It seems the appeals court overturned the injunction not on the merits of the case, but on procedural grounds: Specifically "standing".
The case was brought by "a group of journalists, scholars and activists". These journalists, scholars, and activists are not being harmed by these indefinite detentions, so have no standing to challenge them.
Disclaimer: I haven't read any more than the article referenced.
Just remember Napolitano said the all Veterans were potential terrorists, how long until they drop the potential part of that and then we can be put away
"Standing" is complete bullshit when you're fighting the constitutionality of the law. The very idea one must "commit a crime" in order to challenge a law threatening ones freedom is ludicrous on its face.
"You can't challenge being purged through concentration camps unless you first let yourself be purged."
"Standing" is complete bullshit when you're fighting the constitutionality of the law. The very idea one must "commit a crime" in order to challenge a law threatening ones freedom is ludicrous on its face.
"You can't challenge being purged through concentration camps unless you first let yourself be purged."