If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS June Giveaway ***Keltec SUB2000***
Yeah but look what happened the last time we had a leader that stuck to his own ideals rather than what advisory groups and people around him asked and suggested.
There comes a point where Romneys decision to maintain his record is more about preserving his image rather than helping his constituants.
Hmm. From where I stand, Huckabee looks liberal solely on his spending and pardon record. Romney and Giuliani look a lot more like RINOs to me. Frankly, I am starting to warm up to Paul. Unless Thompson actually wakes up and starts to campaign, I am going to throw in for Paul. I really just don't see fundamental differences with Romney and Giuliani - because with both, they are talking quite differently from their record, so I have no idea what they will actually do. Ergo, they certainly do not get my vote, at least in the primary.I agree with you... there is no question that we are in a national pickle.
- Rudy is antigun.
- Huckabee is a liberal who just wants to be friends.
- John Mccain is a democrat, who I believe voted against all of bushes tax cuts and refuses to torture terrorists.
That leaves us with romney. He actually starts to look good when compared with the others.![]()
There is (or, was) - it's called a federal petition for relief from disability. The granting of such relief does not "erase" the felony, but erases the "gun disability".There should be some way, at the state or federal level, or both, for someone to "redeem" themselves of a nefarious past.
- John Mccain is a democrat, who I believe voted against all of bushes tax cuts and refuses to torture terrorists.
seems the real problem is not that Romney won't pardon the Iraq war vet (which is ridiculous also) but that the vet can't get an LTC even with that very minor mark on his otherwise clean record.
FYPI agree with you... there is no question that we are in a national pickle.
- Rudy is antigun.
- Huckabee is a liberal who just wants to be friends.
- John Mccain is a democrat, who I believe voted against all of bushes tax cuts and refuses to torture terrorists.
That leaves us with Ron Paul. He actually looks good when compared with the others.
I think McCain's reasons for not wanting to torture anyone are completely reasonable and understandable.
There is (or, was) - it's called a federal petition for relief from disability. The granting of such relief does not "erase" the felony, but erases the "gun disability".
Unfortunately, congress repeatedly votes to specifically de-fund the processing of such relief applications and the supreme court has ruled that individuals whose applications are not accepted may not appeal as the non-acceptance is not a denial.
I think McCain's reasons for not wanting to torture anyone are completely reasonable and understandable.
As for the original point of this thread, to me it seems the real problem is not that Romney won't pardon the Iraq war vet (which is ridiculous also) but that the vet can't get an LTC even with that very minor mark on his otherwise clean record.
Why did they not seek a CWF for the fellow or get the charge dismissed? Both parties in the incident seem to think of it as a non-event. Why did the guy plead guilty?
As for the original point of this thread, to me it seems the real problem is not that Romney won't pardon the Iraq war vet (which is ridiculous also) but that the vet can't get an LTC even with that very minor mark on his otherwise clean record.
Or, looking at the other side - when an American POW is waterboarded or chained naked until he s--ts himself is that a "professional interrogation technique" or "torture"? It's nasty business, but any side that uses the technique to extract information loses any legitimacy when complaining about the other side using it for a similar purpose.Why doesn't anyone ask him if, given the choice, he would chose water-boarding over what was actually done to him in the Hanoi Hilton.
I was under the impression you could appeal to your Chief of police or the CHSB with a Lawyer? No?
Or, looking at the other side - when an American POW is waterboarded or chained naked until he s--ts himself is that a "professional interrogation technique" or "torture"? It's nasty business, but any side that uses the technique to extract information loses any legitimacy when complaining about the other side using it for a similar purpose.
Oh really? And the basis for this speculation, calling this veteran a lying, is what?I have to say that the kid obviously has much more of a record than the media is revealing. The DA was probably privy to a detailed school record, which indicates much more than we know, now...
The sad fact is that romney is the best opportunity america's gun owners have at this time.![]()
MassBackwards posted part of his blog a while back that listed all the anti-gun actions Mitt did while he was in office. It was pretty telling.We are in TROUBLE..... wasn't the Handgun Consumer Protection Act past under is watch?
We are in TROUBLE..... wasn't the Handgun Consumer Protection Act past [sic] under is [sic] watch?
I can't believe all the sticklers on this forum want to pardon a person with a felony firearms charge to allow him to obtain a ccw. I must be in bizzaro world.Why does it matter that he's a vet.I say thanks for your service and to all on this forum, but I know quite a few vets that I wouldn't like walking around with a ccw.
So what, he turned it on someone pulled the trigger, hurt someone, got in trouble the pleaded guilty.I'm sorry I have no sympathy for him.
So what, he turned it on someone pulled the trigger, hurt someone, got in trouble the pleaded guilty.I'm sorry I have no sympathy for him.