If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
The First Circuit told Alfred Morin he couldn't challenge his license prohibition because he didn't apply for the 'right' combination of licenses. Well, now he can. He got the FID, the PTP was denied, and the NPD Chief gets sued again - Morin v. Lyver.
Just got out of the hearing. Now we wait. The last time around the decision took 33 days.
That would put us around Friday, October 4th to hear back?
What is the next step in this case?
Lots happened. First, I got up. Then I went downtown, to look for a job. Then I hung out in front of the drugstore.So, did anything happen today?
Lots happened. First, I got up. Then I went downtown, to look for a job. Then I hung out in front of the drugstore.
Lots happened. First, I got up. Then I went downtown, to look for a job. Then I hung out in front of the drugstore.
If the POTENTIAL sentence was more than one year in jail, regardless of what he actually served, he is prohibited under federal law from possessing firearms. Ask legendary UDT/SEAL Commander Richard Marcinko. He got 21 months federal and served 15. This after a heroic 30 plus years of Navy service as an officer. No sitting POTUS had the guts to pardon him. If this could happen to a decorated SPECOPS warrior like him, what do the rest of us peons have to look forward to?How is he a PP?
If the POTENTIAL sentence was more than one year in jail, regardless of what he actually served, he is prohibited under federal law from possessing firearms.
MGL Chapter 140 said:A prohibited person shall be a person who:
.
.
(ii) has, in any other state or federal jurisdiction, been convicted or adjudicated a youthful offender or delinquent child for the commission of ... (D) a violation of any law regulating the use, possession, ownership, transfer, purchase, sale, lease, rental, receipt or transportation of weapons or ammunition for which a term of imprisonment may be imposed
Incorrect.If the POTENTIAL sentence was more than one year in jail, regardless of what he actually served, he is prohibited under federal law from possessing firearms. Ask legendary UDT/SEAL Commander Richard Marcinko. He got 21 months federal and served 15. This after a heroic 30 plus years of Navy service as an officer. No sitting POTUS had the guts to pardon him. If this could happen to a decorated SPECOPS warrior like him, what do the rest of us peons have to look forward to?
Easy, the internet and such were not household common things at the time of the "offence".How could he not know about DC's oppresive gun laws?
2. Be punished by a potential sentence in excess of 2.5 years
2.0 correct. I had misdafelony on my mind.I thought it was 2 years, not 2.5.
Part of the argument was that the Commonwealth submitted a 90 page report prepared by the Government Accountability Office titled "States’ Laws and Requirements for Concealed Carry Permits Vary across the Nation" ( link here https://www.gao.gov/assets/600/592552.pdf ) . Obviously the Plaintiff did not the resources available to commission such study before he drove to D.C.How could he not know about DC's oppresive gun laws?
A decision should be coming anytime, or it could be months. Morin v. Lyver | Commonwealth Second AmendmentStill nothing???
Just got out of the hearing. Now we wait. The last time around the decision took 33 days.
That would put us around Friday, October 4th to hear back? ...
A decision should be coming anytime, or it could be months. Morin v. Lyver | Commonwealth Second Amendment
Actually, there are non-violent felonies that are not DQs federally but are in MA. Anti-trust and restraint of trade violations.