If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Oh man, the Baker slamming on this thread is hilarious
I can't wait for myself and my family and friends to vote against him
Talked to my State Rep (an R) on Saturday. Said it will be decided in the courts. Told him to thank Charlie for making it possible for me to stop maxing out my contributions to him. He said he was hearing a lot of that.
Yikes!!! As goes Boris, so goes the election. We are doomed.I'm ****ing voting Maura next election.
Yikes!!! As goes Boris, so goes the election. We are doomed.
...and Baker just appointed a progressive justice appointed by Deval to the SJC.
Remember when Rob Eno/Red State was all over GOAL for not supporting "conservative" Charlie Baker?
What a ****ing joke
I'm afraid next election it will be Maura for governor with Satan as Lt. gov vs another Brown turd with an R sticker.
- - - Updated - - -
I am thinking about writing to MASSGOP a letter about so called "hard stance" of Charlie. If these idiot will keep producing turds like Brown or Baker, I'm ****ing voting Maura next election.
Turns out Charlie knew about Healey's action well before it was launched.
This is exactly why GOAL did not support him.
BTW that "position" of his is called "ankle grab"
I don't get it, unless you are implying that confirmation of this POS "judge" is somehow a reach-around for Baker from Maura.
“Given the previous discussions and briefings we had with the administration (Baker's office), it was surprising to receive this letter,” said (Healey's) communications director Cyndi Roy Gonzalez.
In other words Bakers office was discussing it before it was released and they were surprised to get blowback.
http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/20...n-crackdown/pupqSFb406V3UUxK8xEbZI/story.html
Sorry, I cross pollinated my post replies, I thought he was looking for a source for the story about Baker appointing the judge.
Here's the source for Baker knowing about Healey's plan
“Given the previous discussions and briefings we had with the administration, it was surprising to receive this letter,” said communications director Cyndi Roy Gonzalez.
huh,
sounds like Baker had time to lube up
Exactly, I think Healey's PR flack slipped by saying that and most missed/ignored it.
huh,
sounds like Baker had time to lube up
Unfortunately, we'll never know the content of those briefings.
That's not where his finger went I assure you.
Unfortunately, we'll never know the content of those briefings.
That's not what happened, he and his staff knew full well what was comingFor all we know, the AG sent the Gov an email the day before "FYI - We're going to be stepping up enforcement of the Assault Weapons Ban. Nothing new, just enforcing the laws on the books. Kthxbye."
Can you also get them to vote against the A.G.? She won by 400,000 simpler solution get rid of her. There was never a law regarding reloading supplies shipped to your home, or Glocks being sold, these were all A.G. consumer protections going back three democratic A.G.'s?
If you think electing a Democrat to replace anyone in Mass is a challenge or win than you lost sight of the prize.
You can vote him out but don't forget who the real problem is. Maybe if he's is voted in and she is voted out than you might see real change. My Rep doesn't give a shit because he believes he stands no chance of losing his seat. He is a Democrat in a town where more than half the voters are of the same ethnic background. He does them favors they elect him.
P.S. I have also called his office and don't think he should get a free pass. Maybe no other Attorney General did this because their Democratic Governor at that time would have taken the heat?
Don't think this woman is stupid or doesn't have a agenda. She is saying Hillary look at me and my wife if you need to appoint Supreme Court Justices and anti gun Attorney Generals.
I know I am trying to turn voters one at a time but lets not lose sight of the forest through the trees.
If she is not elected in Mass. for whatever she runs for than all the Politicians will see it and hear it and take due notice.
If Baker loses and she wins than it's business as usual. No Legislator or Senator will give a shit and nothing will change and nothing we say will be heard.
For all we know, the AG sent the Gov an email the day before "FYI - We're going to be stepping up enforcement of the Assault Weapons Ban. Nothing new, just enforcing the laws on the books. Kthxbye."
The Gov has questioned the AG's actions. It serves the AG to discredit the Gov at this point. It's working. Don't let her.