Martlet: no one here has said you are a horrible member because you don't volunteer your time at the club.
Go back and read the thread, then. Essentially, it was said that people who criticize yet don't volunteer aren't good members. Even reading your response, I take away that same opinion. Either I'm misunderstanding, or someone isn't explaining themselves well.
What I've said is that if you don't help out, then your complaints are less likely to get the full encouragement of the board. The board members are simply people, with all the foibles of anyone else. Put yourself in the place of board member. Think about what it would be like if you spent hours of your own time working at the club, trying to police safety, improve the facilities, keep it clean because people won't pick up after themselves, and then hours more wrestling with disciplinary procedures against knuckleheads. How would you feel when members criticize your work but make no effort to help out? You think you can do better? Great, come on in and help out. I'm sure they've got plenty of projects for you to help with if you can't convince the board to support your own proposals.
I don't have the time. Isn't that why I pay extra every year? To make up for not having time?
You've identified issues that will take the boards time to work out. You are telling them that they need to work harder and spend more of their limited free time to do X, Y, and Z, but you're not willing to help out. Why you are surprised and angry that they don't just jump to it?
Because they volunteered to do it. I should expect people who volunteer to do a job to not want to do it?
Yes, you pay your dues. Great, I'm sure MRA needs the money. The reality is that if no one gave their time, these clubs would fold. The dues money is not nearly enough to pay for employees. If you are not helping out at the club, then (like most members) you are leeching off the backs of those who do, those who give their time to support the club and preserve shooting in eastern MA.
Ahhh. I'm a leech now. If people who pay their dues, AND EXTRA IF THEY HAVEN'T THE TIME TO VOLUNTEER, are merely leeches, then why not have volunteer work as a requirement, not an option? The fact remains that it IS an option, which I choose to use. Now you're saying I'm a leech. Nice.
As for your statement about elitism, I'm sorry, but that's really wrong. You are criticizing the club and board in public without having given them the opportunity to respond to your concerns and/or tell you their plans for addressing them. You are really damaging them as an organization, potentially driving away new members, without letting them address the issues first. And then you claim that they are being "elitist" for not wanting to engage in a flame war with you on an open forum. I'm sorry, but I think you are being very, very unfair to the MRA board.
I've stopped into the office several times. Yesterday I was helped. The other 2 times in as many months I was essentially told nothing will change in a very unpleasant manner. Not wanting to engage in a "flame war" has nothing to do with the elitist attitude I mentioned. You're wrong on that point. Additionally, if they didn't want to engage, then why post?
And to repeat, I am not a member of MRA. I've been perhaps the most vocal person on this thread who is disagreeing with you. So your criticism here: is misguided. I'm neither an officer nor member of MRA. In fact, I don't think I know any of the board at MRA.
Riverside had a range qualification test when I joined last year.
If you aren't a member, what are you basing your defense on? Is it just a "general defense"?
As I have stated, I have no problem with the existence of a range qualification test. I have a problem with the fact that it is ONLY given on Sunday mornings at 9am, and the few times I showed up they were unable to give it. They offer no alternative time.