it's inevitably going to be used to intentionally harm someone. I hate that.
 
Agreed, but hell its better to have to register your gun thAn not have it.

Indeed.

Still, having to register a piddling .22 revolver is a pathetic result after years of fighting in court and thousands in legal fees.

AND an unincorporated, 5-4 decision at that.[rolleyes]
 
not to take the wind out of this.....I've got $10, the gun get stolen inside of 8 months. Waaaay too much publicity around this.
 
All that work and he can't even keep a 1911 or a Glock???

There has got to be more to this story!
 
All that work and he can't even keep a 1911 or a Glock???

There has got to be more to this story!

Actually, there is! He has a second lawsuit over the restrictions. Apparently Heller owned the .22 revolver but kept it "outside the District", which would partially explain why he brought that gun to the PD. Think about it--where else would he buy a new one? Also, it makes sense from a long, drawn out legal battle situation that he'd bring something completely benign and within full compliance to test the system.

But rest assured, Heller isn't done yet:

http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/...files-new-gun-case-takes-aim-at-semiauto-ban/

Dick Anthony Heller, who successfully challenged the District’s handgun ban in a landmark Supreme Court decision, is again suing the District of Columbia, LL has learned.

According to a complaint obtained by LL, Heller, along with co-plaintiffs Absalom M. Jordan Jr., and Amy McVey, are taking particular aim at the effective ban of semiautomatic pistols by the District’s gun regulations, which in essence ban all semiautomatic weapons as “machine guns.”

The lawsuit also takes two other exceptions to the District’s new gun regs. One is that the District’s registration process is unduly “onerous,” citing specifically the legislatively unrestricted fees that can be levied on a gun registrant. The other count holds that the District’s doctrine that a gun can only be loaded in the presence of a “reasonably perceived threat of immediate harm” constitutes a unreasonable infringement of handgun owners’ rights under the Heller decision.

The suit asks the court to issue injunctions that would (a) allow semiautomatic weapons that hold fewer than 12 rounds, (b) order the District to register handguns without a ballistics test, and (c) order the District not to enforce the “reasonably perceived threat” part of the handgun law.

When the new gun regulations were announced earlier this month, acting attorney general Peter Nickles told reporters he was certain that new lawsuits would be filed in response.

More to come.
 
Back
Top Bottom