If you were able to go back to a transcript of the hearing, you'd notice the judge saying that he's going to approach the TRO only from the perspective of individual rights regarding the 2A and he would not at this time be dealing with the retailer's rights. In light of the prefacing comments at the start of the hearing, much of the rest makes sense how it unfolded. That ammo purchases are much like buying a bottle of liquor was mentioned - unfortunately he seemed to not care or ignored that line of argument.