I have both. I use my AK for things like cheap plinking at some rich dude's Porsche.
So that's where the holes in my Porsche came from! Oh well I can dream about owning a Porsche anyway....
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
I have both. I use my AK for things like cheap plinking at some rich dude's Porsche.
thats like my Mosin the rear sight goes up to 2000 meters. Unless im shooting at Godzilla how am i suppose to see something at 2000 meters with iron sights let alone hit it.
Is good Russian design. If cannot hit target at 2000 meters is fault of shooter, not of rifle. Silly Western girly-man.
Thats what she said.
Hahaha!Is good Russian design. If cannot hit target at 2000 meters is fault of shooter, not of rifle. Silly Western girly-man.
for me right now it would be my Mosin Nagant since thats the only rifle i have, but idealy. No Doubt AK-47, to me a WSHTF rifle needs to be extremely reliable and the AK-47 is the king of reliablility. With everything going on i dont want to worry about maintence.
if you can see a human size target and hit it at 2000 meters with the iron sights then you sir are amazing.
I have heard there were some buffer spring issues with the M-4.
Otherwise the mosign, one for each of the family, a few Mossberg 500's and numerous .22's LOL
No disrespect, but that means nothing.I have heard there were some buffer spring issues with the M-4.
Those rifles were also used for firing volleys, that's where the 2km comes from.....
From my HTC EVO via Tapatalk
No disrespect, but that means nothing.
ARs, like 1911s, are parts guns. Anyone can make one out of good parts or shit parts. And there are dozens of parts vendors for just about everything that goes into either of them.
Buy a duty-grade AR15, or put one together with duty-grade parts, and the problems magically disappear.
Hobby-grade rifles need not apply.
ARs, like 1911s, are parts guns. Anyone can make one out of good parts or shit parts. And there are dozens of parts vendors for just about everything that goes into either of them.
While I agree with the good vs shit parts thing, if you have a poorly fitted 1911 it'll probably be a piece of shit, whereas you don't have to really "fit" anything on an AR-15. There's a lot more nuance/BS in getting a 1911 that works right than an AR that does.
I could probably put an AR together that worked on the first try with the right tools. I doubt I would be able to assemble
a 1911 unless all the parts that required fitting were pre-fitted somehow.
-Mike
You just like to nitpick, don't you?
Your argument, whilst entirely valid, has nothing to do with the conversation.
While I agree with the good vs shit parts thing, if you have a poorly fitted 1911 it'll probably be a piece of shit, whereas you don't have to really "fit" anything on an AR-15. There's a lot more nuance/BS in getting a 1911 that works right than an AR that does.
I could probably put an AR together that worked on the first try with the right tools. I doubt I would be able to assemble
a 1911 unless all the parts that required fitting were pre-fitted somehow.
-Mike
I was just curious, because I haven't seen it mentioned and I didn't want to start another thread. What about a scout rifle, or at least something that resembles one (it doesn't have to match Cooper's exact definition)?
M1A for me i guess but IMHO the whole bugout thing is complete fantasy. esp in NE!
right, use a bolt action, able to fire 1 shot for every 6 that EACH of your autorifle using enemies can fire at you.