I hope this is not going to be viewed as thread ressurection, but I had a conversation with a guy at work yesterday and he brought up a good point in regards to brandishing.
The point was this: If brandishing is against the law, does your gun legally have to be invisible? Duh, of course not. So then what is the legal time limit between drawing and firing? The only way to establish that a gun has been "brandished" would be to have a set maximum allowable time between drawing and firing, right?
A trained SWAT officer could draw and kill me and all I would probably see would be a blur and a flash before everything went dark, but how about my 65 year old mother. To make it fair, I suggest at least 8-10 seconds be the law between drawing and firing. If the scumbag turns and starts to run away while I am taking aim or fumbling with my holster, I will just chase him down and back shoot him so that I can not be found guilty of brandishing.
This is really a dumb argument that has probably come about through the actions of dumb LEOs and Dumb DAs. Maybe even a few dumb jurors.
OK
1) There IS no law against 'brandishing' in MA. Showing your gun in the course of an altercation is usually deemed ADW - Assault with a Deadly Weapon.
2) No, your gun doesn't have to be 'invisible' per statute - but walk around in MA OCing and see what happens. You get popped for DP and lose your LTC at minimum. It's happened. There's a northshore case where the wind blew open the guys cover garment exposing his CCW - cop saw it and busted him.
3) You're in MA. If you draw your gun, you're going to be arrested. Period. What you need to hope for is that the situation will allow you to make a very valid self-defense argument.