jpdopes
NES Member
Happened at a bank drive-through at 9am. Another bg off the streets!
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=973_1217721136
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=973_1217721136
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Speaking from experience? Or is it just the typical New England arrogance regarding flyover country?Missouri may not have much going for it
Speaking from experience? Or is it just the typical New England arrogance regarding flyover country?
The freedom people enjoy in Missouri and many other states in the midwest decisively trumps EVERYTHING Massachussetts has to offer.
Speaking from experience? Or is it just the typical New England arrogance regarding flyover country?
The freedom people enjoy in Missouri and many other states in the midwest decisively trumps EVERYTHING Massachussetts has to offer.
Agreed it did sound like he was perplexed that the victims weren't being charged with a crime for using a gun to defend themselves.2) The a**h*** TV talking head asking the reporter if charges were to be filed against the victims.
+1 What the hell kind of arrogance is that? Has he ever spent time in Missouri?
Guess you don't like bbq.
Huh?Sounds like the BG had a permit...
Sounds like the BG had a permit...
I feel for the husband. He did what he had to after being forced to defend his wife by low life trying to hold them up. Good shot too, by the sounds of it.
It was a bit confusing because at the end the reporter said "the victim has a permit.." The Bad Guy was 20, wouldn't he be too young for a CCW? I think maybe she was talking about the husband having a permit. He was the victim before the robber.
It was a bit confusing because at the end the reporter said "the victim has a permit.." The Bad Guy was 20, wouldn't he be too young for a CCW? I think maybe she was talking about the husband having a permit. He was the victim before the robber.
Duh - my bad.
Some of you guys do not understand midwestern-speak. The victim is ALWAYS the law-abiding citizen who is the subject of crime. The criminal is NEVER referred to as the victim. Sometimes they are referred to as the "alleged" robber, murderer, etc, but never as the victim.
Jose, Forgive us who live in MA, they have brainwashed us, we have a hard time separating the two. Am I the victim, is he the victim, who the hell is the victim.
I lived in Kansas for nine years and I am here to tell you it is a foreign country compared to Massachussetts. And that is a good thing.
Jose, Forgive us who live in MA, they have brainwashed us, we have a hard time separating the two. Am I the victim, is he the victim, who the hell is the victim.
You are the victim. Everyone in MA is a victim of.... I'm gonna shut up before I get another infraction.
"An open and shut case of self defense."
I don't know about that. I think if you try and rob someone and get yourself shot in the head, you definitely botched the robbery.Reporter mis-characterized it as a "botched robbery".
It was a successful defense of an attempted armed robbery.
It was a bit confusing because at the end the reporter said "the victim has a permit.." The Bad Guy was 20, wouldn't he be too young for a CCW? I think maybe she was talking about the husband having a permit. He was the victim before the robber.
You've been living in liberal country too long. That's the correct language. It is clear the Boston Globe's reporgramming is settling in!! Run away while you still can!!!