Chevy 2 65
NES Member
What a mess. Not sure if I should laugh or cry.
Don't laugh or cry. Get mad, and keep up the phone calls, emails etc..
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
What a mess. Not sure if I should laugh or cry.
Ok, let's read ALL of the approved roster wording.
the queens super seceret list paragraph is STILL IN THERE .
So no glocks, it's for your saftey, the AG doesn't care about police saftey.she allows them to carry unsafe pistols. If a cop does an n.d
,I see a lawsuit against glock and the AG , it's the guns fault.
but I digress, the wording is here
Massachusetts licensed firearms dealers should note that the transfers of handguns are alsosubject to the Attorney General’s Handgun Sales Regulations, 940 CMR 16.00, et seq. Firearmson this Approved Firearms Roster do not necessarily comply with the requirements of theAttorney General’s Handgun Sales Regulations. Information about those regulations, as well asthe Enforcement Notice may be obtained from the Office of the Attorney General and may beaccessed on the website of the Attorney General (www.ago.state.ma.us).”
I don't see any leftist Dem AG ever giving up the secret list. It's too powerful a tool of control and intimidation against us peasants.Right. The Glocks are not new to the roster. They've been on it a while - at least since the 2010 version I've got archived. Like W.E.C. says, it's the secret "other" list (the one where dealers find out only in the negative) that doesn't let dealers sell Glocks to mere peons.
I don't see any leftist Dem AG ever giving up the secret list. It's too powerful a tool of control and intimidation against us peasants.
Oh, we all know it's a criteria (as you put it) and not an actual "double top secret" list, printed in invisible ink, that she keeps in her top center combination-locked fancy underwear drawer.You're missing the core concept of the regulation: it's criteria, not a list. If Jim Wallace became AG tomorrow, he would be unable to tell us what's on this list that has never existed.
Yup, no more secret list I guess.
"Any handgun on the current version of the state’s Approved Firearms Roster" Freedom has died in this state
What's stopping them from having a truck/car state approved list.
Just heard from a dealer who transferred a preban Colt AR15 6 days ago. The AG's office called him asking for verification that the gun was indeed preban.
They are watching and waiting to bust someone.
Just heard from a dealer who transferred a preban Colt AR15 6 days ago. The AG's office called him asking for verification that the gun was indeed preban.
They are watching and waiting to bust someone.
Just heard from a dealer who transferred a preban Colt AR15 6 days ago. The AG's office called him asking for verification that the gun was indeed preban.
They are watching and waiting to bust someone.
Just heard from a dealer who transferred a preban Colt AR15 6 days ago. The AG's office called him asking for verification that the gun was indeed preban.
They are watching and waiting to bust someone.
Wow. I thought police investigated crimes and made arrests...I guess not anymore. AGO is one stop shopping! So in these cases, what's the correct response? Refer the AG to your lawyer? I don't see how direct cooperation is constructive if you're doing something legal, I'd make them waste their time. This is harassment.
Just heard from a dealer who transferred a preban Colt AR15 6 days ago. The AG's office called him asking for verification that the gun was indeed preban.
They are watching and waiting to bust someone.
Unreal. Does an FFL have an obligation to furnish such information to the AG's office?
I will leave this here as well just to show how incompetent the AGO is:
.22 caliber
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
One would guess they could have figured out it was a pre-ban fairly easily if they wanted to but maybe I give the AG's office scum too much credit.Just heard from a dealer who transferred a preban Colt AR15 6 days ago. The AG's office called him asking for verification that the gun was indeed preban.
They are watching and waiting to bust someone.
One would guess they could have figured out it was a pre-ban fairly easily if they wanted to but maybe I give the AG's office scum too much credit.
Sounds to me more like another dealer fear & intimidation effort designed to get the word out that the Queen is watching.
Just heard from a dealer who transferred a preban Colt AR15 6 days ago. The AG's office called him asking for verification that the gun was indeed preban.
They are watching and waiting to bust someone.
Just heard from a dealer who transferred a preban Colt AR15 6 days ago. The AG's office called him asking for verification that the gun was indeed preban.
They are watching and waiting to bust someone.
I have reasons to believe this is a shop covering their ass... If you work your brain noodle you'll probably guess quickly where it was.That's cute that CJIS is allowing the AG seemingly unfettered access to their system.
It used to be they would tell the AG's office to go screw, and that the AG's office had to have very specific requests WRT data from MIRCS/EFA10. Apparently someone relented and gave them carte blanche
access... that gives me the warm fuzzies. I wonder if CJIS is giving them this data with the buyer info redacted, or wholly intact?
-Mike
my brain noodle is not working today.If you work your brain noodle you'll probably guess quickly where it was.
or notAt least that answers the question positively that transfer of prebans is not affected.
The AGO reserves the right to alter or amend this guidance.
I have reasons to believe this is a shop covering their ass... If you work your brain noodle you'll probably guess quickly where it was.
That's cute that CJIS is allowing the AG seemingly unfettered access to their system.
It used to be they would tell the AG's office to go screw, and that the AG's office had to have very specific requests WRT data from MIRCS/EFA10. Apparently someone relented and gave them carte blanche
access... that gives me the warm fuzzies. I wonder if CJIS is giving them this data with the buyer info redacted, or wholly intact?
-Mike
Unless there's a subpoena I'd say no.
At least that answers the question positively that transfer of prebans is not affected.