Granny Warren really an Indian?? She supposedly took a DNA test

The5thDentist said:
Huge!
Opinion | Canned crab? Elizabeth Warren is unfit to lead.
Click to expand...

Telling:
This is why Warren’s DNA stunt was such a blunder: She took Trump’s DNA-test dare and let him divide us — again — by race and ethnicity, just as he did when he goaded President Barack Obama to prove his legitimacy by producing his birth certificate.
Click to expand...

Why, no. What the Left still cannot seem to grok is that it isn't Trump doing the dividing by race and ethnicity, they are. He's merely throwing it back in their faces.
 
SpaceCritter said:
Telling:


Why, no. What the Left still cannot seem to grok is that it isn't Trump doing the dividing by race and ethnicity, they are. He's merely throwing it back in their faces.
Click to expand...
That’s un-possible!! Morally superior moonbat can do no wrong!!
 
44243179_297797097491915_9142607384466685952_n.jpg
 
SpaceCritter said:
Telling:


Why, no. What the Left still cannot seem to grok is that it isn't Trump doing the dividing by race and ethnicity, they are. He's merely throwing it back in their faces.
Click to expand...

Bingo. If they just stopped with the identity politics bullshit this would never have happened. I personally am thrilled this hyper PC bullshit is eating it’s own.
 
Smart move by Warren.

Get it out there, and over time the ruckus will die down.

Just in time for the 2020 presidential run.
 
Palladin said:
a Native American relative appears in her family tree 6 to 10 generations ago....
...That would make Warren 1/32nd Native American. But if her ancestor is 10 generations back, that could mean she’s just 1/512th Native American, according to the report. That could further excite her critics instead of placating them.


She's a couple of years older than me, so this is relative: I can trace back to my x6 grandfather, born in 1754, his parents and grandparents, to 1677 in the US, so that's a x8 reference. Pilgrims arrived in 1620, that would be a x10 reference. She's from Oklahoma, which didn't see white men until the early 1819 in the Louisana Purchase.

more bullshit from her
Click to expand...
Except that the Spaniards were white, and were in Tucson in 1776 (and probably further into the country by then as well).

robjax said:
and she claimed she was a Native American at Harvard. I am more Native American than she is as my great great grandmother was 100% and I do not claim anything at all. Why? 1. Because it is hearsay and I cannot prove it. 2. I would be at most 1/8 (I think my math is correct) and I hear that you are not entitled to any benefit at all unless you are at least 1/4.

So why claim something I cannot prove.

She is a fraud. She changed her ethnicity to Native American. At 1/512th she is more everything else than Native American so that is a lie.
Click to expand...
A non-native family wanted to adopt a child. The child was found to be 1/64th NA, and under some bogus Federal law, had to be placed with a Native family. I think for BIA registration, the standard is 1/32, IIRC.
 
whacko said:
Bye bye 2020 bid.
Click to expand...

Meh, the base to which she panders will not care. These are the types of a**h***s who think her DNA test exonerates her and validates her claim. She was never going to win for the same reasons Hillary didn't--she's old, white and unlikable--but this won't make her drop out.
 

Similar threads

A California sheriff's deputy had a double-life with an outlaw motorcycle gang, police say
Replies
4
Views
260
Bt74
Bt74
Whats the difference between a port and an expansion chamber
Replies
2
Views
159
jkelly1229
J
College students have gotten really stupid.
Replies
17
Views
842
ridleyman
R
Wilbraham, MA cop shot, suspect supposedly barricaded in home with kids
Replies
4
Views
569
breslau
breslau
How an Oklahoma man double-crossed a Mexican cartel with knockoff guns.
Replies
5
Views
379
jkelly1229
J
Back
Top Bottom