MGL 269 s. 10 (h):
(h) Whoever owns, possesses or transfers possession of a firearm, rifle, shotgun or ammunition without complying with the requirements relating to firearm identification cards as provided in section 129C of chapter 140
THIS
IS
BAYSTATE!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmOH5f1J1Uc
(kicking DeerKiLLer into well)
You are taking ONE section of ONE statute and thinking it is the be-all and end-all of the analysis. On its face, it DOES appear to answer the question. However......
This is MA, where a "firearm" means ONLY handguns in one section of the law (140) and ANY gun in another (269).
Where, as opposed to Federal law, a bare frame is not a gun because functionality is required.
Where certain convictions are no longer a bar to issuance of an FID Card after 5 years - but anyone so issued a card will be in violation of FEDERAL law if they attempt to obtain a gun with that state-issued license.
Where a "permit to purchase" a handgun while possessing only an FID Card is still ostensibly legal under one section of the law, but possession of a handgun w/o an LTC is illegal under another section of the law.
A license is required to possess "ammunition," which includes sprays. Without a license, you cannot lawfully purchase powder, primers, bullets or cases in MA.
DeerkiLLer thinks merely purchasing out of state will suffice. Well, it may get you the components, but that just sets the purchaser up for troubles back in MA.
The exemption cited is for hunting. Fine. Unless you are in (or at least near) a hunting area, with your hunting license and preferably wearing camo or blaze orange, how does one PROVE one is hunting and not in the otherwise unlawful possession of ammunition?
If NOT actually engaged in hunting, the supposed exemption is not applicable. That makes it functionally near-useless and largely illusory.
How does one distinguish possession of black powder for hunting from possession for a BPR competition, re-enactment or simply sighting a gun in?
So much for simple answers......