Why doesn't someone suggest that they get their license, and go through the process themselves? It would lend credence to the story.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk
-
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
-
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
CBS Wants to Interview On-line Purchasers
- Thread starter MA_Shooter
- Start date
yanici
NES Member
You misunderstood. I just want them to observe how I would buy a gun over the internet for myself, but with their money. They get to see it done and I get a firearm. Everybody's happy.
Come across like the redneck they're looking for before the interview, then get serious when the tape is rolling.
They are just waiting for the camo draped, the world is ending because Obama is a Muslim born in Kenya type with a grudge to settle to call in...thankfully the guys at work have hidden my phone.
Story will be used in support of "universal background checks" (i.e., no FTF sales). All the interview will be cut to say is that one person that bought the most "assault" type rifle and the words "I bought it on-line" and that is it. It is a set up for an assassination piece. They want a face so all the sheep will panic about all these guns flooding the state. The story will of course omit key factors like the AWB in MA or the fact that all LTC holders in MA would pass the background check as they have an LTC...
I worked in TV for a few year on production and this is how I would use it if I were a blank-hole socialist.
I worked in TV for a few year on production and this is how I would use it if I were a blank-hole socialist.
Actual experience: I get media calls now and then. A few years ago this reporter from a national business magazine called about a story he was doing related to tax shelters. He asked if a particular series of derivatives transactions were indicative of an illegal shelter. I offered to help him figure it out. He sent me more information. I told him there was no clear answer -- that the transactions could have a legitimate business purpose apart from tax and that one would need to know more about the underlying business to reach an opinion. I explained, very clearly, why this was true and offered legitimate hypothetical reasons a business might engage in the questioned transactions. That was the last time I talked to the reporter. Shortly thereafter I saw the story in the magazine claiming the opposite of what I told the reporter. Now I just tell them I don't have time to talk to them. In my admittedly limited experience they just want a quote to confirm the story they know they want to tell. If I don't give it to them they will just get someone else who will.
