I think
@Coyote33's issue stems from him only viewing the impact of Bruen's direct case law that licenses must be issued based on objective standards.
And since that singular aspect of the decision doesn't have great effect here in Mass to the majority, he doesn't see it as important as the rest of us.
The problem is that view is horribly myopic - look at what happened to license issuance in New York, New Jersey, Maryland and Hawaii. The unobtainable suddenly became possible. Yes, they passed new laws trying to bypass Bruen but those will be relatively short lived. Alito's response to the request to stay the NY law proves that SCOTUS is ready to pounce if the circuit Court drags its feet.
The direct decision in Bruen has had massive impact in places where licenses were only available to the elite and connected. It actually had effect on a
quarter of the population.
Now it's time for Bruen's dicta in the TH&T standard to percolate through the circuits in other aspects of the 2A.
This is where things start to get mirky - because SCOTUS didn't clearly define exactly what is within Text, History and Tradition there will be some disagreement among the circuits. NY and Maryland have already gone FR on restrictions trying everything to see.what will be allowed. However even the antigun legal minds admit most ot NY's law has no chance of survival.
Just because an individual's personal anti-gun pet peeves haven't been rectified doesn't mean a particular decision was not monumental.