"Communism,socialism isnt so bad"

Joined
Nov 24, 2012
Messages
349
Likes
41
Location
Alstead NH
Feedback: 14 / 0 / 0
My wife brings our children to a play group every week. This morning she returns with this little gem of a story
Her and two other moms were discussing the inauguration, fire arms and just general politics. When one of the mothers states "it's not like communism and socialism is so bad, I mean at least the gov't would be taking care of us"
This is a single mom, with literally no one else. We live in a fairly higher than average income part of Ma. So it's almost easy to see why she's looking for that in her life. She's flying solo. The unfortunate part is the obvious one. Govt dependence. With so many single moms it may be an area most have neglected to consider. By the way. She is also a big proponent of the Obama anti gun rush. Not because of any other reason than if he doesn't like it, than I don't ether. So is Obama the new federal Baby's daddy?
 
Stalin_Thanks_BO.jpg
 
I was discussing with folks last night, why are they so ****ing retarded?

No seriously, Why are people so godamned idiotic and ****ing full blown der deeeerrrr derrrr that they can't see how bad stuff like this is? I'm totally dumbfounded by it
 
how about a one way ticket to a commie country of her choice? It would be cheaper for us. If she is bitching about, tell her there is no reason to experiment here, just go to Cuba or STFU.



My wife brings our children to a play group every week. This morning she returns with this little gem of a story
Her and two other moms were discussing the inauguration, fire arms and just general politics. When one of the mothers states "it's not like communism and socialism is so bad, I mean at least the gov't would be taking care of us"
This is a single mom, with literally no one else. We live in a fairly higher than average income part of Ma. So it's almost easy to see why she's looking for that in her life. She's flying solo. The unfortunate part is the obvious one. Govt dependence. With so many single moms it may be an area most have neglected to consider. By the way. She is also a big proponent of the Obama anti gun rush. Not because of any other reason than if he doesn't like it, than I don't ether. So is Obama the new federal Baby's daddy?
 
Oh, communist and socialist governments take care of their people alright.

communist20execution20china.jpg

Oh stop it, anyone can clearly tell that is photoshopped, and that the original he is really fanning him with a palm leaf, and patting him on the back for all the hard work he has done for the greater good.
 
From Jeff Jacoby, 1995 (sent to me via email--no copyright infringement)


In 1993, President Clinton signed Public Law 103-199, authorizing a memorial
in Washington to those who died in the ``unprecedented imperial Communist
holocaust'' that began in 1917. It is a memorial long overdue. And it is
well-suited to Washington, the capital of the Free World and the headquarters of
what President Kennedy called the ``long twilight struggle'' against the
totalitarians of the Left. When completed, the Victims of Communism Memorial
will include a museum documenting the crimes committed by the disciples of Marx
and Lenin; original artifacts from the bitter night of Communist brutality (a
piece of the Berlin Wall, a cell from the ``Hanoi Hilton''); and a database
preserving the names of those wiped out in history's greatest slaughter.

Or at least as many of those names as can be identified. It is impossible
that we shall ever know them all. Every one of the hundreds of thousands of
Cossacks butchered on Lenin's orders in 1919? Every Miskito Indian killed in
Nicaragua under the Sandinistas? Every Chinese peasant, all 2 million-plus of
them, obliterated during Mao Zedong's ``land reform'' in the early 1950s?
Impossible.

For pure murderous evil, there has never been a force to compare with
Communism. The Nazis didn't come close. The Holocaust was uniquely malignant -
never before or since did one people construct a vast industry of death for the
sole purpose of rounding up and destroying every single member of another
people. But the Nazis exterminated 11 million innocents; the Communist death
toll surpasses 100 million. Nazi power lasted from 1933 to 1945. The Communist
nightmare began in November 1917, and continues to this day.

Savagery has always been a hallmark of Communism. It is an ideology that
requires the destruction of human beings. ``We have never rejected terror in
principle,'' wrote Lenin in 1901, ``nor can we do so.''

Half a century later, even as he denounced the extremes to which his
predecessors went, Nikita Khrushchev vowed that the terror so esteemed by Lenin
would go on. ``The questioning of Stalin's terror,'' he cautioned the Twentieth
Party Congress in 1956, ``may lead to the questioning of terror in general. But
Bolshevism believes in the use of terror.'' Not long afterward, Khrushchev sent
3,000 Soviet tanks to crush the Hungarian freedom fighters.

Communism equals murder. Everywhere. Always.

In Ukraine, for example, where 7 million people were starved to death on the
Kremlin's orders. ``If you go now to the Ukraine or the North Caucuses,'' wrote
British journalist Malcolm Muggeridge in 1933, ``exceedingly beautiful countries
and formerly amongst the most fertile in the world, you will find them like a
desert; ... no livestock or horses; villages deserted; peasants famished, often
their bodies swollen, unutterably wretched.'' Farmers who took grain or
vegetables from their own land were shot. Dead bodies littered the streets of
Kharkov, the capital. ``It was,'' an eyewitness later recalled, ``as if the
Black Death had passed through.''

Communism equaled murder in Ethiopia, where Mengistu Haile Mariam became
dictator in 1977 and embarked on what he called his ``Red Terror.'' Tens of
thousands were massacred, including the graduating seniors of almost every high
school in Addis Ababa.

Communism equaled murder in North Vietnam as far back as 1945, when Ho Chi
Minh resolved to annihilate his Nationalist rivals. ``It was appalling,''
recorded the historian Lucien Bodard. ``Thousands, maybe tens of thousands of
men had been liquidated .... The intention was that horror and dread should
extinguish the last trace of respect for them among the masses: Their execution
had to be both shameful and terrifying. That was the reason for the mass
executions of hundreds at once, the fields of prisoners buried alive, the
harrows dragged over men buried up to the neck.''

Communism equaled murder in Tibet, where Mao's campaign to extirpate Buddhist
culture turned 1.2 million Tibetans into corpses. It equaled murder in gentle
Cambodia, where the bloodlust of the Khmer Rouge vaporized one-third of the
nation in less than four years. It equaled murder in Cuba, in East Germany, in
Afghanistan. From Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic - murder. In
the Gulag and the laogai - murder. At Tienanmen Square - murder. In the Korean
War and the Vietnam War, in the forest of Katyn and the dungeons of the Lubyanka
- murder.

One hundred million victims of Communism. And those are only the victims who
were slain. It doesn't include those who were maimed or driven mad. Those whose
lives went dark when a loved one was butchered. Those who spun out their years
in potato queues, in vodka stupors, in daily fear. It doesn't include those who
wasted 30 years as slaves in Siberia. The boat people who flung themselves into
the South China Sea. The stifled poets, the gagged priests, the tormented
refuseniks, the exiled democrats.
Rarely do we think of them, or of the hundred million. We forget how
pathologically evil Communism has been, or why we poured so much blood and
treasure into fighting the Cold War. It is to correct that amnesia that the
Victims of Communism Memorial will be built.
 
how about a one way ticket to a commie country of her choice? It would be cheaper for us. If she is bitching about, tell her there is no reason to experiment here, just go to Cuba or STFU.


I'll pitch in a few hundred for airfare
 
My wife brings our children to a play group every week. This morning she returns with this little gem of a story
Her and two other moms were discussing the inauguration, fire arms and just general politics. When one of the mothers states "it's not like communism and socialism is so bad, I mean at least the gov't would be taking care of us"
This is a single mom, with literally no one else. We live in a fairly higher than average income part of Ma. So it's almost easy to see why she's looking for that in her life. She's flying solo. The unfortunate part is the obvious one. Govt dependence. With so many single moms it may be an area most have neglected to consider. By the way. She is also a big proponent of the Obama anti gun rush. Not because of any other reason than if he doesn't like it, than I don't ether. So is Obama the new federal Baby's daddy?

Let's have a group subscription to buy her one way ticket to Cuba... NK will be a bit too harsh.

Or, maybe, we can setup a re-education camp, let some people who had a chance of trying "real" thing run it. Finance it like reality show, with bets on who will want out first?
 
Last edited:
So it sounds like an intervention is in order. But I feel like it would be more along the lines of an exorcism.

Get a monk, a priest and a rabbi to perform the exorcism...

While the idea behind communism MIGHT be ok, the implementation of it (as already posted) leaves much to be desired. Beside, as so many countries found out (over time) it simply doesn't work. The people are not put first, so there's no change there. If anything the people are crushed under the boot of the state until they're a fine pulp.

I believe that the US was originally not going to get into WWII since the nazi's were against communism. But then Japan up and pissed us off, and I think enough people woke up to how batshit crazy Hitler was. As messed up as our country is right now, I can't even imagine how much worse it would be under communism. Enough moonbats will go along with it, but I suspect there would be open revolt from large segments of the [current] government, including the military (bringing them to our side). Although it seems like oblamma is trying to ease the country into that direction slowly, so as to not throw up any huge red flags.

Even though I'm between jobs, and money is tight, I'd toss a few dollars into the one way ticket for that person (and her child) to the country of OUR choice.
 
Get a monk, a priest and a rabbi to perform the exorcism...

While the idea behind communism MIGHT be ok, the implementation of it (as already posted) leaves much to be desired. Beside, as so many countries found out (over time) it simply doesn't work. The people are not put first, so there's no change there. If anything the people are crushed under the boot of the state until they're a fine pulp.

I believe that the US was originally not going to get into WWII since the nazi's were against communism. But then Japan up and pissed us off, and I think enough people woke up to how batshit crazy Hitler was. As messed up as our country is right now, I can't even imagine how much worse it would be under communism. Enough moonbats will go along with it, but I suspect there would be open revolt from large segments of the [current] government, including the military (bringing them to our side). Although it seems like oblamma is trying to ease the country into that direction slowly, so as to not throw up any huge red flags.

Even though I'm between jobs, and money is tight, I'd toss a few dollars into the one way ticket for that person (and her child) to the country of OUR choice.

There is nothing good in the idea that is built on assumption of perfect selfless people, with the same level of abilities and "needs".
From each by his/her abilities and to each by his/her needs assumes equalization and distribution of needs one way or the other. There could not be enough houses on the beach for everyone, for example.

In my time there was a joke: in the communist future in the usually empty store there is a sign - "today there is no need for butter and beef".
 
There is nothing good in the idea that is built on assumption of perfect selfless people, with the same level of abilities and "needs".
From each by his/her abilities and to each by his/her needs assumes equalization and distribution of needs one way or the other. There could not be enough houses on the beach for everyone, for example.

In my time there was a joke: in the communist future in the usually empty store there is a sign - "today there is no need for butter and beef".

Yeah, even thinking about it a bit shows serious flaws. At least in modern times. While it might sound good to an otherwise oppressed populace, the reality of it falls so far short of that idea it's not even funny.

I see the issue as human nature. Most of us want more of whatever we have. Or at least more of some of what we have. It drives us to improve, do better, etc.

I still say we should send her to a country of OUR choice though. Don't let her pick.

BTW, you can have my beach house spot. Just give me a good place out in the middle of nowhere (northern ME or NH would do just fine), where no one will bother me with the crap facing us today.
 
send her this pic, this is communism:

montana_de_cadaveres_en_un_gulag_sovietico.jpg


or just ask her for email address, there are a bunch people here who can tell her all about it.

What would be awesome would be for people like yourself, Yelena - and whomever else you can round up that has actually lived under Communism - to show up at one of those playdates - and educate the **** out of that ignorant beeatch.
 
Get a monk, a priest and a rabbi to perform the exorcism...

While the idea behind communism MIGHT be ok, the implementation of it (as already posted) leaves much to be desired. Beside, as so many countries found out (over time) it simply doesn't work. The people are not put first, so there's no change there. If anything the people are crushed under the boot of the state until they're a fine pulp.

I believe that the US was originally not going to get into WWII since the nazi's were against communism. But then Japan up and pissed us off, and I think enough people woke up to how batshit crazy Hitler was. As messed up as our country is right now, I can't even imagine how much worse it would be under communism. Enough moonbats will go along with it, but I suspect there would be open revolt from large segments of the [current] government, including the military (bringing them to our side). Although it seems like oblamma is trying to ease the country into that direction slowly, so as to not throw up any huge red flags.

Even though I'm between jobs, and money is tight, I'd toss a few dollars into the one way ticket for that person (and her child) to the country of OUR choice.

Hitler hated the commies far more than he hated the Western countries. You can see this quite clearly by the fact that he didn't abuse the crap out of France and Britain, Holland - etc - anywhere near the way he abused the Soviet Union. People also forget that a good part of the reason why he was gassing the Jews - is because it was felt that the Jews were also largely responsible for Communism.

http://www.iamthewitness.com/doc/Jews.and.Communism.htm

"Some call it Marxism — I call it Judaism."

(The American Bulletin, Rabbi S. Wise, May 5, 1935).



"It is legitimate to adopt a critical attitude toward the relatively large number of Jews who particularly in the first decade after the Bolshevik revolution collaborated with the Soviet Government in the persecution of other peoples."

Statement of researcher Michael Mills, an official of the government of Australia at Canberra. (Source: Forward, March 10, 2000)


Robert Wilton, a long time Russia correspondent for the London Times, said in his book The Last Days of the Romanovs

"According to the data furnished by the Soviet press, out of 556 important functionaries of the Bolshevik State there were in 1918-1919: 17 Russians, 2 Ukrainians, 11 Armenians, 35 Lets, 15 Germans, 1 Hungarian, 10 Georgians, 2 Poles, 2 Finns, 1 Karaim, 457 Jews.
As the decades past by—after the fateful year 1917—Judaized Khazars kept a firm hand on the helm of the government in the occupied land of Russia. In due time they built a bureaucracy to their heart's desire."



"The Communist soul is the soul of Judaism. Hence it follows that, just as in the Russian revolution the triumph of Communism was the triumph of Judaism, so also in the triumph of fascism will triumph Judaism."

(A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Rabbi Harry Waton, p. 143-144).



The American Hebrew September 10, 1920:

"The Bolshevist revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction, and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental and physical forces, become a reality all over the world."



Mr. Summers, US Consul General in Moscow on May 2, 1918 sent a telegram to the Secretary of State in Washington DC saying in part:

"Jew predominant in local Soviet government, anti-Jewish feeling growing among population which tends to regard oncoming Germans as deliverers."



In 1920, Winston Churchill wrote a long newspaper article regarding the recent Bolshevik seizure of Russia. After praising what he called the "national Jews" of Russia, he said:

"In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish efforts rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxemburg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide revolutionary conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster has ably shown, a definite recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworlds of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of the enormous empire.

There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creating of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly the very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders... In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astounding. And the prominent if not the principal part in the system of terrorism applied by the extraordinary Commissions for combating Counter Revolution has been take by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.

("Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People." Illustrated Sunday Herald, London, February 8, 1920.)



"The Red Terror became so wide-spread that it is impossible to give here all the details of the principal means employed by the [Jewish] Cheka(s) to master resistance; one of the most important is that of hostages, taken among all social classes. These are held responsible for any anti-Bolshevist movements (revolts, the White Army, strikes, refusal of a village to give its harvest etc.) and are immediately executed. Thus, for the assassination of the Jew Ouritzky, member of the Extraordinary Commission of Petrograd, several thousands of them were put to death, and many of these unfortunate men and women suffered before death various tortures inflicted by cold-blooded cruelty in the prisons of the Cheka. I have in front of me photographs taken at Kharkoff, in the presence of the Allied Missions, immediately after the Reds had abandoned the town; they consist of a series of ghastly reproductions such as: Bodies of three workmen taken as hostages from a factory which went on strike. One had his eyes burnt, his lips and nose cut off; the other two had their hands cut off.

The bodies of hostages, S. Afaniasouk and P. Prokpovitch, small landed proprietors, who were scalped by their executioners; S. Afaniasouk shows numerous burns caused by a white hot sword blade. The body of M. Bobroff, a former officer, who had his tongue and one hand cut off and the skin torn off from his left leg. Human skin torn from the hands of several victims by means of a metallic comb. This sinister find was the result of a careful inspection of the cellar of the Extraordinary Commission of Kharkoff. The retired general Pontiafa, a hostage who had the skin of his right hand torn off and the genital parts mutilated. Mutilated bodies of women hostages: S. Ivanovna, owner of a drapery business, Mme. A.L. Carolshaja, wife of a colonel, Mmo. Khlopova, a property owner. They had their breasts slit and emptied and the genital parts burnt and having trace of coal.

Bodies of four peasant hostages, Bondarenko, Pookhikle, Sevenetry, and Sidorfehouk, with atrociously mutilated faces, the genital parts having been operated upon by Chinese torturers in a manner unknown to European doctors in whose opinion the agony caused to the victims must have been dreadful. It is impossible to enumerate all the forms of savagery which the Red Terror took. A volume would not contain them. The Cheka of Kharkoff, for example, in which Saenko operated, had the specialty of scalping victims and taking off the skin of their hands as one takes off a glove...At Voronege the victims were shut up naked in a barrel studded with nails which was then rolled about. Their foreheads were branded with a red hot iron five pointed star. At Tsaritsin and at Kamishin their bones were sawed...At Keif the victim was shut up in a chest containing decomposing corpses; after firing shots above his head his torturers told him that he would be buried alive. The chest was buried and opened again half an hour later when the interrogation of the victim was proceeded with. The scene was repeated several times over. It is not surprising that many victims went mad."

(S.P. Melgounov, p. 164-166; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 151-153).



"The Communists are against religion (Christianity), and they seek to destroy religion; yet, when we look deeper into the nature of Communism, we see that it is essential nothing else than a religion (Judaism)."

(A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Rabbi Harry Waton, p. 138).


Near the end of WW2 - German military officers were trying to surrender to the Americans and the British - and convince the Americans and the British to join with the Germans - and turn around and defeat the Soviet Union.

We probably should have taken them up on their offer.
 
Well, I lived under socialism striving to be communism and though I was fairly young I remember well how it was. You couldn't talk about the politics in any negative way with friends, one of them could be a KGB informant. Long queues to buy toilet paper, whatever food was available, anything else. A lot more that can be described, she should try it if she thinks it's that great, like others mentioned - Cuba and North Korea will welcome her with open arms I'm sure. And if she says we are mean to suggest it - she can go cry on the shoulder of Father of the People Obama the 1st.
 
I was discussing with folks last night, why are they so ****ing retarded?

No seriously, Why are people so godamned idiotic and ****ing full blown der deeeerrrr derrrr that they can't see how bad stuff like this is? I'm totally dumbfounded by it

Most folks these days don't care enough to educate themselves, think (and I mean really think, not shallow fleeting thoughts), or make decisions contrary to what feels good right now. They care more about Kanye and Kim Kardashians baby name possibilities than real issues facing our country/countrymen. American Idol garners more open minded discussion than our nation's political concerns. Anything more than texting "lol.k.cya l8r." is a waste of time and takes away from more meaningful connections with Facebook friends and Twitter followers.
 
Here's a piece on early communism in America. It was an idea briefly tried in the very first days of the Mayflower landing.

http://www.thinking-catholic-strategic-center.com/Colonial-Communism.html

The first set of rules agreed upon after the Mayflower Covenant was to share equally in work and in produce. Each was assigned a plot to till, and they all brought their produce to be portioned out equally. It was the same with livestock, milk, wild game, fish, fur and whatever the land and the sea would provide. Each worked according to his ability, each was rewarded according to his need; sound familiar? Karl Marx could have been in charge.
But it simply wasn’t working. They were still starving; they were still entirely too dependent upon re-supply from the meager provisions of increasingly rare ships. When it looked like the end, when everyone was lacking in strength and health and the whole enterprise was on the brink of disaster, Governor Bradford reluctantly abandoned the Communist-like rules. He told everyone to take his assigned plot of ground and plant and do whatever he could for his own household and stave off starvation as best he could, completely on his own. Bradford, and everyone, thought that the colony was finished.


[banana]1000th post

A man naturally works harder and more cheerfully to benefit himself and his family than he does to benefit strangers or non-family members.
That’s it. That’s all there is to it. Here, in our earliest colonial history, we see a crystal-clear historical example of the success of free market capitalism and individual liberty over socialism and group dependency. It presents a classic example of the failure of socialism, and a classic example of the success of liberty, both at the same time. While man is very much a social being, he most certainly is not a herd animal. The inner sense of the right to personal ownership of private property - (Thou shalt not steal) – is a natural and normal inner sense, and to oppose that inner sense is to oppose human nature as well as the Law of God.
 
Last edited:
My buddy has been dating this Asian chick for a short time, and she is outrageously liberal. They got into an argument today about guns, this is how it went.

Liberal: (sarcasticly)"So How was the 2a demonstation yesterday"
My buddy: Good, great turnout. probably the safest place in Boston.
Liberal: Why??
My Buddy: Probably cause 99.9% of the people were carrying. There were kids there too.
Liberal: OMG, there were kids there???There are other ways to protect yourself.
My Buddy: Oh really, would if the guy has a gun??
Liberal:.........................Gun control works
My Buddy: Do u have stats to back that up???
Liberal:....................
My buddy: Chicago, no guns, Crime rate through the roof, England, no guns Crime rate throught the roof.
Liberal: ................
My buddy: Do u think criminals obey the gun laws.
Liberal: ......Some will in fear of going to jail.
My buddy: ARE U ****IN KIDDING ME???. I gotta go (click).
 
What would be awesome would be for people like yourself, Yelena - and whomever else you can round up that has actually lived under Communism - to show up at one of those playdates - and educate the **** out of that ignorant beeatch.

My experience shows this is useless, the socialists stick to their mantra: yes, it was bad, but it was the WRONG socialism, we will build the RIGHT one; it will be different here; it will be good socialism, etc.
 
Last edited:
My experience shows this is useless, the socialists stick to their mantra: yes, it was bad, but it was the WRONG socialism, we will build the RIGHT one.

It's often useless if you go there with the intent of educating and converting the person and having them walk away an unrepetent capitalist.


But if you go there with a different goal: which is to verbally and emotionally and intellectually abuse and torture the other person - then you can often come away with a raging success.

Never underestimate the power of denigrating a person an making them look like a complete jackass.
 
It's often useless if you go there with the intent of educating and converting the person and having them walk away an unrepetent capitalist.


But if you go there with a different goal: which is to verbally and emotionally and intellectually abuse and torture the other person - then you can often come away with a raging success.

Never underestimate the power of denigrating a person an making them look like a complete jackass.

Heh, I never tried to convert anyone into "capitalism". But I had numerous chances to have discussions, mostly internet, with US liberals, including socialists, and even one communist (rare breed, BTW, the Stalinist type).

The discussion was always going like I described: "OMG, this is terrible! But it will never be like this here!" Rationing of the health care (it WILL happen here, it is happening in GB -- Liverpool Care pathway) - - "OMG, you are delusional! It can happen only in USSR, the people on gov-t were sooooo bad! But it will never happen here! We will elect RIGHT people!" And yeah, USSR had constitution and elections! One clueless guy even asked me why Russians kept electing toads like Brezhnev. Oy.

So, I gave up. Now, I guess, I might consider writing a book - "Soviet style Health Care for Dummies".
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom