Like they should be surprised, right?
This state sucks.........
http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news/17025116/detail.html
This state sucks.........
http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news/17025116/detail.html
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
I swear anyone touches my kids
I will be going to jail
Well no one to press charges for Beatrice assaulting Rodriguez ..... charges dropped.
I swear anyone touches my kids [...]
Police said they empathized with the boy's father, but would have preferred if Beatrice had detained the suspect until police arrived.
yeah... i'll file that under the "piss off" folder, thank you very much.
sorry men and women in Blue. anyone touches my child inapporiately... and he/she will surely be detained. an uncouncious man cannot flee. I was simply "detaining" him.
Seems like he was paying attention. Presumably one has to be there to see the perve touch the kid and then to take action.
Police charged Beatrice with assault. Police said they empathized with the boy's father, but would have preferred if Beatrice had detained the suspect until police arrived.
That is so sad that one can't be playful with youngsters now-a-days. Totally different from when we grew up. And with reguard to Rodriguez, the MFer is not in country IMNSFHO.No kidding, I get real defensive when people get near my boy in public.
My son and I were at the playground today and this little girl, must have been about 3 years old, kept trying to come up and hug me. I had to keep backing away with my arms up to get away from her. She was just being sweet, but I ain't touching nobody else's kid on the playground unless it's to keep them from hurting themselves.
Can you beat someone down if they resist a citizen's arrest?
“It is unfortunate that there appears to be some type of public assumption that the police stopped a father from protecting his son and let a child molester go, that is absolutely not true,” he said.
…Rodriguez posed no apparent threat to the public.
...said the parties were summonsed because neither has criminal records nor warrants
Police said Beatrice “could have detained the man and had a witness call the authorities.”
Than you are even stupider than I originally gave you credit for.“I’m shocked - completely shocked,” Raynham Police Chief Lou Pacheco said of Valerio Rodriguez’ no-show at Taunton District Court today.
You mean other than the one that's a border jumper and child molester?Pacheco said the parties were summonsed because neither has criminal records nor warrants and Rodriguez posed no apparent threat to the public.
So if I grab a woman's posterior who doesn't want me to I can claim it was 'just joking around' and that makes it not a sexual assault?And while the father claims the incident was an outright sexual assault, there was an arguable dispute on the facts, as the elderly man who could only speak through an interpreter, said he was “just joking around,” Pacheco later said in a prepared statement.
You call it an assumption I call it an obvious fact.“It is unfortunate that there appears to be some type of public assumption that the police stopped a father from protecting his son and let a child molester go, that is absolutely not true,” he said.
Notice he said "could" instead of "will". I guess that means he won't.He said he could request a rendition order from the Bristol County District Attorney’s office to have Rodriguez picked up in Rhode Island and handed over to Massachusetts’ authorities.
The real fact of the matter is that NO father can rest well at night, knowing this guy is out on the loose.