I've been into combat pistol since the 60s We designed the matches to be too long range, and too many targets (to reflect reality of civilian SD) for a reason. It was to provide enough time diffence that stopwatch timing could determine who placed 1'st from who was 10th. today's timers have removed that problem.
So why not some matches that DO reflect reality? Either ccw starts thuout, or mostly just "raise and fire" starts, as in home, vehicle or business defense. Few people in the US get to openly wear pistols, almost nobody doe in any other country in the world. So it's a pointless exercise. Nobody wears those Star War rigs, either, so why allow them, or make them an advantage in the matches? It's just a pointless expense. Ditto the compensators and optical sights. You wont have them when needed, so "ability" with them might as well be abiltiy with the rifle. If shtf, the rifle might mean something, the star wars pistol sure won't.
So let's have a max range of 10 yds. If you want real accuracy, require brain hits at 10 yds (4" circles). Nobody has ever proven that they could reliably shoot better than that, when under fire, so why waste time and $ practicing what's unrealisitic?
Let's have most of the strings of fire at less than 10 ft, none at more than 3 targets, and only 10% of strings of fire at more than 2 targets. No more than half of them at more than 1 target, to reflect reality. When you shoot 1-2 dead, the others either flee, or they kill you anyway. There's almost no "in between' in reality.So why practice doing what is pointless? Big waste of time and $.
Let's have moving targets, and (for proven good gun handlers) fire with movement. contrary to what most claim, this DOES work, at reaslistic ranges (ie, 10 ft and less) and it IS a necessary skill, too. Just standing there, exposed to enemy fire, shooting (and missing, in most cases, or getting hits that don't SUFFICE) is how you get shot. You can need to dodge blows from a pipe, knife, ball bat, chain, etc, you know. Better learn how to do so, while safely controling the gun and getting good hits, yes?
Such matches will attract new blood to our sport, you know! Many,many guys just snort at IPSC and IDPA, because they make so little more sense than bowling pin matches, Bullseye, Hunter Silohuette or PPC matches. They are not going to finish last because they use practical gear and tactics, because their egos won't permit that. They are also not going to drop the many thousands of $ and hours of practice needed to place will in a match that uses silly gear or tactics. Get rid of such baloney, and we'll get those guys competing/learning/teaching others.
So why not some matches that DO reflect reality? Either ccw starts thuout, or mostly just "raise and fire" starts, as in home, vehicle or business defense. Few people in the US get to openly wear pistols, almost nobody doe in any other country in the world. So it's a pointless exercise. Nobody wears those Star War rigs, either, so why allow them, or make them an advantage in the matches? It's just a pointless expense. Ditto the compensators and optical sights. You wont have them when needed, so "ability" with them might as well be abiltiy with the rifle. If shtf, the rifle might mean something, the star wars pistol sure won't.
So let's have a max range of 10 yds. If you want real accuracy, require brain hits at 10 yds (4" circles). Nobody has ever proven that they could reliably shoot better than that, when under fire, so why waste time and $ practicing what's unrealisitic?
Let's have most of the strings of fire at less than 10 ft, none at more than 3 targets, and only 10% of strings of fire at more than 2 targets. No more than half of them at more than 1 target, to reflect reality. When you shoot 1-2 dead, the others either flee, or they kill you anyway. There's almost no "in between' in reality.So why practice doing what is pointless? Big waste of time and $.
Let's have moving targets, and (for proven good gun handlers) fire with movement. contrary to what most claim, this DOES work, at reaslistic ranges (ie, 10 ft and less) and it IS a necessary skill, too. Just standing there, exposed to enemy fire, shooting (and missing, in most cases, or getting hits that don't SUFFICE) is how you get shot. You can need to dodge blows from a pipe, knife, ball bat, chain, etc, you know. Better learn how to do so, while safely controling the gun and getting good hits, yes?
Such matches will attract new blood to our sport, you know! Many,many guys just snort at IPSC and IDPA, because they make so little more sense than bowling pin matches, Bullseye, Hunter Silohuette or PPC matches. They are not going to finish last because they use practical gear and tactics, because their egos won't permit that. They are also not going to drop the many thousands of $ and hours of practice needed to place will in a match that uses silly gear or tactics. Get rid of such baloney, and we'll get those guys competing/learning/teaching others.
Last edited: