If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Investors worth $634 billion are pushing gun control in every way possibleIn the end there will be a compromise. Likely a redo of the AWB. It’s reality and it’s coming
If you think all of the laws I cited above are reasonable and consistent with the Second Amendment, try comparing firearms with the treatment of books under the First Amendment. If anyone were even to suggest that publishers be licensed by the government, dangerous books banned, or that individuals had to receive government permission before buying a book, people would turn purple and smoke would come out of their ears.
This is the only compromise left for me:
You agree not to take my gun and I agree not to shoot you.
Warning: If you come to KT......(KY) don't bring any liberal politics or belief systems with you as you will not fit.
That won't be a compromise. It will be an attempted taking.
I talked to a realty agent in KY, my worry wasn't fitting in, it was understanding the language.
They believe that anything less than a total gun ban is a compromise, and an unreasonable one at that!What is the anti side willing to give up?
This would still require approval of 3/4 of the states - even amendments like the balanced budget proposal couldn't get near that. Unless a group of states secedes, I don't see any amendments, especially the elimination of the second amendment - getting over the legal hurdles.
Sadly, irrelevant. They need not repeal the 2nd. They've been and will remain very successful just totally ignoring it.
“According to the FBI, in 2015, 6,447 people were killed by handguns. The total number of people killed by rifles of all types was only 252, less than half the number of people (624) murdered by means of “hands, fists, and feet.” Yet the current obsession is not to ban handguns, but to outlaw AR-15s and other semi-automatic rifles.”
I was not aware that Constitutionally enumerated rights could be compromised on.
I hope they keep going on the full retard gun mantra because the crazier they get the more people resolve to silently vote against them in the next election
Until they start thinking about this with a shotgun:Washington Navy Yard shooting - WikipediaThere is a compromise. It just doesnt include us. Its between anti gunners and their FUDD hunter friends. The FUDD's agree about giving up the scary rifles because "if you cant hit the target with 1 bullet you shouldnt be shooting" and the Anti's leave the bolt action rifles and shotguns alone. That is where the Compromise is, there is a reason Anti Gunners always love having those types of "2A Supporters" in their committees, on their panels, etc. It gives them "credibility"
Unfortunately (WRT to this issue), yes.Have you lived in this country at any time in the past 84 years?