If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
My dumbass brother-in-law took one, he’s English, Irish, Swedish according to his parents/grandparents places of birth. He camo out 0.5% Asian!! He does have a stronger than average love for Chinese food.Those tests are kind of a joke. There's no genetic marker for race, ashkenazi jews may be the exception. If you had dna from the whole world from a couple hundred years ago it'd be more of an accurate thing.
Either way, She makes me a little nauseous.
So, she lied and is saved by what really happens to be a coincidence. My shocked face.
She makes me puke. I despise her. But she's native and she's running for president. I called it a couple of months ago.
she's sly. she picked a tribe, cherokee, that recognizes lineal descendants. they don't really care how far back it goes but the decendant has to be listed in a 1924 registration listing. it's a little more complicated, you'd have to look it up. but it pretty much could mean a descendant did a favor for a marauding indian warrior and swallowed.Those tests are not definitive plus it’s a 10th generation hit....
..a Native American relative appears in her family tree 6 to 10 generations ago....
...That would make Warren 1/32nd Native American. But if her ancestor is 10 generations back, that could mean she’s just 1/512th Native American, according to the report. That could further excite her critics instead of placating them.
Interesting on how this plays out. Take a few tests and cherry pick the results.The best is that she is 3.1% and the range is 3%- 0.2% but then again the average Joe can't understand math. This still looks like a reach to me but gives plenty of ammo two both sides.
I'd say this is Cultural Appropriation (I hate that term) as she has no formal tribal membership.
I wonder what they think of this in Real America......
So can she share in tribal casino profits?
That's what's really important,if she would be recognized by her own people.
a Native American relative appears in her family tree 6 to 10 generations ago....
...That would make Warren 1/32nd Native American. But if her ancestor is 10 generations back, that could mean she’s just 1/512th Native American, according to the report. That could further excite her critics instead of placating them.
She's a couple of years older than me, so this is relative: I can trace back to my x6 grandfather, born in 1754, his parents and grandparents, to 1677 in the US, so that's a x8 reference. Pilgrims arrived in 1620, that would be a x10 reference. She's from Oklahoma, which didn't see white men until the early 1819 in the Louisana Purchase.
more bullshit from her
Oh no. She still lied. There is no saving. It's STILL a lie.
It would be like me claiming to be a Viking. Maybe, just maybe, there's a potential 6-10 generation ago relative on some side that could confirm that.
But that's not me being a Viking. It isn't discussed around the kitchen table for generations how we are "from good Viking stock."
She lied. This is a continuation of the lie. Hell, we don't even know if the test is legit. A professor at a university, you say???? He has no stake is all of this.
I have my genealogy, my mother's side going back to 1583 in France(the father of that ancestor as well but no info on him) and that's my 12x grandparents. Info is out there.