If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
This is why Warren’s DNA stunt was such a blunder: She took Trump’s DNA-test dare and let him divide us — again — by race and ethnicity, just as he did when he goaded President Barack Obama to prove his legitimacy by producing his birth certificate.
That’s un-possible!! Morally superior moonbat can do no wrong!!Telling:
Why, no. What the Left still cannot seem to grok is that it isn't Trump doing the dividing by race and ethnicity, they are. He's merely throwing it back in their faces.
Telling:
Why, no. What the Left still cannot seem to grok is that it isn't Trump doing the dividing by race and ethnicity, they are. He's merely throwing it back in their faces.
Smart move by Warren.
Get it out there, and over time the ruckus will die down.
Just in time for the 2020 presidential run.
Smart move by Warren.
Get it out there, and over time the ruckus will die down.
Just in time for the 2020 presidential run.
It absolutely will not. Trump won't let it. And the elephants appear to have awakened finally, and elephants never forget.Smart move by Warren.
Get it out there, and over time the ruckus will die down.
Just in time for the 2020 presidential run.
Except that the Spaniards were white, and were in Tucson in 1776 (and probably further into the country by then as well).a Native American relative appears in her family tree 6 to 10 generations ago....
...That would make Warren 1/32nd Native American. But if her ancestor is 10 generations back, that could mean she’s just 1/512th Native American, according to the report. That could further excite her critics instead of placating them.
She's a couple of years older than me, so this is relative: I can trace back to my x6 grandfather, born in 1754, his parents and grandparents, to 1677 in the US, so that's a x8 reference. Pilgrims arrived in 1620, that would be a x10 reference. She's from Oklahoma, which didn't see white men until the early 1819 in the Louisana Purchase.
more bullshit from her
A non-native family wanted to adopt a child. The child was found to be 1/64th NA, and under some bogus Federal law, had to be placed with a Native family. I think for BIA registration, the standard is 1/32, IIRC.and she claimed she was a Native American at Harvard. I am more Native American than she is as my great great grandmother was 100% and I do not claim anything at all. Why? 1. Because it is hearsay and I cannot prove it. 2. I would be at most 1/8 (I think my math is correct) and I hear that you are not entitled to any benefit at all unless you are at least 1/4.
So why claim something I cannot prove.
She is a fraud. She changed her ethnicity to Native American. At 1/512th she is more everything else than Native American so that is a lie.
She claimed to be an American Indian on an application to the Texas Bar in1986.......
https://www.washingtonpost.com/resi...aws.com/public/MT5TG7RJU4I6TGCNTOH3UAB6QE.png
She claimed to be an American Indian on an application to the Texas Bar in1986.......
https://www.washingtonpost.com/resi...aws.com/public/MT5TG7RJU4I6TGCNTOH3UAB6QE.png
Bye bye 2020 bid.She claimed to be an American Indian on an application to the Texas Bar in1986.......
https://www.washingtonpost.com/resi...aws.com/public/MT5TG7RJU4I6TGCNTOH3UAB6QE.png
Can I get me a war whoop here?She claimed to be an American Indian on an application to the Texas Bar in1986.......
Bye bye 2020 bid.
She's too much of a narcissist to just drop out. She'll have to be drummed out by the DNC. War drums, if you like.